LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 07-12-2010, 08:01 AM   #1
BeaseHoca

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
404
Senior Member
Default Did Sri Lankans understand the Dhamma better than the Buddha?
What do you think?



Metta,
Retro.
BeaseHoca is offline


Old 07-12-2010, 12:23 PM   #2
gIWnXYkw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
543
Senior Member
Default
Hi Retro,

What makes you think that?

gIWnXYkw is offline


Old 07-12-2010, 01:48 PM   #3
halyshitzob

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
340
Senior Member
Default
Hi Retro,

Did Buddhagosa and Bhikkhu Bodhi study in Sri Lanka?


Could you elaborate, please ?
halyshitzob is offline


Old 07-12-2010, 03:48 PM   #4
marketheal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
488
Senior Member
Default
I would like a little more to go on, please.
marketheal is offline


Old 07-12-2010, 03:59 PM   #5
12dargernswearf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
Generalised question, so appropriate answer, likewise: NO!
12dargernswearf is offline


Old 07-12-2010, 04:28 PM   #6
Qahtwugc

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
409
Senior Member
Default
Greetings,

Yes, it was quite a generalised question... perhaps I could rephrase it and make it even more general...

Has anyone understood the Dhamma better than the Buddha?

Metta,
Retro.
Qahtwugc is offline


Old 07-12-2010, 04:42 PM   #7
bonyrek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
Has anyone understood the Dhamma better than the Buddha?
Umm... surely not... how would that be possible, Retro ?

Forgive me if I'm "a bit thick" as we say in the north UK - but I'm still not at all clear about the purpose of your question ....
bonyrek is offline


Old 07-12-2010, 04:48 PM   #8
healty-back

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
447
Senior Member
Default
Has anyone understood the Dhamma better than the Buddha?
No one I know of. Albeit without being able to inhabit their skin, however, I would say that there are some who have penetrated the Dhamma deeply enough that I respect them as teachers. Ajahn Chah is one and some of his students. I particularly admire those who penetrate through to the heart of the matter and do not spend significant time or effort on irrelevancies, of which there are a great deal in what some see as Buddhism (e.g., amulets). Witness the simplicity of Ajahn Chah's practice!

The heart of the Path is so simple. No need for long explanations. Give up clinging to love and hate, just rest with things as they are. That is all I do in my own practice. Do not try to become anything. Do not make yourself into anything. Do not be a meditator. Do not become enlightened. When you sit, let it be. When you walk, let it be. Grasp at nothing. Resist nothing. There are dozens of meditation techniques to develop samadhi and many kinds of vipassana. But it all comes back to this - just let it all be. When I encounter a teacher like that, the question of whether he surpasses the Buddha in understanding the Dhamma never arises. He has what I want, bears none of the marks of a false teacher, and that is enough.

And will it not be a joy to those who come to us with little or no knowledge of the Dhamma, when we can point out such a simple expression of the Path. Such a thing can only give them heart, I think.
healty-back is offline


Old 07-12-2010, 06:42 PM   #9
fluoxet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
591
Senior Member
Default
Has anyone understood the Dhamma better than the Buddha?
Do you yourself think that there is anyone who has implied that they or someone else understands the Dhamma better than the Buddha, Retro ?


I suspect that a lot that's labelled 'Buddhism' today might possibly not be very close to what the historical Buddha actually taught.
fluoxet is offline


Old 07-12-2010, 07:10 PM   #10
CiccoineFed

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
I suspect that a lot that's labelled 'Buddhism' today might possibly not be very close to what the historical Buddha actually taught.
It is often said that pre-Buddhist religions in various nations were not abandoned in favour of Buddhism, but that Buddhism was incorporated into them at its advent, forming hybrid religions nonetheless referred to as "Buddhism". If this had not happened, perhaps Buddhism would long ago have died out or become a historical oddity known only to a handful of scholars. Buddhism seems to have become a world religion that is available to the general populace to this day by virtue of being adulterated. Go figure! If this is true, and I believe it is, then I guess it is in a sense ungrateful to rail against the process, though it is still incumbent upon us to penetrate "Buddhism" as deeply and trenchantly as possible in order to come as close as possible to the Dhamma purveyed by the Buddha himself.
CiccoineFed is offline


Old 07-12-2010, 08:17 PM   #11
zzbust

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
563
Senior Member
Default
.

It has come to be my private view that much of what is popularly called "Buddhism" today should be called something else completely - and I am, in fact, grateful that I've woken up to that fact at last .


However I'll refrain from going into further detail because its not my intention to offend anyone.

zzbust is offline


Old 07-12-2010, 08:56 PM   #12
sabbixsweraco

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
486
Senior Member
Default
It has come to be my private view that much of what is popularly called "Buddhism" today should be called something else completely - and I am, in fact, grateful that I've woken up to that fact at last .
Attempting to penetrate the Dhamma is the most rewarding pursuit I have discovered. So many pursuits, so many life paths, are presented to us as worthy of commitment, and I have found many rewarding, but in the end, none but the Dhamma has held the promise of complete cessation of suffering, and so none is as worthy of commitment.
sabbixsweraco is offline


Old 07-12-2010, 11:36 PM   #13
Phlkxkbh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
Greetings,

Yes, it was quite a generalised question... perhaps I could rephrase it and make it even more general...

Has anyone understood the Dhamma better than the Buddha?

Metta,
Retro.
Well, there is only so much Dhamma, isn't there? I think the Buddha would tell you that many, many understood the Dhamma as well as he did, and practiced the Dhamma to the end just as well as he did. What he is recorded to have said (see MN 108) is that the only difference between him and any other arahant, is that he was just the one who discovered the path, who originated the path, who proclaimed and made known the path, and they are followers in the path.
Phlkxkbh is offline


Old 07-13-2010, 01:22 AM   #14
Rx-Ultram

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
I think the Buddha would tell you that many, many understood the Dhamma as well as he did, and practiced the Dhamma to the end just as well as he did.
But not "better than".
Rx-Ultram is offline


Old 07-13-2010, 04:30 AM   #15
GohJHM9k

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
526
Senior Member
Default
Originally Posted by stuka I think the Buddha would tell you that many, many understood the Dhamma as well as he did, and practiced the Dhamma to the end just as well as he did.
But not "better than". Exactly. And they didn't need to add anything extraneous to it, either is perfect just as it is. ;-), as it
GohJHM9k is offline


Old 07-13-2010, 05:51 AM   #16
bypeTeenehalT

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
494
Senior Member
Default
Exactly. And they didn't need to add anything extraneous to it
bypeTeenehalT is offline


Old 07-13-2010, 07:02 AM   #17
sueplydup

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
Exactly. And they didn't need to add anything extraneous to it, either is perfect just as it is.
The whole thing just keeps getting clearer. I am happy.

sueplydup is offline


Old 07-13-2010, 11:08 AM   #18
Mboxmaja

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
510
Senior Member
Default
Mboxmaja is offline


Old 07-18-2010, 01:05 AM   #19
constanyiskancho

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
no
constanyiskancho is offline


Old 07-18-2010, 01:49 AM   #20
Biassasecumma

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
740
Senior Member
Default
IMHO, no one will "match" The Buddha in the understanding of the Dhamma - at least not until the future Buddha (Metteyya) revives the Dhamma at the appropriate time.
The Buddha did not teach the "Matreyya" superstition.

The Dhamma of the Buddha is already being revived, particularly in places like this forum. With the advent of mass communication via the internet, the Dhamma-ending age of superstition and blind traditionalism is now coming to a close.

The Buddha pointed out that other arahants "match" his knowledge of the Dhamma, he simply is the one who came up with it.
Biassasecumma is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 16 (0 members and 16 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:40 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity