Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
Thanks for the correction on the habaki, Paul. Forgot about that. If that's the case, the shinai is a 2.6 which is long but not stupid long.
The shinai tsuka is longer for two reasons, in my opinion: 1. The kote are bulky. I don't think there's enough room on a standard-sized iaito tsuka to hold with kote. 2. To allow extra leverage for all the waza you can do with shinai that you can't with steel. |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
Thanks for the correction on the habaki, Paul. Forgot about that. If that's the case, the shinai is a 2.6 which is long but not stupid long. (in case the list is long just list a couple/few things and I can try to extrapolate it) |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
Of course, while ZNKR now has a standard bokuto, there's plenty of koryu with varying 'standard' bokuto (and others without a standard definition). |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
How are nidan waza and hiki waza not "real sword techniques"? The main problem that I can think of with nidan waza is that if a real sword connects on the first target, there's going to be some trouble getting it to the second target. The most common is kote-men, where as kendoka we typically rely on the kensen popping up off the kote to carry on into the men. With a real sword, you'd have to either miss (ie the kote is a feint, not an attack) or clear the sword from the kote by either yanking it or driving it through. All of those options are much different than a kendo kote-men, which as I've said is pretty shinai/bogu reliant. I'm not sure why hiki-waza wouldn't work. |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
I would be interested in anyone's thoughts that hiki-waza is not "real sword" technique. |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
How are nidan waza and hiki waza not "real sword techniques"? What about a real sword prohibits multiple strikes or cutting while stepping back? |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
I happen to be practicing Shinto-ryu these days which is the kenjutsu (sword to sword) set from Shindo Muso-ryu jodo and there are two kata that pop to mind which cut on a step back, both are an uke nagashi to beside uchidachi, then a step back to make distance and finish cut.
So there's hiki waza for you. Can't think of a hiki kiri in Niten Ichiryu offhand but there's a place or two where we step back to avoid getting hit, and sweep uchidachi's bokuto aside before attacking back in. Oops, yes of course, there are a bunch on the uchidachi side. On the length of the shinai tsuka, it's obviously because kendo is more accurate than the other kenjutsu schools since as we all know the samurai used tsuka which were very much longer than those on swords and bokuto today. OK OK not trying to start anything... actually the shinai tsuka is that length because of the big influence of jodo on kendo, and the grip on the jo is about the same as the grip on the shinai. No? How about the classical ratio of tsuka to overall length is 1:4. Does that work on your average shinai? Kim. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
First off, as a kendoka I'm talking out my ass when it comes to real sword techniques. This is idle speculation on teh interwebz here. |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
How would hiki waza work? In kendo the shinai are right in front of your face . . . |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
Hiki waza doesn't require taiatari or tsubazeriai, but, even so, there are koryu kenjutsu that have kata involving tsubazeriai. Tsukikage/tsubadome, zetsumyoken, and ganseki otoshi of Muso Jikiden Eishin Ryu spring to mind. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 5 (0 members and 5 guests) | |
|