Reply to Thread New Thread |
04-28-2011, 01:27 AM | #21 |
|
Mike Tolbert scored well. He had significantly less yards (both rushing & receiving), and a worse rushing average. It's not even really comparable. For being their only option, it's amazing Hillis put up the season that he did. You'd figure with the pathetic receiving corp and shitty options at RB that the opposing defense would be able to single in on Hillis and shut him down. |
|
04-28-2011, 01:29 AM | #22 |
|
You're forgetting the only thing that matters. He was a hero in fantasy football cause he was drafted like 9th round or later. |
|
04-28-2011, 01:34 AM | #23 |
|
Mike Tolbert scored well. He had significantly less yards (both rushing & receiving), and a worse rushing average. It's not even really comparable. For being their only option, it's amazing Hillis put up the season that he did. You'd figure with the pathetic receiving corp and shitty options at RB that the opposing defense would be able to single in on Hillis and shut him down. Personally, I would have put somebody more exciting on the cover if it were to be a RB -- Arian Foster (led in YFS, rushing yards, rushing TDs, total TDs) or Jamaal Charles (pretty amazing 6.4 YPC), or even McFadden (5.2 YPC and 10 total TDs despite getting injured for a portion of the season). Or of course you could have put a QB on there -- Rodgers, Vick, Brady. All in all, it doesn't really matter. I just think Hillis is getting a raw deal in this thread so far. You agree there were many better options. I think that's the point. |
|
04-28-2011, 01:40 AM | #24 |
|
Tolbert had many fewer chances though. He only had about 2/3 the number of rushes. So add in 1/3 more rushes and he'd have many more td's. Interestingly, despite the limited carries (and being thought of as a goal-line back which hurts yd per rush avg), Tolbert still had more 20+ yard rushes than Hillis. |
|
04-28-2011, 02:22 AM | #26 |
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 02:58 AM | #27 |
|
Let's see... |
|
04-28-2011, 03:02 AM | #28 |
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 04:09 AM | #29 |
|
None of that happened in 2009. He had his best season ever. Madden covers are like automobiles...1 year ahead. That's why Brett was wearing a Packer jersey. They were honoring his career, since he had retired. MADDEN 09 Some up and coming young gunslinger named Brett Favre is on the newest cover. He’s bound to lead the Packers…or Buccaneers or Vikings or Bears or Packers to a great season this year. http://www.holytaco.com/20-years-of-madden-covers/ |
|
04-28-2011, 07:31 PM | #31 |
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 07:35 PM | #32 |
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 08:04 PM | #34 |
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 08:06 PM | #35 |
|
|
|
04-28-2011, 09:59 PM | #36 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|