LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 04-26-2012, 07:45 PM   #21
Misebeita

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
This is an old map based on outdated Dienekes run. BTW the sample use there consisted of Vologda Russians that have elevated Asian admix compared to Russians.
Where is the better map?

Additionally I have to point out that West Asian and Siberian are not equal in terms of admix. One is Caucasoid element close to Euro ones while the latter is quite foreign. Circular argumentation and unbased assumptions. How do you define what is foreign in Europe? So West Asian admix is more European than Siberian admix because most of today's Europeans have a good share of the former instead of the latter. That means that if most Europeans have excessive SS African admix in the future, and if as a consequence West Asian admix becomes marginal, then SSA admix has to be considered European whereas West Asian is more foreign.
Misebeita is offline


Old 04-26-2012, 07:49 PM   #22
opelayday

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
537
Senior Member
Default
Where is the better map?

Circular argumentation and unbased assumptions. How do you define what is foreign in Europe? So West Asian admix is more European than Siberian admix because most of today's Europeans have a good share of the former instead of the latter. That means that if most Europeans have excessive SS African admix, and if as a consequence West Asian admix becomes marginal, then SSA admix has to be considered European whereas West Asian is more foreign.
West Asian is just genetically much closer to European than both African and Siberian components so there's nothing arbitrarry about the things I say.

Here you go with a Polacko's genetic map

opelayday is offline


Old 04-26-2012, 07:53 PM   #23
Eltabaco

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
Kursk, Tver, Smolensk,Bryansk,Tula,Saratov,Voronezh counties just to name a few.
Some of those places remind me of old Finnish settlements.
Eltabaco is offline


Old 04-26-2012, 07:57 PM   #24
Promotiona

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
324
Senior Member
Default
West Asian is just genetically much closer to European than both African and Siberian components so there's nothing arbitrarry about the things I say.

Here you go with a Polacko's genetic map

No, Padre Organtino, West Asians are closer to most Europeans than the Siberians because most Europeans have these West Asian non-European components. If Finnics are the ultimate and real Europeans, then Siberian is more European than West Asian. Why would you consider "Indo-Europeans" to be more European than Finnics? Think about it for a while and you'll notice the circle.
Promotiona is offline


Old 04-26-2012, 08:00 PM   #25
quack!

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
607
Senior Member
Default
No, Padre Organtino, West Asians are closer to most Europeans than the Siberians because most Europeans have these West Asian non-European components. If Finnics are the ultimate and real Europeans, then Siberian is more European than West Asian. Why would you consider "Indo-Europeans" to be more European than Finnics? Think about it for a while and you'll notice the circle.
Nope, Georgians are also closer to Basques who have effectively zero Anantolian/West Asian component than any really Siberian population. You seem to have a trouble understanding that Caucasoid population have diverged from each other much later than from non-Caucasoid ones. Of course Northern Euros have a bit higher affinity with East Asians than otehr Caucasoids even without Siberian admix (common Paleolithic ancestry) but that's about it.
quack! is offline


Old 04-26-2012, 08:00 PM   #26
Jeaxatoem

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
546
Senior Member
Default
These "who is whiter" threads keep Finns busy. They are diligent in participating there.
Jeaxatoem is offline


Old 04-26-2012, 08:02 PM   #27
doksSirmAdods

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
638
Senior Member
Default
These "who is whiter" threads keep Finns busy. They are diligent in participating there.
I think the ultimate thread should be Spaniards vs Finns with Abenjaldun and Motorhead as heavy artillery from both sides.
doksSirmAdods is offline


Old 04-26-2012, 08:02 PM   #28
Grennios

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
522
Senior Member
Default
These "who is whiter" threads keep Finns busy. They are diligent in participating there.
Yes, this is topic of uttermost importance for all Finns. Especially if we are whiter than some thirdworld turko-slavs. That would make us allmost genetically Europeans you know.
Grennios is offline


Old 04-26-2012, 08:03 PM   #29
Pete789

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
These "who is whiter" threads keep Finns busy. They are diligent in participating there.
I was just waiting when you come and say your enlightened opinion about who are real ethnic Russians.
Pete789 is offline


Old 04-26-2012, 08:07 PM   #30
mosypeSom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
432
Senior Member
Default
Nope, Georgians are also closer to Basques who have effectively zero Anantolian/West Asian component than any really Siberian population. You seem to have a trouble understanding that Caucasoid population have diverged from each other much later than from non-Caucasoid ones. Of course Northern Euros have a bit higher affinity with East Asians than otehr Caucasoids even without Siberian admix (common Paleolithic ancestry) but that's about it.
Georgian caucasoids are non-European. The whole question about genetic Europeanness (West Asian vs. Siberian) is just as relevant as the question who are more American, those who have predominantly English or German ancestry.
mosypeSom is offline


Old 04-26-2012, 08:13 PM   #31
conurgenceDen

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
405
Senior Member
Default
Georgian caucasoids are non-European. The whole question about genetic Europeanness (West Asian vs. Siberian) is just as relevant as the question who are more American, those who have predominantly English or German ancestry.
They're still closer to any European group than say Mongols. So once again - Russians having more Med and Anatolian than Finns does not prevent them from being more Euro genetically as they have less East Asian.
conurgenceDen is offline


Old 04-26-2012, 08:26 PM   #32
cucceevevaind

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
652
Senior Member
Default
Russians having more Med and Anatolian than Finns does not prevent them from being more Euro genetically as they have less East Asian.
Russians are more East Asian than Finns are.
cucceevevaind is offline


Old 04-26-2012, 08:30 PM   #33
vekiuytyh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
449
Senior Member
Default
Russians are more East Asian than Finns are.
Not really. I thought Finns being more admixed with East Asians than Russians was a commond knowledge to everyone including Finns themselves.
vekiuytyh is offline


Old 04-27-2012, 02:21 AM   #34
zenihan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
Not really. I thought Finns being more admixed with East Asians than Russians was a commond knowledge to everyone including Finns themselves.
Well "common knowledge" about Finns seldom match with scientific facts like we see here.
zenihan is offline


Old 04-27-2012, 02:39 AM   #35
ValintinoV

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
335
Senior Member
Default
Finns are not as white as eggs. Damned eggs, 1000% Europeans.

---------- Post added 2012-04-26 at 18:40 ----------

Not really. I thought Finns being more admixed with East Asians than Russians was a commond knowledge to everyone including Finns themselves.
Finns admixed with Koreans and Japanese, you say? I'm impressed we managed to screw all across Siberia.
ValintinoV is offline


Old 04-27-2012, 02:48 AM   #36
Unwiseevove

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
They're still closer to any European group than say Mongols. So once again - Russians having more Med and Anatolian than Finns does not prevent them from being more Euro genetically as they have less East Asian.
Georgians are closer to Europeans than Mongols are, okay. That's true. And that proves WHAT? The fact is that West Asians = non-European, Siberians = non-European. The Russians have more East Asian than the Finns.
Unwiseevove is offline


Old 04-27-2012, 03:02 AM   #37
gagagaridze

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
518
Senior Member
Default
Padre Organic is caucasian. They live in mountains and have long distances to schools. Forgive him.
gagagaridze is offline


Old 04-27-2012, 03:07 AM   #38
shanice

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
374
Senior Member
Default
Not really. I thought Finns being more admixed with East Asians than Russians was a commond knowledge to everyone including Finns themselves.
There is hardly any East Asian admix amongst the Finns but it's fairly typical amongst the Russians.
shanice is offline


Old 04-27-2012, 03:09 AM   #39
Gulauur

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
595
Senior Member
Default
Josef Stalin was whiter.
Gulauur is offline


Old 04-27-2012, 03:09 AM   #40
drycleden

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
Well "common knowledge" about Finns seldom match with scientific facts like we see here.
It actually does match those facts in this case though certainly one must take those "popular opinions" with a grain of salt

Finns admixed with Koreans and Japanese, you say? I'm impressed we managed to screw all across Siberia.
Let's try to imitate serious talk. I obviously meant North Asian/Siberian admix and not Far East Asians. Pardon me for creating this confusion.


Georgians are closer to Europeans than Mongols are, okay. That's true. And that proves WHAT? The fact is that West Asians = non-European, Siberians = non-European. The Russians have more East Asian than the Finns.
Well, as I've mentioned you have more East Asian/Siberian than Russians and that's a genetic fact. Secondly to explain why there is a difference between it and say West Asian I can give you the following example: two halfblood guys. One is from Nigerian mother and Finnic father. Another is from Romanian mother and Finnic father (let's not go into details of how that's possible). Both guys have non-Finnic ancestries (i.e. their mothers are not Finnic genetically). Yet one of them will be miles closer to Finns genotypically and phenotypically. The same logic works for those principal components, inferred by ADMIXTURE.
drycleden is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:11 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity