[nakeseireo]

English doned me wrong apparently.

English may not have, but applying new information to existing formats has. But you are young....you still have time to learn.

[Ztcgtqvb]

English may not have, but applying new information to existing formats has.

So reviewing all turnovers without challenges isn't new(outside of booth reviews and final two minute shit)? I probably don't watch enough pigskin.

[nakeseireo]

So reviewing all turnovers without challenges isn't new(outside of booth reviews and final two minute shit)? I probably don't watch enough pigskin.

You are awesome.

[JessePex]

Maybe, now they won't be so slap happy to blow the whistle when the ball is loose.

[Ztcgtqvb]

You are awesome.

Naturally, but where was I wrong in my interpretation of the OP? I honestly didn't know they did this previously.

[yxn2dC07]

All turnovers will be subject to review. I believe that all turnovers will technically be reviewed by the booth. Some turnovers will take longer to review than others.

At least, this appears to be how scoring plays are reviewed.

[nakeseireo]

All turnovers will be subject to review. I believe that all turnovers will technically be reviewed by the booth. Some turnovers will take longer to review than others.

At least, this appears to be how scoring plays are reviewed.

Most questionable turnovers are reviewed anyway, so it shouldn't slow things down much at all. Should eliminate a good portion of coaches challenges one would think.

[nakeseireo]

Naturally, but where was I wrong in my interpretation of the OP? I honestly didn't know they did this previously.

Hence the new information part.

I often wonder if you are playing a character or this is actually your real personality. If it is a character, I must say I'm impressed with your commitment to a bit.

[yxn2dC07]

Most questionable turnovers are reviewed anyway, so it shouldn't slow things down much at all. Should eliminate a good portion of coaches challenges one would think.

It will be interesting to see how officials handle it. Some would argue that officials will be more likely to rule something a turnover or a score since it will be automatically reviewed. On the other hand, that thinking ignores the standard of proof that must be there in order to overturn a call on the field.

Which makes me wonder -- in cases where officials cannot determine what happened (and it will likely go to review anyway) -- why not just let the booth reviewer determine it rather than even making a call. Is this where we're headed?

[vNZsk39B]

Hence the new information part.

I often wonder if you are playing a character or this is actually your real personality. If it is a character, I must say I'm impressed with your commitment to a bit.

I think this is simply another instance of STW applying black and white/all or nothing standards to internetz conversation again. We have to accept going forward that he's going to do this all the time from now on, I think.

[Ztcgtqvb]

I think this is simply another instance of STW applying black and white/all or nothing standards to internetz conversation again. We have to accept going forward that he's going to do this all the time from now on, I think.

"All turnovers to be reviewed"

Honestly. It has a finite word in it. "All".

I don't see how there is gray in the sentence at all.

[vNZsk39B]

"All turnovers to be reviewed"

Honestly. It has a finite word in it. "All".

I don't see how there is gray in the sentence at all.

I'd like to think you're not so savagely stupid that you can't read between the lines sometimes. But lately, you're proving me wrong.

[nakeseireo]

It will be interesting to see how officials handle it. Some would argue that officials will be more likely to rule something a turnover or a score since it will be automatically reviewed. On the other hand, that thinking ignores the standard of proof that must be there in order to overturn a call on the field.

Which makes me wonder -- in cases where officials cannot determine what happened (and it will likely go to review anyway) -- why not just let the booth reviewer determine it rather than even making a call. Is this where we're headed?

People made that argument with the whole fumble/no-fumble thing, but that hasn't proven to be the case. My guess is the refs are still going to make the call as they see it.

[nakeseireo]

I think this is simply another instance of STW applying black and white/all or nothing standards to internetz conversation again. We have to accept going forward that he's going to do this all the time from now on, I think.

I wouldn't call it a new phenomenon.

[Ztcgtqvb]

I'd like to think you're not so savagely stupid that you can't read between the lines sometimes. But lately, you're proving me wrong.

So..."all"...doesn't mean..."all". It actually means, "some" or "most", right? I'm supposed to assume that finite words are not what they seem? There wasn't even a modifier to the turnovers for fucks sake like "controversial" or "debateable".

[Nundduedola]

You're missing the more important point. They go to commercials during the reviews. It will result in more revenue. And the salary cap will go up.

The NFL doesn't sell ad space, and the TV contracts are already set.

[yxn2dC07]

Interesting question in the comments on ESPN is whether this also applies to turnovers on downs.

[vNZsk39B]

So..."all"...doesn't mean..."all". It actually means, "some" or "most", right? I'm supposed to assume that finite words are not what they seem? There wasn't even a modifier to the turnovers for fucks sake like "controversial" or "debateable".

Nope, I'm convinced. You're an idiot.

[nakeseireo]

Interesting question in the comments on ESPN is whether this also applies to turnovers on downs.

Was that STW's comment?

[Ztcgtqvb]

Nope, I'm convinced. You're an idiot.

I pose hard questions, I know.

I should get into journalism as my second job, not reporting.