December 12, 2004 - Minnesota Vikings vs. Seattle Seahawks - DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

**xtc2d6u8** · 10-13-2005, 07:00 AM

BRIAN WILLIAMS BABY!!!

INT!!!!

That could be exactly what we need....points are a must here..at least a FG since we're starting in Seattle territory.

**gopsbousperie** · 10-15-2005, 07:00 AM

I can't believe how many times I've seen Culpepper be dead to rights and he just runs away from pressure like it isn't even there.

Doesn't matter who it is, either. They should have a category for quarterbacks: SACKS AVOIDED.

**Loopyjr** · 10-20-2005, 07:00 AM

The postive from that Seattle TD was that at least there was a Viking's defender within ten yards....that's better then the Engram TD right?

**gusunsuth** · 10-24-2005, 07:00 AM

We need a friggen TD here!

Stop shooting ourselves in the foot.

**sjdflghd** · 10-24-2005, 07:00 AM

That would be an interesting category, how would you call a play "sack avoided" though...what would be your parameters?

Well, I'd have to think about that. But if the quarterback has no right to still be alive and gain positive yardage, either scrambling or passing, I'd say that is an avoided sack.

If the play results in just an incomplete pass or no loss of yardage, maybe it'd be called something else.

Whaddya think, PG?

**RgtrsKfR** · 10-25-2005, 07:00 AM

Oh...btw...GO LIONS!

C'mon PG, don't you want the Vikings to do in the Packers and not have another team do your dirty work?

Oh, by the way, Go Seahawks.

**gundos** · 10-26-2005, 07:00 AM

caught a break there, lets see what your D can do. 1 TD for peyton already, fyi.

**atmowasia** · 10-31-2005, 07:00 AM

Been very impressed with our special teams coverage today

**ForumMasta** · 11-02-2005, 07:00 AM

I can't believe how many times I've seen Culpepper be dead to rights and he just runs away from pressure like it isn't even there.

Doesn't matter who it is, either. They should have a category for quarterbacks: SACKS AVOIDED.

That would be an interesting category, how would you call a play "sack avoided" though...what would be your parameters?

**BenWired306** · 11-03-2005, 07:00 AM

anyone else surprised we didn't go for 2 and make it a 7 point game?

maybe it's too early in the game to play the numbers like that.

Yeah, I did, PG. Made sense to me. Why not? Doesn't look like moving the ball 80 yards is going to be a problem, muchless 2.

**Enrobrorb** · 11-04-2005, 07:00 AM

Was that challenge REALLY needed?
We have a QB who's 250+ pounds, just sneak it.....fool.
GO TO THE NCAA!!!!

**dianakroshXX** · 11-04-2005, 07:00 AM

hooked it, vikes D holds, or more accurately, Seattle holds themselves.

**JewJoleSole** · 11-06-2005, 07:00 AM

I'm loving those dance moves by Smith.

Doesn't look tired to me.

**hictchewisa** · 11-08-2005, 07:00 AM

what a horrible spot on that play

**opdirorg** · 11-08-2005, 07:00 AM

48 yard FG is GOOD! 3-0 Vikes

**SOgLak** · 11-10-2005, 07:00 AM

Stupid challenge...yeah it'll be overturned....but doesn't Tice have faith in this offense to pick up 3 inches? It's only 3rd down...at least this won't cost us at all

**HaroTaure** · 11-13-2005, 07:00 AM

I guess I just had to say please....TD Onterrio!

This game is going to be a shootout...but Seattle doesn't look like they came to play on Defense at all and we have a 10 point lead...I like our chances.

**arcalmanard** · 11-16-2005, 07:00 AM

Smith - 9 carries for 52 yards

Bennett - 2 carries for 4 yards...

Who should play?

**TheBest-Host** · 11-20-2005, 07:00 AM

was there ANYONE who didn't think Daunte could do that QB sneak/dive and pick up the first?

**VomsVomaMew** · 11-21-2005, 07:00 AM

I just about choked on my christmas cookie there....

what a dangerous play inside the 20...thank you Corey Withrow

10-13-2005, 07:00 AM	#1
xtc2d6u8 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 521 Senior Member	BRIAN WILLIAMS BABY!!! INT!!!! That could be exactly what we need....points are a must here..at least a FG since we're starting in Seattle territory. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-15-2005, 07:00 AM	#2
gopsbousperie Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 431 Senior Member	I can't believe how many times I've seen Culpepper be dead to rights and he just runs away from pressure like it isn't even there. Doesn't matter who it is, either. They should have a category for quarterbacks: SACKS AVOIDED. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-20-2005, 07:00 AM	#3
Loopyjr Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 481 Senior Member	The postive from that Seattle TD was that at least there was a Viking's defender within ten yards....that's better then the Engram TD right? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-24-2005, 07:00 AM	#4
gusunsuth Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 495 Senior Member	We need a friggen TD here! Stop shooting ourselves in the foot. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-24-2005, 07:00 AM	#5
sjdflghd Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 498 Senior Member	That would be an interesting category, how would you call a play "sack avoided" though...what would be your parameters? Well, I'd have to think about that. But if the quarterback has no right to still be alive and gain positive yardage, either scrambling or passing, I'd say that is an avoided sack. If the play results in just an incomplete pass or no loss of yardage, maybe it'd be called something else. Whaddya think, PG? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-25-2005, 07:00 AM	#6
RgtrsKfR Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 487 Senior Member	Oh...btw...GO LIONS! C'mon PG, don't you want the Vikings to do in the Packers and not have another team do your dirty work? Oh, by the way, Go Seahawks. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-26-2005, 07:00 AM	#7
gundos Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 422 Senior Member	caught a break there, lets see what your D can do. 1 TD for peyton already, fyi. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

10-31-2005, 07:00 AM	#8
atmowasia Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 416 Senior Member	Been very impressed with our special teams coverage today Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-02-2005, 07:00 AM	#9
ForumMasta Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 518 Senior Member	I can't believe how many times I've seen Culpepper be dead to rights and he just runs away from pressure like it isn't even there. Doesn't matter who it is, either. They should have a category for quarterbacks: SACKS AVOIDED. That would be an interesting category, how would you call a play "sack avoided" though...what would be your parameters? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-03-2005, 07:00 AM	#10
BenWired306 Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 471 Senior Member	anyone else surprised we didn't go for 2 and make it a 7 point game? maybe it's too early in the game to play the numbers like that. Yeah, I did, PG. Made sense to me. Why not? Doesn't look like moving the ball 80 yards is going to be a problem, muchless 2. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-04-2005, 07:00 AM	#11
Enrobrorb Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 389 Senior Member	Was that challenge REALLY needed? We have a QB who's 250+ pounds, just sneak it.....fool. GO TO THE NCAA!!!! Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-04-2005, 07:00 AM	#12
dianakroshXX Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 468 Senior Member	hooked it, vikes D holds, or more accurately, Seattle holds themselves. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-06-2005, 07:00 AM	#13
JewJoleSole Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 384 Senior Member	I'm loving those dance moves by Smith. Doesn't look tired to me. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-08-2005, 07:00 AM	#14
hictchewisa Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 447 Senior Member	what a horrible spot on that play Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-08-2005, 07:00 AM	#15
opdirorg Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 445 Senior Member	48 yard FG is GOOD! 3-0 Vikes Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests)

11-10-2005, 07:00 AM	#16
SOgLak Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 377 Senior Member	Stupid challenge...yeah it'll be overturned....but doesn't Tice have faith in this offense to pick up 3 inches? It's only 3rd down...at least this won't cost us at all Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-13-2005, 07:00 AM	#17
HaroTaure Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 404 Senior Member	I guess I just had to say please....TD Onterrio! This game is going to be a shootout...but Seattle doesn't look like they came to play on Defense at all and we have a 10 point lead...I like our chances. Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-16-2005, 07:00 AM	#18
arcalmanard Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 391 Senior Member	Smith - 9 carries for 52 yards Bennett - 2 carries for 4 yards... Who should play? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-20-2005, 07:00 AM	#19
TheBest-Host Join Date Oct 2005 Posts 463 Senior Member	was there ANYONE who didn't think Daunte could do that QB sneak/dive and pick up the first? Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote

11-21-2005, 07:00 AM	#20
VomsVomaMew Join Date Nov 2005 Posts 470 Senior Member	I just about choked on my christmas cookie there.... what a dangerous play inside the 20...thank you Corey Withrow Share Share this post on Digg Del.icio.us Technorati Twitter
	Quote