Reply to Thread New Thread |
06-03-2009, 01:58 AM | #22 |
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 03:06 AM | #24 |
|
Originally Posted by groucho070 The kind of films that is being churned out mostly does not need versatile talents. The kind of films that need versatile talents are not using one that should be. There is a serious mismatch going on. Just because the film that requires a versatile talent, uses a severely undertalented actor, the said artiste somewhat acquires the "versatile" tag. I agree on some, disagree on some. Vadivelu is more versatile than all of them in the list (except kamalahaasan). *Naai sekar *Theeppori Thirumugam *Batista *Kaippulla Etc. |
|
06-03-2009, 03:16 AM | #25 |
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 03:24 AM | #27 |
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 03:26 AM | #28 |
|
Raiks, Naan sonnadhai neenga sariyaa purinjikkalai. I was being sarcastic there. A slight deviation from the point Groucho made. Vadivel paarunga oru dada role, karate master role, politician role ellAm nadichirukkaar, so he is certainly versatile, who cares if he gives the same expression, same brand of comedy in all those roles
|
|
06-03-2009, 03:29 AM | #31 |
|
Raiks, Naan sonnadhai neenga sariyaa purinjikkalai. I was being sarcastic there. A slight deviation from the point Groucho made. Vadivel paarunga oru dada role, karate master role, politician role ellAm nadichirukkaar, so he is certainly versatile, who cares if he gives the same expression, same brand of comedy in all those roles good point though. |
|
06-03-2009, 03:51 AM | #33 |
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 04:03 AM | #34 |
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 04:20 AM | #35 |
|
nalla vElai didnt ask for definition of actor.
http://in.answers.yahoo.com/question...1231946AAID8t3 see first answer |
|
06-03-2009, 04:25 AM | #36 |
|
|
|
06-03-2009, 04:25 AM | #37 |
|
But from that link, second answer:
Hrithik Roshan , because |
|
06-03-2009, 05:11 AM | #38 |
|
|
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|