Reply to Thread New Thread |
10-26-2005, 08:00 AM | #1 |
|
Shah Rukh is certainly not a versatile actor!!!! If he is a great actor , he should get at least one National Award. Well its not the think abt the National Award . He always has the same image in all his movies - the same oh cho cute ...cho chweet stuff!!!!!!!!!!
The same romantic stuff in all his movies. He also tends to overact !!!! I was laughing when I saw him do the emotional and shocking scene when the boy dies -in ASHOKA. His got attitude. thts all. The only outstanding movies I feel of his are Darr, Bazzigar, Anjaam, DDLJ , Devdas, thts it. He has overacted to the core in Ram Jaane, Duplicate, Baadshah, the list is long. He BUYS his Filmfare awards. For 2000 FilmFare awards, when Hritik Roshan got maximum awards.... Shah Rukh was given Critics award for PBDH OR SOME MOVIE EVEN WHEN SANJAY DUTT DESERVED IT 100% FOR HIS MINDBLOWING PERFORMANCES IN MISSION KASHMIR AND VAASTAV. ANIL KAPOOR FOR PUKAR. BUT ANIL WAS REWARDED THRU THE PROPER WAY WHEN HE GOT HIS NATIONAL AWARD FOR PUKAR. FOR ZEE AWARDS 2003 , WHEN HRITIK GOT BEST ACTOR KMG , SHAH RUKH GOT SPECIAL WARD FOR KAL HO NA HO . THE THING IS EVEN WHEN BEST ACTOR PRIZES ARE GIVEN TO OTHER ACTORS , SHAH RUKH WILL ALWAYS GET SOME CONSOLATION!!!!! WHAT THE HELL IS THIS!!!! Salman was GOOD in TERE NAAM FOR 2004 AGAIN SHAH RUKH IS GETTING AWARDS FOR MAIN HOON NAA , VEER ZARA , THE USUAL SAME STUFF. EVEN WHEN AMITABH Bachan GAVE EXPLOSIVE PERFORMANCES IN Khakee, Dev. Akshay Kumar was excellent in Mujse Shaadi Karoge and Aitraaz and even Khakee. Now I have understood one thing, even if any actor acts superbly in any movie , he will never get an award as long as Shah Rukh Khan has a release that year. Tch tch very bad. No wonder AAMIR KHAN DOES'NT BELIEVE IN AWARDS!!!!!! |
|
11-07-2005, 08:00 AM | #2 |
|
|
|
11-26-2005, 08:00 AM | #3 |
|
|
|
12-03-2005, 08:00 AM | #4 |
|
|
|
12-04-2005, 08:00 AM | #5 |
|
|
|
01-17-2006, 08:00 AM | #8 |
|
|
|
01-22-2006, 08:00 AM | #9 |
|
Lata Mangeshkar's favorite actor is Amir Khan ...Anyway, I liked Shah's acting in K3G and Chaahat...he was super... |
|
01-23-2006, 08:00 AM | #10 |
|
Originally Posted by Deep_Secrets Lata Mangeshkar's favorite actor is Amir Khan ...Anyway, I liked Shah's acting in K3G and Chaahat...he was super... How did Kamal come in here? I thought this was a thread on Shahrukh Khan? I didn't even read the posts before me :P |
|
02-11-2006, 08:00 AM | #11 |
|
|
|
02-20-2006, 08:00 AM | #12 |
|
Shahrukh was great in Kabhi haan Kabhi Naa. Very underrated performance, great music Jatin Lalit and ofcourse great direction by kundan shah. I also loved in Shah Rukh in Fauji/Circus TV days.
Post DDLJ (which was good) he was continuously slotted in soft romantic/Family dramas.They got worse KKHH KBKG KHNH MHN . Not a great actor like Aamir but a superstar with a great screen presence. |
|
02-23-2006, 08:00 AM | #13 |
|
|
|
03-11-2006, 08:00 AM | #14 |
|
|
|
03-29-2006, 08:00 AM | #16 |
|
sharukh is really a good actor. but he cant be called as a great actor untill he does anything different. look at akshay kumar. he is not the same khiladi boy now. just look at the roles he is doing now. anti-hero in ajnabi, warrior poet in athws, action hero in khakki, angry young man in insaan. he is really growing as an actor.
sharukh is an actor who doesnt look for variety. ajay devgan is another versatile actor who can do any kind of roles. sharukh will remain as the king khan of bollywood, but he cant be considered as a great actor. |
|
04-05-2006, 08:00 AM | #17 |
|
|
|
04-12-2006, 08:00 AM | #20 |
|
but for all his shortcomings, he's still an enormous success - and i believe he really does deserve the credit for that. even his worst critics will admit that the guy's got screen presence. you can like him, or you can hate him, but you definitely can't ignore him.
also, as i said, he fully understands his limitations as an actor - he understands that he's no aamir khan or naseeruddin shah - he realizes that there are certain roles he just can't do, so he doesn't even try. also, everything he does within the "mainstream" - roles like "Main Hoon Na", "Kal Ho Na Ho", and of course, old favourites like "Dilwale...", "Dil to Pagal Hai" etc. are instantly lapped up by audiences. on the other hand, the ones where he makes an honest attempt to be different, like "Dil Se..", "Asoka", "Josh" are summarily rejected. i guess this just reinforces his faith that he has a loyal audience who like him best when he sticks to his usual image. so he does. all in all, shah rukh khan can be called an INTELLIGENT actor - a SMART actor, definitely. a DIRECTOR'S actor, maybe - because even people like mani ratnam have said that it's a pleasure to direct him. a LIKEABLE actor, yes - for evergreen roles like "Kabhi Haan Kabhi Naa" but a GREAT actor ???? nope, don't think so. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|