Reply to Thread New Thread |
04-25-2006, 08:00 AM | #2 |
|
|
|
07-02-2006, 08:00 AM | #3 |
|
PR, adhaan. What I meant to say was unfunny sequemce-e kidaiyadhu.The thing with the supposedly mokkai climax is that there are no setpieces. Characters are reacting as they would in the situation. The humour lies in our box seat view. My problem, and possibly comfort for someone else, with the subsequent ones are the set pieces. It is still funny but not necessarily in-character. Like I said, it is possivle to buy funny but not natural but that will differ from person to person. But the humour in mmkr is undeniable, and the fact that it is natural is an achievement which I caanot even fathom after the pudding has been eaten. How the hell did they conceive that pudding?
|
|
07-27-2006, 08:00 AM | #4 |
|
|
|
05-05-2009, 04:19 AM | #5 |
|
Spin-off from High Expectations thread where Kamlhassan's comedies were being dissected. Or, in other words, NOV is going to write an essay on "Why Thenali is better than MMKR"
My purpose is to see a discussion on the merits of the post 90's comedies of Kamal. Indha visaranaila pala unmaigalai veli kondu varadhu HUB members poruppu. My humble suggestion is not to question any HUBBER's preference -even if you cannot fathom why a hubber made a particular choice, I'd be very happy if we can refrain from "ada paavi, andha padama" reactions. Ideally speaking, the advocates for each movie will articulate and advocate the specific merits of each movie. Obviously, with these movies being in different sub-genres, any equanimus-type symposium on analysis of the sub-genre and why the particular movie belongs to that sub-genre is welcome. Illainalaum, simple-a ungalukku en a particular comedy pidichudhunu discuss pannnunga. One more request, let's not discuss the demerits of particular movies here. adhukku thaniya thread pottukkalam |
|
05-05-2009, 04:27 AM | #6 |
|
Spin-off from High Expectations thread where Kamlhassan's comedies were being dissected. Or, in other words, NOV is going to write an essay on "Why Thenali is better than MMKR" MMKR - complete entertainer, movie runs fast starting from beginning. usually kamal films with many characters - dasa, virumandi, MMKR, kaathalaa kaathalaa ect are more interesting, but those with less characters, like VRMBBS, tenali are less interesting but, some common fans like these movies much more, i wonder why! |
|
05-05-2009, 04:35 AM | #8 |
|
|
|
05-05-2009, 04:40 AM | #9 |
|
|
|
05-05-2009, 04:40 AM | #10 |
|
Originally Posted by Plum My humble suggestion is not to question any HUBBER's preference -even if you cannot fathom why a hubber made a particular choice, I'd be very happy if we can refrain from "ada paavi, andha padama" reactions. |
|
05-05-2009, 04:42 AM | #11 |
|
Originally Posted by Plum Spin-off from High Expectations thread where Kamlhassan's comedies were being dissected. Or, in other words, NOV is going to write an essay on "Why Thenali is better than MMKR" MMKR - complete entertainer, movie runs fast starting from beginning. usually kamal films with many characters - dasa, virumandi, MMKR, kaathalaa kaathalaa ect are more interesting, but those with less characters, like VRMBBS, tenali are less interesting but, some common fans like these movies much more, i wonder why! No, no, no. Indha discussion venaame please. Adhu avanga pirappurimai. Objection over-ruled |
|
05-05-2009, 04:53 AM | #12 |
|
movie:Michael Madana Kama Rajan
genre: Michael Madana Kama Rajan This is an unique movie, absolutely original, a pleasant culmination of ideas bubbling forth from that busy head of Kamal, a triumph in execution of bringing on-screen the 1000 brilliant ideas that run through Kamal's mind simultaneously. It doesnt matter who deserves the credit. Singeetham or Crazy or Kamal. The perfection it touched in terms of bringing Kamal's multiple ideas to the fore without distracting the viewer or stopping-and-sermonising or stopping-and-pontificating-pointlessly is unmatched. I'd put it down as a contender for the all time best from Tamil filmdom. The closest Bollywood can cite is Jaane Bhi Do Yaaron, which is a much lesser achievement with much better underlying script material. Even the much derided climax has so many wonderful moments of fun - from VAM's "kizhinjudhu idhula telungu vera" to Kameswaran's "vegetarian illaiya" to "Boss, 12 maanga" to the "edhavadhu podunga boss", the movie never fails to extract humour out of every second of the screenplay. The humour could be word-play(I mean what I mean) to downright physical(kameswaran crawling along to the refrain "bheem bai bheem bai") to toilet(edhavadhu podunga boss) to absurdo-situational(12 maanga boss). The movie explores every possible strand of humour, and that is why it stands apart for me. The characterisation, and how each character traverses his character-arc seamlessly, and maintaining that even in the faricicial climax - look at the way each character descends down the rope, with Michael showing his machismo by jumping down. Look at each member of the cast reacting to each event, it takes multiple viewings to recognise VAM's "kizhinjidhu, telugu vera" reaction. It is almost real-life. Thats how we are, arent we? We REACT to situations around us. There are set-pieces, but in each of these, every character reacts. And that sets it apart really. Idhukku mela equanimus ezhudhuvaar. Soda theerndhu pochu. |
|
05-05-2009, 04:57 AM | #13 |
|
To add to that, nagesh delivers so many "punchy" humour lines but not a single line is out of character or stick out like it was put in there for comic effect. The lines are natural reactions of that character, and still serve as stand-alone jokes. That is the kind of genius we are talking about here. This is true of most characters, situations and dialogues. One exception I can think of is SN Lakshmi executing that flying dive etc, which was the only abaswaram for me in the movie but even that was only out of character, not unfunny. So, we are talking about a movie in which characters go through their life and react accordingly, while it also serves as a sequence of comic set-pieces, with very few exceptions. And even in the exceptions, they ARE FUNNY. So, we have sequences which are
1) FUNNY and NATURAL - 95% 2) FUNNY but not natural - hardly 5%. I personally feel that none of the subsequent movies could stand up on this aspect( and I am breaking my rule myself there, nevertheless, some things have to be told) |
|
05-05-2009, 04:58 AM | #14 |
|
|
|
05-05-2009, 05:03 AM | #15 |
|
|
|
05-05-2009, 05:05 AM | #16 |
|
|
|
05-05-2009, 05:07 AM | #17 |
|
|
|
05-05-2009, 05:13 AM | #19 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|