Reply to Thread New Thread |
10-29-2009, 03:05 AM | #21 |
|
Originally Posted by Appu s Originally Posted by Sourav Originally Posted by P_R பரத் ஒரு முருக பக்தர் என்பது நமக்கெல்லாம் தெரியும். bharath-e yaarunu paathi perukku therinjirukkathu... aarumugam avar padanthane oruthan ennathan nalla padam nadichalum (kadhal) Uruppadatha padam than ellarukkum nyabagam irukkum.. enna kodumai ithu Murugarukkum kadhalukkum enna conenction |
|
10-29-2009, 03:13 AM | #24 |
|
|
|
10-29-2009, 05:43 AM | #26 |
|
|
|
10-30-2009, 10:42 PM | #28 |
|
|
|
10-31-2009, 12:40 AM | #30 |
|
|
|
10-31-2009, 03:32 AM | #31 |
|
Fositive review from sify
http://sify.com/movies/tamil/review....tid=5&cid=2429 |
|
10-31-2009, 04:38 AM | #32 |
|
Fositive review from sify {quote="Sify"]1. However don’t expect it to be a carbon copy of the Imtiaz Ali original, as director R.Kannan has made it to suit the taste of the mass Tamil audiences. 2.However the Tamil remake lacks the magic of the original, and is a bit slow paced in the second half. [/quote] 1. veLangum 2.There was no frikkin magic in the original. Plus, i have watched AnandhaThaandavam. |
|
10-31-2009, 08:42 AM | #34 |
|
|
|
10-31-2009, 01:31 PM | #36 |
|
|
|
10-31-2009, 05:19 PM | #37 |
|
Originally Posted by VENKIRAJA 2.There was no frikkin magic in the original JWM is a good movie with exceptional dialogues......// enkitta solRa badhilA idhu? i yaam ek gao mein ek kissaan ragu thaathaa case! Please note that I'm not a blind supporter or TF when it comes to Tamil vs. Hindi or whatever. And I'm totally against remakes. |
|
10-31-2009, 05:32 PM | #38 |
|
|
|
10-31-2009, 06:07 PM | #39 |
|
Venki, |
|
10-31-2009, 06:08 PM | #40 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 12 (0 members and 12 guests) | |
|