LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 10-20-2005, 08:00 AM   #1
www.forumsovetov.ru

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
546
Senior Member
Default
Right on, boik. Stats don't tell it all. Darrin Erstad is a great example of that.
www.forumsovetov.ru is offline


Old 10-31-2005, 08:00 AM   #2
largonioulurI

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
hey he did win ST player of the week for punting for the ravins
Maybe he finally found something hes good at...
largonioulurI is offline


Old 11-02-2005, 08:00 AM   #3
Colorostikse

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
380
Senior Member
Default
Right on, boik. Stats don't tell it all. Darrin Erstad is a great example of that.
I agree Erstad is another player who fits in the same mold as jeter. Every great team needs someone like that; the guy who knows what to do in every situation and can handle the pressure when few others can. Thats clutch; thats DJ.

And Im a mets fan....but i dont hate the NYY.
Colorostikse is offline


Old 11-07-2005, 08:00 AM   #4
markshome23

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
This one is sure to spark a debate...but yes, Barry Bonds.

Plus you said athlete...Vick is one hell of an athlete. But I think you meant sports player so I'm stick with Bonds.

First off, the roids. Anyone who says he's not on them is either the biggest homer ever, or he's just a plain fuckin idiot.

Then you've got the fact that no one pitches to him. The common reponse to this is "look what he does when you do pitch to him." Yeah well, if you let him get you so intimidated, you're gonna get fucked up. His fielding/baserunning is waaaay overrated, and his avg. is high because he doesnt get a chance to do much besides HR (which not to mention he has one of the shortest RF's to hit into ever) or walk.
markshome23 is offline


Old 11-18-2005, 08:00 AM   #5
Smittoh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
627
Senior Member
Default
This one is sure to spark a debate...but yes, Barry Bonds.

Plus you said athlete...Vick is one hell of an athlete. But I think you meant sports player so I'm stick with Bonds.

First off, the roids. Anyone who says he's not on them is either the biggest homer ever, or he's just a plain fuckin idiot.

Then you've got the fact that no one pitches to him. The common reponse to this is "look what he does when you do pitch to him." Yeah well, if you let him get you so intimidated, you're gonna get fucked up. His fielding/baserunning is waaaay overrated, and his avg. is high because he doesnt get a chance to do much besides HR (which not to mention he has one of the shortest RF's to hit into ever) or walk.
The last time I check hitting over 700 homeruns is a pretty hard thing to do. So, even if he did do roids' he still had to swing the bat. If they want to take his record away then lets take Ruth and Aaron because they played in a era where the ballparks were smaller, and then take away McGuires because he was a user of roids'. The most overrated player in sports is Tom Brady. He would not have any super bowl wins with out a kicker and defense. Any Qb could win a super bowl with that style of offense and that defense that they had when they won both super bowls.
Smittoh is offline


Old 11-18-2005, 08:00 AM   #6
searkibia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
554
Senior Member
Default
Keyshawn Johnson. Made out to be great for a number of years and was never close to being great.
searkibia is offline


Old 11-18-2005, 08:00 AM   #7
VioletttaJosetta

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
347
Senior Member
Default
As an athelete M Vick is superb. As a football player, he stinks
VioletttaJosetta is offline


Old 11-20-2005, 08:00 AM   #8
Sheelldaw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
432
Senior Member
Default
Let me repeat: Michael Vick = the next Kordell Stewart. Keyshawn is also overrated, but he comes up wih enough good plays to outrank Vick, although it's pretty close. Vick gets more hype.
Sheelldaw is offline


Old 11-25-2005, 08:00 AM   #9
Fsfkkkjz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
- He's the team's leading rusher, which is just as much a reflection of his skills as it is of
Dunn and Duckett's lack of skills

- His wide receivers are: Peerless Price, Dez White, Brian Finneran, and Michael Jenkins

- His offensive line consists of: Kevin Shaffer, Roberto Garza, Todd McClure, Kynan
Forney, and Todd Weiner. Yet people want him to be a pocket passer. What pocket?
These guys couldn't block me, let alone NFL defensive linemen.

The only QB in the NFL that has a worse supporting cast is A.J. Feeley. Even the 49ers have better offensive personnel than the Falcons.
- Dunn and Duckett are fine. The zone blocking scheme Alex Gibbs runs is far and away the best in the nfl but the lack of talent there prevents it from being run as effieciently as it could be. None the less both Dunn and Duckett are over 4.0 per carry so it cant be as terrible as you say it is. The worst OL this year belongs to NYG. Miami isnt far behind here but its mainly at LT and C where they get beaten badly.

- The Wrs are weak in ATL no question there. Price cant live up to his contract, White hasnt emereged, Finnerean is what he is; a nice 3rd down guy, and Jenkins is still a rookie. There are/were worse though...like Phillys wrs last year, SF this year etc.

- As far as Miami's supporting cast; the wrs are stallions: Booker and Chambers + TE McMichael. Its the OL and lack of a running game that have hurt that offense in addition to the god awful QB play.

http://sports.espn.go.com/nfl/teamstats?team=atl
Fsfkkkjz is offline


Old 12-01-2005, 08:00 AM   #10
xkQCaS4w

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
Nope, no one I can think of.

Dude is a phenominal athlete don't get me wrong, but C'MON. Against the Cheifs defense(if you can call it that) you complete 33% of your passes?

Slash #2 for sure!
xkQCaS4w is offline


Old 12-09-2005, 08:00 AM   #11
attackDoold

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
548
Senior Member
Default
I agree about Jeter...he's not overrated, not by a long-shot. In fact, A-Rod is more overrated than Jeter.

As far as the whole average thing goes...I know that walks have no direct effect on average. What I'm saying is that if he was pitched to more, I'm sure his numbers wouldn't be the same because he'll be in different situations.

And I still don't know why they walk Bonds so much, but don't pitch around guys like Pujols, Thome, Ramirez, etc. and so forth.
There are two differences between Bonds and those guys: you rarely see Bonds chase bad pitches, and none of those guys have hit 73 homers in 476 ABs.

And the right field line may be short at 305, but any stadium where the gap is over 400 feet deep should not be considered a total joke. And SBC Park has a 103 park factor for '04, so it's not Coors Field or The Ballpark (120 and 111, respectively).
attackDoold is offline


Old 12-09-2005, 08:00 AM   #12
Wmshyrga

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
494
Senior Member
Default
Second, take away the home runs from bonds and he still hit what .360? 370? and thats taking into account how carefully people pitch to him, how few good pitches he sees and how few actual official at bats he has. this guy is a tremendous athlete, and i haven't seen anyone with an eye for the strike zone like him since Tony Gwynn. he may not have hit as many home runs without the steroids but he would still be one of the most dangerous hitters in baseball
I have to disagree with you on part of that. He's does see a lot of good pitches. Why? Because he only gets pitched to when he can't be walked. If he can't be walked, they're not gonna throw him junk, they're gonna give him stuff that's at least close. Plus, these guys get so afraid of him that they make more mistakes. And let's face it, a hitter can tell if a pitcher is afraid of making a mistake. But a guy like Schilling, RJ, Clemens, etc. isn't gonna have that problem. More pitches need to grow a sack and just pitch to him...the same for the managers.
Wmshyrga is offline


Old 12-11-2005, 08:00 AM   #13
Catalogov

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
494
Senior Member
Default
This one is sure to spark a debate...but yes, Barry Bonds.

Plus you said athlete...Vick is one hell of an athlete. But I think you meant sports player so I'm stick with Bonds.

First off, the roids. Anyone who says he's not on them is either the biggest homer ever, or he's just a plain fuckin idiot.

Then you've got the fact that no one pitches to him. The common reponse to this is "look what he does when you do pitch to him." Yeah well, if you let him get you so intimidated, you're gonna get fucked up. His fielding/baserunning is waaaay overrated, and his avg. is high because he doesnt get a chance to do much besides HR (which not to mention he has one of the shortest RF's to hit into ever) or walk.
I'd reword that from "athlete" to "football player" JayGlo. Noone can deny how good of an athlete he is, but as far as being a QB...he's overrated as hell
Catalogov is offline


Old 12-16-2005, 08:00 AM   #14
intmarkworkk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
This one is sure to spark a debate...but yes, Barry Bonds.

Plus you said athlete...Vick is one hell of an athlete. But I think you meant sports player so I'm stick with Bonds.

First off, the roids. Anyone who says he's not on them is either the biggest homer ever, or he's just a plain fuckin idiot.

Then you've got the fact that no one pitches to him. The common reponse to this is "look what he does when you do pitch to him." Yeah well, if you let him get you so intimidated, you're gonna get fucked up. His fielding/baserunning is waaaay overrated, and his avg. is high because he doesnt get a chance to do much besides HR (which not to mention he has one of the shortest RF's to hit into ever) or walk.
He is one of the best fielding LF's of all time. I don't know how you can say he's overrated there. Same thing with the baserunning. You have to remember he's not as young as he used to be. As far as his home field is concerned, I hear it's one of the hardest to hit out in baseball. Granted the only time I watch a game is if its Philly so I don't see him play all that often.

As far as the athletic thing goes. Yeah there are alot of people that are athletic, but that doesn't make them a good athlete.
intmarkworkk is offline


Old 12-29-2005, 08:00 AM   #15
Butiqueso

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
488
Senior Member
Default
Derek Jeter.
How can you call Jeter overrated when he's been a mighty big cog in the Yankees' World Series victories?

The greatest players show up when the pressure is at its highest and the spotlight is the brightest.

Gotta disagree with you on this one. And I hate the Yankees.
Butiqueso is offline


Old 01-03-2006, 08:00 AM   #16
Nautilus

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
Roy Jones and Oscar De La Hoya

roy made a career out of beating scrubs.

and the highest grossing pay per view matches were all oscar LOSSES (tyson had a claim in that highest grossing losses on ppv too). who has oscar beaten worth mentioning in a while? Vargas was the last notable one. Where is Vargas now?before that the biggest name was Camacho...as an old fart. 2 of oscars 'wins' over notables (Quarte and Whittaker) were extremely suspect at best. he REALLY lost both of those fights. as a matter of fact, stevie wonder could see that he REALLY lost that fight before his loss to Hopkins. What was that guys name? that's the point exactly


**Edited--political statement deleted by Treypops**
huh??? you deleted something i wrote because it was a political statement? WTF? i can't even remember what I typed that might have been borderline. i'm not known for posting distasteful stuff. what did I type that warranted a deletion???
Nautilus is offline


Old 01-09-2006, 08:00 AM   #17
kabelshik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
306
Senior Member
Default
Kordell sucked period.

Sucky QB - Slash - Sucky RB - Slash Sucky WR
hey he did win ST player of the week for punting for the ravins
kabelshik is offline


Old 01-15-2006, 08:00 AM   #18
saerensenatljn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
586
Senior Member
Default
Yep, Vick is still overrated. I get more than my fair share of people who credit him for the Falcons record and refuse to acknowledge the existence of the Falcons D.

Perhaps another sub 50% completion percentage for under 70 yards, no TDs, another fumble (Leads the NFL in this category) and interceptions will help people realize he's a running back under center.
saerensenatljn is offline


Old 01-16-2006, 08:00 AM   #19
E4qC1qQ5

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
I'm surprised nobody has brought up Alge Crumpler for the Falcons. I mean, he is a pro bowl TE, after all.
You mean that he's overrated? If so, I'd have to disagree with you on that. Crumpler is as good as any hype he gets.
E4qC1qQ5 is offline


Old 01-16-2006, 08:00 AM   #20
GoveMoony

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
470
Senior Member
Default
I agree about Jeter...he's not overrated, not by a long-shot. In fact, A-Rod is more overrated than Jeter.

As far as the whole average thing goes...I know that walks have no direct effect on average. What I'm saying is that if he was pitched to more, I'm sure his numbers wouldn't be the same because he'll be in different situations.

And I still don't know why they walk Bonds so much, but don't pitch around guys like Pujols, Thome, Ramirez, etc. and so forth.
GoveMoony is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:32 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity