Reply to Thread New Thread |
10-12-2005, 08:00 AM | #1 |
|
|
|
10-25-2005, 08:00 AM | #2 |
|
Kendo is absolutely chock full of "irreconcilable dichotomies". That is, if you chose to look at the world in terms of binary opposites. I think the ultimate aim of (my) kendo is to reach a point where this kind of thinking about things in terms of the perpetual conflict of opposites just melts away...
But to answer David's question, yes, I also find it incredibly natural to bow before fighting. Reigi might be the only way human beings can engage in violent physical conflict without inflaming aggression or hatred. It helps you "keep your eye on the prize" as it were. b |
|
11-12-2005, 08:00 AM | #3 |
|
mina-san konnichiwa~
... why do you people always try to make things look so superstitious? I've never found bowing to be something like "wooo...cultivate your spirit" and stuff. Dear Westerners, please do some east Asia cultural studies... Bow to your opponent = saying "let's practice together + learn" =shaking hands and say "nice to meet you" =saluting by placing your hand to your forehead (in the army) =kiss your friends on their cheeks (okay, for French or Italian etc.) When I was at school, every single morning when a teacher walk into the classroom, the whole class have to stand up ("Kiritsu!!"), and "Rei!" by bowing and say "Good morning Mrs. XX"... THIS IS NOT JUST LIMITED TO JAPANESE AND KENDO!! Oi come on guys! By the way, if you run through the film "The Last Emperor of China", you'll see how the government official BOW to the emperor. All the bows are on the floor with your forehead knocking on the floor (and make a sound!). And please don't quote " The Purpose of Kendo" all the time. They are not the Jedi Codes! |
|
12-03-2005, 08:00 AM | #6 |
|
|
|
01-04-2006, 08:00 AM | #8 |
|
|
|
01-15-2006, 08:00 AM | #9 |
|
|
|
02-03-2006, 08:00 AM | #10 |
|
|
|
02-11-2006, 08:00 AM | #12 |
|
Has anyone taken a look at Japanese culture in general? Let's take a step outside of kendo. How about their government? All the nice nice going on with all the smiling faces but behind the scenes it's business-as-usual with all the back stabbing and dirty dealing in smoke filled rooms. It's no wonder why reigi is so important! Now try to imagine Japan without it? It's all about WA!!!
|
|
02-17-2006, 08:00 AM | #13 |
|
Okaaaaaaaaaaaay... enough with the Jedi mind-sh*t?
********** David J: My mention of the "seemingly irreconcilable dichotomy" was to draw attention to the fact that it's just a fun mental exercise to think about the differences between reigi and hitting a shomen. I didn't mean to imply that there was confusion on my part or on any other kendoka's part. Ultimately, the point of debate that would summarize this dichotomy is: if reigi teaches mutual respect, doesn't it also teach that this mutual respect must preclude mutual violence? To fit it into a dojo situation, I think it's easy to answer this question: no *real* violence is being perpetrated in a dojo. Mingshi: hehehe. Not everyone here is a Westerner! And I wasn't talking exclusively about the Act Of Bowing, but rather the principles behind reigi... Bowing is just a corrollary of these principles, I think, and is a matter of course. |
|
03-03-2006, 08:00 AM | #14 |
|
Hi folks,
I was using the term "reigi" in a broader sense, actually. Of course, I meant the act of bowing and the like, but I also meant the concept of respecting your opponent, etc. I too find it natural to bow to my opponent, but I guess what I was driving at is this: if we were instead using shinken and instead of being my dojo mate, my opponent had the real intent to kill me, would it still feel so natural? I think we find it natural because we are conscious of the fact that our opponent really has no intention of killing (or even hurting) us in the dojo. As to ben's assertion that "reigi might be the only way human beings can engage in violent physical conflict without inflaming aggression or hatred"... Historically, I don't believe reigi was able to prevent aggression or hatred -- if you look at feudal Japan, clansmen routinely killed men of other clans to exact revenge for losses in duels (which would fall under the governance of reigi, no?). In the end, this debate is kind of moot, since it places more emphasis on kendo's martial roots that perhaps is due, forcing closer ties than is perhaps warranted. But nonetheless, it is an interesting thing to think about. Just throwing this out though: perhaps reigi was codified and implemented more as a way of social regulation. Teaching the tenets of respect -- even for one's enemies -- might ultimately reduce the overall probability of people offing each other...? |
|
04-06-2006, 08:00 AM | #16 |
|
http://www.synicon.com.au/sw/ls/sabres.htm
On that note check out the site above... Look at the En guarde Positions part...heh, funky shinais... Peace Meng |
|
04-09-2006, 08:00 AM | #17 |
|
|
|
04-09-2006, 08:00 AM | #18 |
|
Originally posted by Antonin
Indeed, I find his lack of faith ...disturbing.... ok, don't hit me, I'll stop, ouch ouch... A Time for keiko! I better get myself in gear or I won't make it on time, gotta round up the jedi skirt and bamboo saber... (maybe we should have a star wars forum, seems to be a few fans in here ) |
|
05-16-2006, 08:00 AM | #19 |
|
I think I have come up with a plausable reason for the bowing of heads, well I think that both Kendoka's say to each other using their eyes "are you ready for a good bashing from me?" and then they bow to each other in acknowledgement to each other...hmmm...what do you guy's and girl's think?
I think this assertion I have made has a great possibility for debate. |
|
06-04-2006, 08:00 AM | #20 |
|
cklin, interesting assertions. let me just clarify...
"As to ben's assertion that "reigi might be the only way human beings can engage in violent physical conflict without inflaming aggression or hatred"... Historically, I don't believe reigi was able to prevent aggression or hatred -- if you look at feudal Japan, clansmen routinely killed men of other clans to exact revenge for losses in duels (which would fall under the governance of reigi, no?)." I should have made it clear that I was thinking in a modern budo sense, refering to behaviour in a dojo, rather than hypothesising about medieval Japan, which is a millieu of which I have no first hand experience. I have seen situations in the dojo de-escalate from potentially harmful violence down to reasonable sanity just through the application of the authority of reigi, which, although I know it is designed to reinforce a hierarchy, is nevertheless, like a kamidana, an authority with a void at its centre. I suppose this is my partial answer to your final question. I agree that historically reigi was not able to prevent aggression or hatred and it was not my intention to imply that it could have. But I do believe that within the practise of modern kendo, reigi has the ability to ground the practice of violent skills within a humane framework. As to the question whether it would feel so natural if it were "shinken shobu", I think the only answer to that is "who knows?" At such a moment I think it's possible to assume that the ritual of reigi would certainly provide an anchor for a mind swirling with fears and doubts. The best description of the psychology of that moment I have read was I think in the Hagakure. Someone was asked: "When facing an opponent in a life-and-death match, how does one deal with fear?" To which the answer was: "In a life-and-death match, it is like suddenly being plunged into the darkest night. But if you can calm your mind, it is like a hazy moon appearing in the darkness." I think there is something to the idea that, without any metaphysical or religious baggage attached to it, the concept and practice of people being decent to each other does indeed "...reduce the overall probability of people offing each other...?" Which reminds me of something I read after Sept 11: that we see the few grave and horrific acts perpetrated against humanity and worry that our culture is decadent and cruel. But to do that we have to ignore the 10,000 small acts of decency that go unnoticed everyday. Or, as Desmond Morris pointed out, if any other species of higher mammal lived in such concentration and proximity to each other as humans do to other humans, they would almost certainly have torn each other to shreds long ago. I shall now step down from the soapbox... b |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|