Reply to Thread New Thread |
10-15-2007, 05:42 PM | #1 |
|
Here is a list of things myself and the talking heads here at Sports-Boards.net have come up with that will help the best run league in sports, run even better, more efficiently and provide more entertainment value.
#1 Full-time refs, not only could we have younger guys with better eyesight, but in the offseason when the regulars are off doing there 9-5, the full-refs could be attending offseason training 3-5 days a week, putting them light years ahead of the schlubs we have right now. |
|
10-15-2007, 05:45 PM | #2 |
|
#2
All replay should be reviewed by an official in the booth. There is no point to the added delay of having the ref come off the field, look through the various camera shots, and then come back on the field. The replay ref would only be responsible for replay review. It would be a nice way to reward refs who can no longer keep up on the field by giving them a cushy desk job while still utilizing their experience. |
|
10-15-2007, 05:50 PM | #4 |
|
|
|
10-15-2007, 05:53 PM | #5 |
|
|
|
10-15-2007, 06:00 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
10-15-2007, 06:06 PM | #7 |
|
|
|
10-15-2007, 06:09 PM | #8 |
|
Anti-Rep. |
|
10-15-2007, 06:11 PM | #9 |
|
Anti-Rep. The Union negotiates retirement benefits, but only to a point - as it benefits CURRENT players. Old-time-players had nothing, and the union had no reason to negotiate on their behalf - as they weren't paying any dues. Mid 70's is when the Union finally had some bargaining position. |
|
10-15-2007, 06:51 PM | #10 |
|
#3 League minimum is what 350-450K a year? And, it's been about that for quite a while now. As far as I'm concerned anyone who retired from the NFL from about maybe 1989 to now, IMO should have no reason to be eating out of a garbage can. Those folks should have been smart enough to stash some of that money they got in a savings account or some bonds or mutual funds or in their mattresses at the very least. A dirty accountant might be a good exception to the rule, but not that good as you should be able to have some control over your finances and be checking up on them. If I ever hear about a guy like Jerry Rice (purely for demonstration purposes) come to some sort of hearing like we have today in congress about how he can't afford health care and this and that, I'd laugh him out of the room. Of course, I still question some of these older players (especially ones who didn't have their career shortened by a fluke injury or the like) not being able to stick some of the money they made away and let it work for them. If there's one thing the league and NFLPA could do better is set up some sort of class or service designed to help the players make educated decisions about dealing with their money. Things like how to deal with a check that's more than a couple hundred a week. What sort of options are out there for investment. With that kind of money, it's easy to lose track of where it's all going with purchases, investments, and donations. |
|
10-15-2007, 07:18 PM | #11 |
|
I'll agree with the last half of the last sentence for the older guys who didn't have the opportunity to earn an outrageous salery like many of these guys are now. Players from a couple of decades ago did not earn the bling that players make today. I feel no sympathy for a guy who pisses away is fortune living the high life instead of preparing for life after football. I'm more concerned with the NFL taking care (medically) of the players from yester year. They helped make the league what it is today. |
|
10-15-2007, 07:21 PM | #12 |
|
|
|
10-15-2007, 07:28 PM | #13 |
|
I would as well. |
|
10-15-2007, 07:30 PM | #14 |
|
I can't fully disagree with that as healthcare wasn't a big concern back then. However, the salaries they made back then were still quite a bit better than the average Joe out there. Players were still making around double what a normal person was making back then. It still comes down to fiscal responsibility, IMO. |
|
10-15-2007, 07:38 PM | #15 |
|
I would as well. |
|
10-15-2007, 07:40 PM | #16 |
|
Even if they were making double what a working person was making, they only got that income for a handful of years. I believe the average NFL career is around 3 years. It's hard to get a meaningful retirement funded in that short of a time. What then would qualify a former player for pension benefits and extended healthcare benefits? |
|
10-15-2007, 07:47 PM | #18 |
|
|
|
10-15-2007, 07:47 PM | #19 |
|
Yeah, I suppose. I see where you're coming from. I guess it's a lot shorter than I thought. I guess when you factor in all the Johnny-come-latelies who make the roster for a year or two and then can't latch on anywhere else it puts things in perspective. |
|
10-15-2007, 07:47 PM | #20 |
|
Yeah, I suppose. I see where you're coming from. I guess it's a lot shorter than I thought. I guess when you factor in all the Johnny-come-latelies who make the roster for a year or two and then can't latch on anywhere else it puts things in perspective. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 15 (0 members and 15 guests) | |
|