Reply to Thread New Thread |
01-02-2006, 08:00 AM | #1 |
|
|
|
01-31-2006, 08:00 AM | #2 |
|
I'm the only one eligible to do the deed, I have a superior gene in the area of advanced rational thinking. Rational? Thinking? Based on previous posts I doubt most of the above, but I can guarantee the best service you can pay for. Advanced - not many people relaise that the risk of AIDS is omnipresent, I take this risk - that's adnaced thinking - yes? Rational - cheaper by far to let me impregante 20 women, than an airfare? Not to mention the cost of bar fines, hotel rooms, condoms - oops we won't need them, and ancillary costs such as pregnancy tests Thinking that this is and always will be a troll |
|
03-08-2006, 07:19 PM | #3 |
|
|
|
03-09-2006, 04:25 AM | #4 |
|
|
|
03-08-2008, 10:05 PM | #6 |
|
part time child?
as a real parent, your job is never part time. i totally understand your view, but how can you do that to a child. im sure every child deserves the 100% life with their parent. it's kinda selfish to be like... 'i'll see the child part time of the year.' how would that child feel knowing that their parent chose to be with them part time? you know? im not trying to put you in a weird position, i just want to state what i think of the topic post. i really hope that things work out for you. somehow, i just feel as if there's no 100% commitment, then it's kinda like... i dont know how to say it. i dont know. im thinking too much. anyways. having someone have the kid isnt wrong. i guess what bugs me is the after. anyways. good luck to you. i hope things go well for you. take care. and i do apologize if i am totally bleh. im totally off topic. GOOD LUCK. |
|
03-08-2008, 10:51 PM | #7 |
|
|
|
03-09-2008, 04:32 AM | #8 |
|
part time child? |
|
03-08-2009, 02:46 PM | #9 |
|
Men do not get the equal choices woman have to spend time with there children, that is the discrimination against men in our society, some thing that disgusts me immensely. I on the other hand want to exercise a choice of getting a child for at least 50% of the time, that is a better deal than most married men who get to spend less than 10% of there time with there child. |
|
09-21-2012, 05:03 PM | #10 |
|
|
|
09-21-2012, 06:58 PM | #11 |
|
Well with Robin and I, you have too vols.
then have a nanny look after my child in Thailand part time, Yea and the other part, you could get a ten cup and the kid could pay his half of the support. and be an heir to the thrown, .. PS. my usage of the English language is better than that, I wrote it so Paul could understand it.. |
|
09-21-2012, 07:17 PM | #13 |
|
|
|
09-21-2012, 07:22 PM | #14 |
|
|
|
09-21-2012, 10:15 PM | #15 |
|
"I would prefer an heir to the thrown, than to just give every thing away to strangers."
No problem, I'll pop over and buy you a beer, you can buy me one back, then we'd be mates, not strangers. You could leave all the money in a trust for me to dish out to the subsequent heirs that I produce and proclaim them to be yours. This could be a real win/win. You get to give all your money to heirs and I get to produce them for free. I have a couple of prospective Mums in mind. Like |
|
09-22-2012, 03:45 AM | #17 |
|
|
|
09-22-2012, 04:04 AM | #18 |
|
Now I don't want a child full time, basically because I don't like kids all that much, I can tolerate them in short dosages and may even grow to enjoy having kids, but coming from such a small family my self with no children in the family, I really don't know if I will like having children or not, it may in fact be the biggest gamble in my life not knowing how I would handle having children. It would be nice to know I have a close living relative once my mother is gone, also I would prefer an heir to the thrown, than to just give every thing away to strangers. BTW, how much money are you talking about? |
|
09-22-2012, 04:37 AM | #19 |
|
I was thinking I'm not getting any younger and my only close living relative is my mother, I thought it's about time I got an heir to the thrown. Now I have been stung by too many woman in my life to consider marriage, but I have been hearing on the news lately about famous people like Madonna who have either adopted a foreign child while being single, while having the help of a nanny to look after the child or have a surrogate mother produce there child for them. I would prefer some kind of genetic link so I would go for the surrogate mother to have my child. Now I have a plan, so is it feasible or legal in Thailand. The plan is to have a surrogate mother have my child, then have a nanny look after my child in Thailand part time, while I can go over and visit the child or the child can come back and see me in Australia part time. Now I don't want a child full time, basically because I don't like kids all that much, I can tolerate them in short dosages and may even grow to enjoy having kids, but coming from such a small family my self with no children in the family, I really don't know if I will like having children or not, it may in fact be the biggest gamble in my life not knowing how I would handle having children. It would be nice to know I have a close living relative once my mother is gone, also I would prefer an heir to the thrown, than to just give every thing away to strangers.
What are your opinions of my plan or do you have personal knowledge of adoption and surrogate law in Thailand. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|