LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-02-2012, 07:39 PM   #1
chuviskkk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default If you had to choose one out of these three
If you had to choose one out of these three, who would you choose?

Germans are villagers, coarse, but they are hardworking guys. They wouldn't put a Slav in their place (Poland invasion etc) but then they invaded France they tried to speak French they liked the food culture and so on. They feel superior to the slavs but their inferiority complex to the French is obvious. The Germans caught the industrial revolution late, and as they didn't have colonies they had to form an alliance with the Ottomans. I like Germans, but I wish the holocaust didn't happen. Its reason for huge shame. There can be battles, you can change the areas demography, you can hang the opponents, these can be reasoned, but digging the roots of 6 millions people cannot be forgotten.
Regardless of how much the German industry and charitable establishments donate money to Israel, even though they give military help to the Israeli army (helping to make killing the Palestinians easier) it still doesn't wipe out their shame.

The French are superior in their literature and culture. What Napoleon and his organisation did for Europe is obvious. Although Napoleon may have killed more people than necessary, yet Alexander the great was a mass murderer. These are understandable things. The French due to their tendency to show off, they brought innovation and change to the places they went to. Roads, schools etc they did good for the places they invaded. The problems of France today are because there aren't any French. Gypsies, Armenians, Polish, African Jews being made culturally more important doesn't suit this country. This is their losing point.

Now, the English. The leaders of the industrial revolution, the real birthplace of democracy, the biggest empire seen in history as well as the biggest enemies of Islam.
Neither the Pope nor the Crusades have harmed the middle East and Asia like they have. The places they invaded (if there were non whites) they made a habit to steal from rather than invest in, they are an interesting people the English.

Among the 3, my choice goes with a small difference to the Germans. What do you think? who is more superior?
chuviskkk is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 07:43 PM   #2
prpaims

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
520
Senior Member
Default
Names will be noted of those who don't vote for England.
prpaims is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 07:59 PM   #3
Escamsrasiush

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
Those three peoples are bunches of morons...

But they are the best at rewriting the History.
Escamsrasiush is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 08:07 PM   #4
18holesin

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
580
Senior Member
Default
I voted for England because I feel some sympathy for Englishmen like Benny Hill, Hugh Grant, Mr Bean, and Borat. As a second option I would have voted for France because they have the prettiest women and the most beautiful language.
18holesin is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 08:09 PM   #5
masterso

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
546
Senior Member
Default
I voted for England because I feel some sympathy for Englishmen like Benny Hill, Hugh Grant, Mr Bean, and Borat. As a second option I would have voted for France because they have the prettiest women and the most beautiful language.
So, the best are Argentinians because of Tinelli...
masterso is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 08:12 PM   #6
Blelidupgerie

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
419
Senior Member
Default
So, the best are Argentinians because of Tinelli...
Especially because of YAYO's jokes. Have you heard them? It's not the finest type of humor, but it's quite good.
Blelidupgerie is offline


Old 06-02-2012, 08:17 PM   #7
DghtRdc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default
None of them is superior , to the others . they are just different and in same time similar in all the way .

By the way I'm french . I choose the french .
DghtRdc is offline


Old 06-03-2012, 09:14 PM   #8
vRmy0Fzg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
vRmy0Fzg is offline


Old 06-03-2012, 09:21 PM   #9
krek-sikUp

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
Soccerfan19: racist anti-slavic manipulating self-hater idiotic wankie-moron. He gets my vote.
krek-sikUp is offline


Old 06-03-2012, 09:34 PM   #10
unlomarma

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
360
Senior Member
Default
If you had to choose one out of these three, who would you choose?

Germans are villagers, coarse, but they are hardworking guys. They wouldn't put a Slav in their place (Poland invasion etc) but then they invaded France they tried to speak French they liked the food culture and so on. They feel superior to the slavs but their inferiority complex to the French is obvious. The Germans caught the industrial revolution late, and as they didn't have colonies they had to form an alliance with the Ottomans. I like Germans, but I wish the holocaust didn't happen. Its reason for huge shame. There can be battles, you can change the areas demography, you can hang the opponents, these can be reasoned, but digging the roots of 6 millions people cannot be forgotten.
Regardless of how much the German industry and charitable establishments donate money to Israel, even though they give military help to the Israeli army (helping to make killing the Palestinians easier) it still doesn't wipe out their shame.

The French are superior in their literature and culture. What Napoleon and his organisation did for Europe is obvious. Although Napoleon may have killed more people than necessary, yet Alexander the great was a mass murderer. These are understandable things. The French due to their tendency to show off, they brought innovation and change to the places they went to. Roads, schools etc they did good for the places they invaded. The problems of France today are because there aren't any French. Gypsies, Armenians, Polish, African Jews being made culturally more important doesn't suit this country. This is their losing point.

Now, the English. The leaders of the industrial revolution, the real birthplace of democracy, the biggest empire seen in history as well as the biggest enemies of Islam.
Neither the Pope nor the Crusades have harmed the middle East and Asia like they have. The places they invaded (if there were non whites) they made a habit to steal from rather than invest in, they are an interesting people the English.

Among the 3, my choice goes with a small difference to the Germans. What do you think? who is more superior?
what a pile of bullshit, lol

edited:
what a huge pile of bullshit, lol
unlomarma is offline


Old 06-03-2012, 09:53 PM   #11
Oppofeescom

Join Date
Dec 2005
Posts
444
Senior Member
Default
Based on our negative history with Germany and the recent hatred Germans and Englishmen have shown me on online forums, I'll go with France.
Oppofeescom is offline


Old 06-03-2012, 10:52 PM   #12
katespepach

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
Based on our negative history with Germany and the recent hatred Germans and Englishmen have shown me on online forums, I'll go with France.
Germans and English towards a Norwegian? English I noticed to be rather fond of Scandivanians and 'Vikings connection' and Germans, well, I dont visit other forums but on this one i did not notice them bashing any particular group, and rather positivie attitude to NW Europe countries.
katespepach is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:03 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity