Reply to Thread New Thread |
11-03-2011, 04:17 AM | #21 |
|
azhagiya kaNNE - Janaki. Title song kELunga, adhuvum nalla song.
I am not surprised that UthiripookkaL has not much takers. It's not a look-at-me kind of film that proclaims it's greatness, at times I think the film itself is not conscious about it's greatness. It's just that a film maker in his best frame of mind with the best available resources (including the short story) makes a film in the way he likes and it turns out to be one heck of a piece. I am one absoulte fan. |
|
11-03-2011, 04:20 AM | #22 |
|
|
|
11-03-2011, 04:23 AM | #23 |
|
Couple of good examples that worked for me too. Thank you. They did work in giving a matter of fact slice-of-life snapshot(s). And that's a good quality for sure. To create emotion out of moments, brought about by characters. A quality that I cherish about early Mahendran is the fact he didn't direct our (viewer's) attention to him or to his wit, but always the character's. Also, the unbridled quality of letting the character govern the plot & not the plot govern the characters. To sum his films into a plot line would be disservice. All that I get. But...
|
|
11-03-2011, 04:27 AM | #24 |
|
azhagiya kaNNE - Janaki. Title song kELunga, adhuvum nalla song.I am not surprised that UthiripookkaL has not much takers. It's not a look-at-me kind of film that proclaims it's greatness, at times I think the film itself is not conscious about it's greatness. It's just that a film maker in his best frame of mind with the best available resources (including the short story) makes a film in the way he likes and it turns out to be one heck of a piece. I am one absoulte fan. |
|
11-03-2011, 04:35 AM | #25 |
|
Why I mentioned the technique of a sad song with either a)cut between past and present to underline the character's misfortune and changed circumstances b) montage of the character's past to summarise/outline the current plight is think Sethu for a) - Vikram hale and healthy in the past, emaciated in the present, is underlined in Enge Sellum. For b), countless examples. Thenpaandi cheemaiyile? Mahendran doesn't need these props to invoke your tears. He simply shows the moment. And the rest your heart does it.
|
|
11-03-2011, 04:38 AM | #27 |
|
|
|
11-03-2011, 04:45 AM | #29 |
|
Title song: hey chinna poongatru thaalatta. Raja's voice plays with your heart like it was his violin string. And he hints the first interlude of Azhagiya Kanne in the first interlude here. That interlude captures the helplessness but small happiness of Ashwini's situation. Ofcourse, TM has its own musical motifs and BGM. But, Raja is a character here. He is there. You don't see hom but You knowhe is there. You don't pay attention to him but all the while he is occupying your mind as much as what you are watching on screen. Probably, it is Raja who tilts the scales for me. His craft is at a higher peak here. Yes, it is raw, it being only his third year in TF. But that suits Udhiri PookkaL in a way that the organised, tight-orchestrating latter day Raja cannot.
|
|
11-03-2011, 04:49 AM | #31 |
|
Very general statement. Quote with examples. |
|
11-03-2011, 04:50 AM | #32 |
|
|
|
11-03-2011, 05:00 AM | #33 |
|
This is what kamal for me as a writer/director. Whether it is comedy(MMKR etc.,), Action(kuruthipunal, aalavandhan) or drama(DM, Hey Ram, Virumaandi, Mahanadhi), kamal can excel it. Please think about any genre in cinema and related to kamal as creator, you won't feel uncomfortable in attaching that genre to Kamal and the same can't be said to anyone else IMHO.
|
|
11-03-2011, 05:00 AM | #34 |
|
|
|
11-03-2011, 05:04 AM | #35 |
|
This is what kamal for me as a writer/director. Whether it is comedy(MMKR etc.,), Action(kuruthipunal, aalavandhan) or drama(DM, Hey Ram, Virumaandi, Mahanadhi), kamal can excel it. Please think about any genre in cinema and related to kamal as creator, you won't feel uncomfortable in attaching that genre to Kamal and the same can't be said to anyone else IMHO. the movies mentioned. All are not from kamal himself. There was Crazy mohan and ofcourse another fantastic creator MR.Singeetham Srinivasa rao who joined hands with Kamal to give many good movies for us. You cant just give the credit to Kamal for all these.
on another note See singeetham explaining how Apoorva sagotharargal was made http://www.youtube.com/user/maatv#gr...892FA0005E680B |
|
11-03-2011, 05:07 AM | #36 |
|
Did UP work 'emotionally'? The visuals in particular. Any particular shot that took us to a heightened state as the character's. Like the close-up shot of Bhagavathar as he feels the cemented wall in Veedu. Which is one of my fav. unadulterated moments on film. Pure cinema. |
|
11-03-2011, 05:10 AM | #37 |
|
the movies mentioned. All are not from kamal himself. There was Crazy mohan and ofcourse another fantastic creator MR.Singeetham Srinivasa rao who joined hands with Kamal to give many good movies for us. You cant just give the credit to Kamal for all these. |
|
11-03-2011, 07:19 AM | #38 |
|
P_R
IMO mahendran had different way of story telling. He did not belong to any tamil movie school. He resembled more like Satyajit Ray and Adoor than Balachandar of Tamil. So probably we might have unconciously ignored his movies' greatnes. That is why I asked you to revisit udhiri pookkal. Only in hub some critics value content over entertainment part, which I have never seen anywhere else. So we should give right recognition for Mahendran, which I think he deserves it. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 8 (0 members and 8 guests) | |
|