Reply to Thread New Thread |
04-05-2007, 11:10 AM | #21 |
|
Here in the US we have seen an enourmous increase in the practice of tameshigiri, sparking the flood of chinese made shinken. I recall reading an interview with Obata sensei in Aikijournal years ago where he was openly critical about the inability of many people to do tameshigiri. While there may have been a few other sword arts actively practicing tameshigiri here in the US, it is my belief that Shinkendo is largely behind most of it.
|
|
04-05-2007, 11:19 AM | #22 |
|
I recall reading an interview with Obata sensei in Aikijournal years ago where he was openly critical about the inability of many people to do tameshigiri. I'm no Iaidoka or Kenjutsu student, but I know screwy-ness and flim-flam when I see it. Seriously, in every demonstration I have seen with him and his footsoldiers..(These guys wear as a uniform; a red, wild-man Kamishimo-like thingee) er I mean students, they either break the stand with the bamboo matt, or miss, repeatedly (even Obata) or they have to chop 2 or three times. Once, two years ago, one of the students hit the stand so hard it flew into the audience. -or was that supposed to happen? and then I was deluged with students shoving Shinkendo flyers in my face. But hey, to each his own I suppose. |
|
04-05-2007, 01:34 PM | #23 |
|
I'm no Iaidoka or Kenjutsu student Just what I said. Get to know some of theses styles and you'll see what it's all about. what you write seems to me like the common problem of someone who only did kendo (or any other style) and compares everything from his experience. I think everyone did this at some point, myself included .
Once, two years ago, one of the students hit the stand so hard it flew into the audience. Never heard about that one. Some kendo teachers have been known to do errors too, tameshigiri included. And you still practice kendo? |
|
04-05-2007, 01:59 PM | #24 |
|
Just what I said. Get to know some of theses styles and you'll see what it's all about. what you write seems to me like the common problem of someone who only did kendo (or any other style) and compares everything from his experience. I think everyone did this at some point, myself included . But everything I've seen of Shinkendo makes me think that Shinkendo is nothing more than commercialized, ninjerly-cult-like-Hollywoodland neo-Samurai-dom-Bullshit, slapped onto a t-shirt and prastic-runchbox, and that Obata is an opportunistic Phil-Elmore-like businessman and Soka-Gakkai-like AssHat. Just my opinion. I'm willing to be proven wrong. |
|
04-05-2007, 05:58 PM | #26 |
|
Sorry, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oENjfg_f2mI |
|
04-05-2007, 08:40 PM | #28 |
|
i agree, while i don't know much about kenjutsu Well I'm not going to repeat myself on this one. Take a look at other styles and read some books (I personnaly recommend Ellis Amdur) you'll see weirder things (Jigen ryu is a classical example). Kendo is representative of some schools of thought, not all.
As for the quote, invite a journalist to your dojo and see what results you get. |
|
04-05-2007, 09:59 PM | #29 |
|
|
|
04-05-2007, 10:15 PM | #30 |
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 12:42 AM | #31 |
|
shin kendo stands for "true kendo", although I have researched Mr. Obata's training background, and his reasosn behind the need to establish a "true" kendo tradition. To me, the kendo and iaido most of us practice,(well as orthodox as we are able to stay). .. ...is (in my definition) Shin Ken Do. |
|
04-06-2007, 01:02 AM | #32 |
|
Personal opinions on Shinkendo ... Shu Ha Ri, the concept was discussed on this board, based on what i understood, how can one access the Ri stage in an art where you can't test on a live and resisting target? |
|
04-06-2007, 01:08 AM | #33 |
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 07:21 AM | #34 |
|
Common mistake.I think that's why some kendo folks don't like the idea (altough many practice shinkendo). Shinkendo is Shinken-do as the way of the true sword, not true kendo.
As for creating a new style. Normaly when you reach Menkyo kaiden you are suppose to have mastered the style and know pretty much all there is to know (although it depends on the ryu) and can start your own one. Obata sensei did. |
|
04-06-2007, 11:09 AM | #35 |
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 11:39 AM | #36 |
|
Well I'm not going to repeat myself on this one. Take a look at other styles and read some books (I personnaly recommend Ellis Amdur) you'll see weirder things (Jigen ryu is a classical example). Just to be clear, it isn't empirical evidence that I'm basing my feelings on, but rather a more of a "gut" feeling, from attending his Hombu Dojo, watching about 5 classess, reading up on Obata, and viewing 4 demos at Weller Court in downtown L.A. on New Years in front of live audiences. They have always appeared sloppy, unprepared and make many mistakes. Does this state that his art is crap? Nope, but again, my Gut says something is fishy. Kendo is representative of some schools of thought, not all. |
|
04-06-2007, 03:14 PM | #37 |
|
First, let me say that it is far much better when you don't make comparaisons with Phil Elmore when you debate. And also good reading, you won't regret it.
A couple of other schools participated in the homogenisation of kendo. But what I meant to say was that some ryu can look like kendo because they share some common roots or influence, but others are light years away. Now I can't comment on what you saw, for the obvious reason that I wasn't there. But let me say that I never saw anything sloppy in what Obata sensei did. Maybe in beginner or intermediate grades students, or when new material was being practiced, but then it's not the same thing and I think we can agree on that. But I agree, humans are prone to make mistakes, this is why there is no 10th dan in kendo, am I right? And to end the debate about comercialisation, everyone has their way of promoting their class, it's their right. Where I practice, we are maybe a bit more conservative on demos. As for Bercy, it's a martial art show, everyone, from aikikai aikido to goju ryu karate was invited there to please the crowd. Obata sensei received good comments from Kyochi Inoue after the show for his performance. And as for the wearing of kamishimo, I have seen this done in koryu, namely the Asayama Ichiden ryu soke. For the use of two swords (for what I understood), it's usualy a training method (like a suburito), as it can be done with a wakisashi too. So the morale of this story, don't jump on conclusions too early. |
|
04-06-2007, 05:42 PM | #38 |
|
|
|
04-06-2007, 05:58 PM | #39 |
|
Thank you for the explanation, if i'm not mistaken under the light of what you said, even some post Sengoku jidai koryu coud've been or are about theory and imitation more than battle-tested applications, or is it a mix of all the above? I would have to say that it was probably a mix. The vast majority of the koryu sword arts teachings are for unarmored combat, sword duels if you will. This is true even in those arts codified before the end of the Sengoku Jidai. This is due to the fact that the sword was, according to the research of Professor Karl Friday, rarely used on the battlefield. I have gotten the feeling from my own reading and research that sword duels were not extremely common, although I have no actual numbers to provide backup for that thought.
Shu Ha Ri, the concept was discussed on this board, based on what i understood, how can one access the Ri stage in an art where you can't test on a live and resisting target? It is not necessary to engage in combat in order to intimately understand the basic underpinnings and ideas of a combat system. I've only been at this for 12 years, but I can watch someone swing a sword and can tell whether their swing would actually cut, whether they are properly balanced for another movement, whether their sword is in a position to follow up, whether they've properly utilized their tanden or just their upper body (which would leave them vulnerable in short order). Give me another twenty or thirty years and I feel I would have enough knowledge to understand what would work and what wouldn't. If everyone had to go out and engage in a sword duel in order to learn, there would be far fewer schools listed in the Bugei Ryuha Daijiten. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|