Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
about ALL things NFL labor talks and the $$$$ involved.
http://blogs.forbes.com/sportsmoney/...t-unwarranted/ http://blogs.forbes.com/sportsmoney/...m-cut-and-dry/ |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Crybaby Packers. Maybe they should get out of the billionaires' business. I have to hope that the players are successful in their lawsuit against the league involving their "lockout insurance" tv contracts. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
True. But do you want teams with smaller revenue bases (like the Vikes) to lose key players to bidding wars? ![]() I don't think removing franchise tag will change the competitive balance as long as there is a salary cap and revenue sharing. When the vikes get new stadium, they'll no longer be at the bottom in revenue. If that new stadium is in LA or elsewhere, I'll no longer care what happens. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
players hate it I think Franchise is average of the top 5 and Transitional tag is average of the top 10 salary. I don't know if the NFLPA still likes all the aspects of the franchise and transition tags, we'll see. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|