[FYIbiatches]

because i certainly meant if there wasn't a season. your stupidity knows no bounds. i've encountered a lot of dumb people in my life. you're easily the dumbest. i wouldn't be shocked to learn that you spend you 30 minutes each morning deciding which leg to first put into a pair of pants every morning.

Clown, you asked a completely asinine question.

The answer could very well have been figured out *if* you only had a brain.

[Crundaangerge]

Adam Schefter's supposed to report without a bias, Clown.

The Owners are calling it what they want to....Clown.

how would reporting that be biased?

[xsexymasterix]

how would reporting that be biased?

Owners are calling it a 'walkout' when they are the ones locking the players out.
He's reporting what is happening and not buying into the 'spin' that one side is trying to put on it....Clown.

[pinawinekolad]

Clown, you asked a completely asinine question.

The answer could very well have been figured out *if* you only had a brain.

so you're saying there cannot be a season next year? you should consider a name change to the dope.

[Green_Monkey23]

so you're saying there cannot be a season next year? you should consider a name change to the dope.

That's not what i said, Scarecrow.

[12Cickprior]

Owners are calling it a 'walkout' when they are the ones locking the players out.
He's reporting what is happening and not buying into the 'spin' that one side is trying to put on it....Clown.

that doesn't explain how it would be biased. do know what bias means?

[PersonalLoansBank]

that doesn't explain how it would be biased. do know what bias means?

Just like on the other site, you have no clue when it comes to PR and 'politics'.

[Imalaycle]

That's not what i said, Scarecrow.

so there can be a season, yet the question of whether there will be a salary cap is assinine.

keep being you.

[layedgebiamma]

Just like on the other site, you have no clue when it comes to PR and 'politics'.

him reporting what the owners have said would be biased. god you are dumb.

[GoodLover]

him reporting what the owners have said would be biased. god you are dumb.

Not what i said either, Scarecrow.

And don't call God dumb, Clown.

[Bletlemof]

so there can be a season, yet the question of whether there will be a salary cap is assinine.

keep being you.

If things were to work out and we had a season, there would be some sort of cap. Right now there's no season, so no cap.

See how that works???
(Oh i'm sorry, you don't).

[UnmariKam]

Not what i said either, Scarecrow.

And don't call God dumb, Clown.

it's exactly what you've said. christ you can't even comprehend your own thoughts.

[Eromereorybig]

it's exactly what you've said. christ you can't even comprehend your own thoughts.

Nope, what you dream up is not what i said.

Schefter's using the nomenclature that we're all familiar with as opposed to using the term the owners would like him to.

[TriammaMade]

Nope, what you dream up is not what i said.

Schefter's using the nomenclature that we're all familiar with as opposed to using the term the owners would like him to.

you said he didn't report what the owners are calling it because that would be biased. you're retarded. literally.

[Qdkczrdi]

If things were to work out and we had a season, there would be some sort of cap. Right now there's no season, so no cap.

See how that works???
(Oh i'm sorry, you don't).

seeing as there was no cap in 2010 and it's believed that the 2010 rules are what the owners would use in a season next year and that you know nothing about anything, i'll wait for a more informed response.

[acissombiapse]

you said he didn't report what the owners are calling it because that would be biased. you're retarded. literally.

He's not using their term, Clown.

[CedssypeEdids]

seeing as there was no cap in 2010 and it's believed that the 2010 rules are what the owners would use in a season next year and that you know nothing about anything, i'll wait for a more informed response.

If the players get more money & benefits, there will have to be something they also give up and that something will more than likely be a cap.....Clown.

[ephennaCypota]

He's not using their term, Clown.

and you said it would be biased if he would have.

[N9u9ie4p]

and you said it would be biased if he would have.

If he would have used the term in his reporting not if he reported *on* the term, Clown.

[dselectronics]

OK. Its done. The union has decertified. Players have brought legal action (Brees, Manning, etc.).
Godall said - "The proposal we made included an offer to narrow the player compensation gap that existed in the negotiations by splitting the difference; guarantee a reallocation of savings from first-round rookies to veterans and retirees without negatively affecting compensation for rounds 2-7; no compensation reduction for veterans; implement new year-round health and safety rules; retain the current 16-4 season format for at least two years with any subsequent changes subject to the approval of the league and union; and establish a new legacy fund for retired players ($82 million contributed by the owners over the next two years)."
The NFLPA side:
The following is what the NFLPA listed as the issues it felt prevented a new collective bargaining agreement from being reached:
• The NFL demanded a multibillion dollar giveback and refused to provide any legitimate financial information to justify it.
• The NFL’s offer on March 7 to give the NFLPA a single sheet of numbers was not financial disclosure. The players’ accountants and bankers advised that the “offered” information was meaningless: only two numbers for each year.
• The NFL wanted to turn the clock back on player compensation by four years, moving them back to where they were in 2007.
• The NFL offered no proposal at all for long-term share of revenues.
• NFL demanded 100 percent of all revenues which went above unrealistically low projections for the first four years.
• The NFL refused to meet the players on significant changes to in-season, offseason or preseason health and safety rules.
• The NFL kept on the table its hypocritical demand for an 18-game season, despite its public claims to be working toward improving the heath and safety of players.
• The NFL wanted cutbacks in payer workers’ compensation benefits for injured players.
• The NFL sought to limit rookie compensation long after they become veterans — into players’ fourth and fifth years ...
•The players offered repeatedly to continue working under the existing CBA, but were rejected by the NFL five times.
•Despite publicly admitting no club was losing money, that TV ratings, sponsorship money, etc. were at an all time high, the NFL continued to insist on an 18-percent rollback in the players’ share of revenues and continue to deny the NFLPA’s request for justification.