Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
Okay guys, here's a 1920x1200 version, wide screen users just resize, and people with 4:3 or 5:4 (1280x1024) monitors just need to crop and resize. I was going to post a 1600x1200 version but I wanted to let people decide where to crop it.
![]() BTW this pic is taken looking back towards my house from the large volcano in most of my previous pics. At this point I am at the end of the road, which terminates at around the 8,000 ft (2450m) level, the mountain tops out at 14,179 feet ( 4322m). During mid winter there is normally 30 feet or more of snow where I'm taking the pic from. BTW the mountain is Mt. Shasta, one of the largest strato (cone) volcanoes in the world. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
Okay guys, here's a 1920x1200 version, wide screen users just resize, and people with 4:3 or 5:4 (1280x1024) monitors just need to crop and resize. I was going to post a 1600x1200 version but I wanted to let people decide where to crop it. - Levels, local contrast adjust, noise reduction and just a touch of sharpening. Its a really great photo - I just felt that it had a slight grey-sheen to it that could be lifted off in post-processing: http://www.picturepunk.com/photos/shastafmwidejk5_2.jpg The difference is quite subtle, so you might need to load them up on seperate tabs and flick between them. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Hope you don't mind - I took the libery of doing a few minor bits of processing in Photoshop: |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|