DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/)
-   American Football (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/american-football/)
-   -   The Chicago Bears (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/american-football/173258-chicago-bears.html)

yasmin 12-15-2006 03:50 PM

The Chicago Bears
 
Will not represent the NFC in the Superbowl this season. I bet $500 sullies on it. Why? Oh I don't even know where to start:

-Rex Grossman
-Terribly weak schedule (when they played strong teams, they lost. They beat Seattle, but in light of recent occurances, can one really call Seattle a strong team? I don't)
-They finish their season against 3 of the weakest teams in the entire league. They will likely bench starters in the final 2 games once HOF is wrapped up. They will go into the playoffs cold.
-The "Don't want to play the Bears at Soldier Field in January" BS is a complete myth. Don't agree? Tell me the last time the Bears have won a playoff game at home. I'll wait. *silence*
-Rex Grossman

The Bears are possibly the biggest frauds at 11-2 that this league has seen in a long time. Another Soldier Field playoff game embarrassment is on the horizon, and it's not that I'm excited to see it.

The Saints are your NFC SB rep.

BruceCroucshs 12-15-2006 03:52 PM

Quote:

Will not represent the NFC in the Superbowl this season. I bet $500 sullies on it. Why? Oh I don't even know where to start:

-Rex Grossman
-Terribly weak schedule (when they played strong teams, they lost. They beat Seattle, but in light of recent occurances, can one really call Seattle a strong team? I don't)
-They finish their season against 3 of the weakest teams in the entire league. They will likely bench starters in the final 2 games once HOF is wrapped up. They will go into the playoffs cold.
-The "Don't want to play the Bears at Soldier Field in January" BS is a complete myth. Don't agree? Tell me the last time the Bears have won a playoff game at home. I'll wait. *silence*
-Rex Grossman

The Bears are possibly the biggest frauds at 11-2 that this league has seen in a long time. Another Soldier Field playoff game embarrassment is on the horizon, and it's not that I'm excited to see it.

The Saints are your NFC SB rep.
Wow. Ok, I will bet but you have to give me Vegas odds. Also, I only have about $150.

patuvammnogoo 12-15-2006 03:53 PM

Quote:

Will not represent the NFC in the Superbowl this season. I bet $500 sullies on it. Why? Oh I don't even know where to start:

-Rex Grossman
-Terribly weak schedule (when they played strong teams, they lost. They beat Seattle, but in light of recent occurances, can one really call Seattle a strong team? I don't)
-They finish their season against 3 of the weakest teams in the entire league. They will likely bench starters in the final 2 games once HOF is wrapped up. They will go into the playoffs cold.
-The "Don't want to play the Bears at Soldier Field in January" BS is a complete myth. Don't agree? Tell me the last time the Bears have won a playoff game at home. I'll wait. *silence*
-Rex Grossman

The Bears are possibly the biggest frauds at 11-2 that this league has seen in a long time. Another Soldier Field playoff game embarrassment is on the horizon, and it's not that I'm excited to see it.

The Saints are your NFC SB rep.
One word:

Tuna.

alskdjreyfd 12-15-2006 03:54 PM

Quote:

One word:

Tuna.
Not if they have to play NO again.

juyrett 12-15-2006 03:56 PM

Quote:

Not if they have to play NO again.
Adjustments can be made.

KernJetenue 12-15-2006 03:57 PM

Quote:

Adjustments can be made.
True.

But they didn't do a very good job adjusting the first time they played

avarberickibe 12-15-2006 04:17 PM

Quote:

Will not represent the NFC in the Superbowl this season. I bet $500 sullies on it. Why? Oh I don't even know where to start:

-Rex Grossman
-Terribly weak schedule (when they played strong teams, they lost. They beat Seattle, but in light of recent occurances, can one really call Seattle a strong team? I don't)
-They finish their season against 3 of the weakest teams in the entire league. They will likely bench starters in the final 2 games once HOF is wrapped up. They will go into the playoffs cold.
-The "Don't want to play the Bears at Soldier Field in January" BS is a complete myth. Don't agree? Tell me the last time the Bears have won a playoff game at home. I'll wait. *silence*
-Rex Grossman

The Bears are possibly the biggest frauds at 11-2 that this league has seen in a long time. Another Soldier Field playoff game embarrassment is on the horizon, and it's not that I'm excited to see it.

The Saints are your NFC SB rep.
Tell me the last time New Orleans has won a playoff game on the road.

Please share with the class your answer.

Your argument is a fraud.

sXVUOUVC 12-15-2006 05:35 PM

Quote:

Tell me the last time New Orleans has won a playoff game on the road.

Please share with the class your answer.

Your argument is a fraud.
Ok. You win. The Saints have never won a playoff game on the road.

So what? That really doesn't make my argument a fraud. The Bears losing playoff games at Soldier Field wasn't the foundation of my argument anyway.

The Saints have something the Bears don't have: an offense. The #1 ranked offense in the NFC, as a matter of fact. And when you've played teams with a respectable offense, you've lost.

I'm telling you right now, sure as shit sticks to a blanket and stinks, the Bears will not advance to the Superbowl in February of 2007.

standaman 12-15-2006 05:56 PM

Quote:

Ok. You win. The Saints have never won a playoff game on the road.

So what? That really doesn't make my argument a fraud. The Bears losing playoff games at Soldier Field wasn't the foundation of my argument anyway.

The Saints have something the Bears don't have: an offense. The #1 ranked offense in the NFC, as a matter of fact. And when you've played teams with a respectable offense, you've lost.

I'm telling you right now, sure as shit sticks to a blanket and stinks, the Bears will not advance to the Superbowl in February of 2007.
One could also argue that the Bears have something the Saints don't have and that is defense, Bears 2nd in pts/g compared to New Orleans 17th pts/g.

When it comes to offense the Bears have 31 offensive touchdowns and the Saints have 39 offensive touchdowns and the Bears have 26 fg compared to Saints 19.

gambleingsites 12-15-2006 06:03 PM

An interesting stat:

The Bears' opponents have had a collective 109 penalties for an astounding 884 yards. That is simply insane, and the Bears actually lead the league in that unique stat.

So suffice it to say that I'm adding this to my platform. The Bears' opponents have a propensity to shoot themselves in their own feet, and they beat themselves more than the Bears beat them.

I'd go farther to say that in the playoffs, teams typically get much more disciplined and penalties are far fewer. I don't think teams will be making such critical mental errors when a Championship run is on the line.

imawlBoli 12-15-2006 06:06 PM

Quote:

An interesting stat:

The Bears' opponents have had a collective 109 penalties for an astounding 884 yards. That is simply insane, and the Bears actually lead the league in that unique stat.

So suffice it to say that I'm adding this to my platform. The Bears' opponents have a propensity to shoot themselves in their own feet, and they beat themselves more than the Bears beat them.

I'd go farther to say that in the playoffs, teams typically get much more disciplined and penalties are far fewer. I don't think teams will be making such critical mental errors when a Championship run is on the line.
REACH! REACH!

Ambassador 12-15-2006 06:10 PM

Quote:

Will not represent the NFC in the Superbowl this season. I bet $500 sullies on it. Why? Oh I don't even know where to start:

Rex Grossman

Rex Grossman vs the NFC is 152-263 (A 58% completion clip) with 16 touchdowns vs. 11 picks and is averaging 215 ypg passing....You wanna see some of those numbers in comparison, to say 2003 Jake Delhomme? 2001 Tom Brady? A fan fave for this argument, 2000 Dilfer? How about McNair/Odonnell 99? Shall I really keep going?

-Terribly weak schedule (when they played strong teams, they lost. They beat Seattle, but in light of recent occurances, can one really call Seattle a
strong team? I don't)


Them and every other NFC team. Except no other team has gone 9-0 against the conference and average 31.56 points per game. New Orleans sits at 8-1 averaging 29.33 points per game...So let's see...We average more points vs. conference opponents and they don't have a defense to hold a candle to ours...AND they'll play in Soldier.

-They finish their season against 3 of the weakest teams in the entire league. They will likely bench starters in the final 2 games once HOF is wrapped up. They will go into the playoffs cold.

That's right...cuz that totally stopped your own 2004 Eagles from going to the Super Bowl....Pure conjecture: an argument based upon theory.



-The "Don't want to play the Bears at Soldier Field in January" BS is a complete myth. Don't agree? Tell me the last time the Bears have won a playoff game at home. I'll wait. *silence*

I refuted this in a prior post. If you want to talk playoff history, spare me any kind of New Orleans argument.

-Rex Grossman

I've addressed this already.

The Bears are possibly the biggest frauds at 11-2 that this league has seen in a long time. Another Soldier Field playoff game embarrassment is on the horizon, and it's not that I'm excited to see it.

You read enough mediots to emulate their shock value reporting, that's fa sho.

The Saints are your NFC SB rep.

F*ck them.
...

FallJimerks 12-15-2006 06:13 PM

Quote:

An interesting stat:

The Bears' opponents have had a collective 109 penalties for an astounding 884 yards. That is simply insane, and the Bears actually lead the league in that unique stat.

So suffice it to say that I'm adding this to my platform. The Bears' opponents have a propensity to shoot themselves in their own feet, and they beat themselves more than the Bears beat them.

I'd go farther to say that in the playoffs, teams typically get much more disciplined and penalties are far fewer. I don't think teams will be making such critical mental errors when a Championship run is on the line.
Or it could be that other teams are overwhelmed by our speed and talent and compensate in...other...ways...

But yeah, spin it the way you would like.

Poowssnople 12-15-2006 06:14 PM

It's not like teams can't move the ball against the Bears defense. It's just the Bears are well-coached to try and strip the ball on almost every tackle they make.

Avoid turnovers against them, and they won't win.

Annewsded 12-15-2006 06:14 PM

Quote:

REACH! REACH!
Reach as it may well be, but come on, even Bears fans can't look that stat in the eye and not say to themselves "well that's interesting".

I mean come on, for whatever reason (maybe its some sick power Bears players have -- although I doubt it) opposing teams just lack discipline against the Bears.

I contend that won't happen in the playoffs, and I contend that the Saints most definitely won't, as they actually are 2nd best in the NFC with only 69 team penalties.

AngelinaLip 12-15-2006 06:15 PM

Quote:

Or it could be that other teams are overwhelmed by our speed and talent and compensate in...other...ways...

But yeah, spin it the way you would like.
http://i.walmart.com/i/p/00/01/21/04...12_215X215.jpg

Faigokilix 12-15-2006 06:16 PM

The Bears are the lesser of 3 evils that actually have a shot, so I hope they represent the NFC as this year's Super Bowl loser.

SashaLionx 12-15-2006 06:16 PM

Quote:

It's not like teams can't move the ball against the Bears defense. It's just the Bears are well-coached to try and strip the ball on almost every tackle they make.

Avoid turnovers against them, and they won't win.
Actually I take that back.

The Pats had about 6 of them and still came out with a win.

Personally, I think a Bears/NO matchup would be sweet.

Who holds the home field tie breaker if New Orleans and Chicago both finish 12-4 somehow?

spaxiaroorbes 12-15-2006 06:18 PM

Quote:

It's not like teams can't move the ball against the Bears defense. It's just the Bears are well-coached to try and strip the ball on almost every tackle they make.

Avoid turnovers against them, and they won't win.
I love this argument. Rex will be blitzed like crazy and outmatched by our opponents...thus he will turn the ball over and we will lose.

Oh, by the way, that Bears D...Just don't turn the ball over against them...Don't mind that they're one of the best in the game...

Two sides of the same mouth.

If we avoid turnovers, no NFC team comes within 2 touchdowns bucko. Period. If they avoid turnovers, MAYBE they squeak one out.

prmwsinfo 12-15-2006 06:19 PM

Quote:

It's not like teams can't move the ball against the Bears defense. It's just the Bears are well-coached to try and strip the ball on almost every tackle they make.

Avoid turnovers against them, and they won't win.
I will say that the Bears' turnover ratio is sick. Pure sick. And naturally, if they can manage to maintain that in the playoffs, I will look like an ass.

But again, I contend that they won't be gifted by other teams' sloppiness in the playoffs like they have been in the regular season. When opposing teams minimize penalties and hang on to the football, the Bears lose the upper hand.


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2