LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-02-2007, 05:58 AM   #21
Lt_Apple

Join Date
Dec 2008
Posts
4,489
Senior Member
Default
IR was asked to do Kalki which he readily refused and IR does nt need MR to prove...but MR cannot do a thing without IR or ARR.
I guess Kalki is by KB... but point is taken anyway and is true for KB as well.
Lt_Apple is offline


Old 01-02-2007, 06:02 AM   #22
Paul Bunyan

Join Date
Jul 2007
Age
58
Posts
4,495
Senior Member
Default
IMO, any director or MD needs a popular MD or director to first become famous. Later on, they can move away to forge different partnerships or teams... like what MR did initially with IR and then moved on with ARR. There's nothing wrong in it. It becomes a topic of subjectiveness when one starts claiming that partnership1 was the best than partnership2 and vice versa.

If a director is able to extract the best out of an MD, and if an MD is able to give the best to a director, aint it good for the industry all together, and a treat for audience like us?!!!
Paul Bunyan is offline


Old 01-02-2007, 03:39 PM   #23
doctorzlo

Join Date
Jun 2006
Posts
4,488
Senior Member
Default
Originally Posted by Hulkster For a Rakkama Kaiyai thatthu there is a chaiyya chaiyya...spanish tango music vs indian rock music ..i think all of us IR and ARR fans should agree that both are different and cannot be compared...instead of ARR if VS was the one leading than we can compare since both are WCM..but this is different case.
What do we have for a "Sundari" or "Mandram Vandha" ?? Sundari...Snehithaney and Mandram vandha wunt have such a song since for that situation only IR has got it..ARR is yet to get such a situation.
doctorzlo is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:59 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity