LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-20-2012, 04:11 PM   #1
MineOffedOvex

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default The New Concorde Agreement
Interesting blog post on Sky News: Ferrari Poised For F1 Stake As CVC Plots $10bn Float | formula_one | ferrari | concorde_agreement | Kleinman | Sky News Blogs

Most interestingly:
A proposal for the introduction of Single Car Customer Teams which would allow new entrants to use cars deployed by other constructors during the previous season.
MineOffedOvex is offline


Old 03-20-2012, 06:26 PM   #2
AnriXuinriZ

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
They've been talking about customer teams for as long as I've been following F1. Never been in favour of it, it dilutes the premise of F1. But then it could be argued the likes of Torro Rosso - and before that Ligier, is already doing that.
AnriXuinriZ is offline


Old 03-20-2012, 06:30 PM   #3
Fsfkkkjz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
443
Senior Member
Default
I know that Ferrari and RBR are rumoured to have aditional benefits over the other teams but hope this is just poor reporting. I suspect that the other teams will have the same influence but haven't commented on it.

However, anythng can happen in F1 and usually does
Fsfkkkjz is offline


Old 03-20-2012, 08:18 PM   #4
royarnekara

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
541
Senior Member
Default
They've been talking about customer teams for as long as I've been following F1. Never been in favour of it, it dilutes the premise of F1. But then it could be argued the likes of Torro Rosso - and before that Ligier, is already doing that.
I'm all for component sharing like with have with gearbox.

I like what happened with Super Aguri where they developed the Arrows themselves. Certainly they/future teams shouldn't have/be relying in hand-me-down aero parts.
royarnekara is offline


Old 03-20-2012, 10:44 PM   #5
Adimonnna

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
436
Senior Member
Default
.... Never been in favour of it, it dilutes the premise of F1. ....
It does somewhat defeat the purpose of a constructors’ series doesn't it?
Adimonnna is offline


Old 03-20-2012, 11:30 PM   #6
jamisi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
It does somewhat defeat the purpose of a constructors’ series doesn't it?
Not if the WCC points go to the constructor as opposed to the team In fact there could be three world titles - driver, constructor and team.
jamisi is offline


Old 03-21-2012, 12:02 AM   #7
movlabz

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
407
Senior Member
Default
Not if the WCC points go to the constructor as opposed to the team In fact there could be three world titles - driver, constructor and team.
Fair enough, but if I, say, “purchase” a car from McLaren but decide to swap the engine for one from Renault and purchase wings from Red Bull (where else ), who would get the Constructors points?

Or am I misunderstanding "customer" car?
movlabz is offline


Old 03-21-2012, 12:11 AM   #8
VastDrura

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
406
Senior Member
Default
I know that Ferrari and RBR are rumoured to have aditional benefits over the other teams but hope this is just poor reporting. I suspect that the other teams will have the same influence but haven't commented on it.

However, anythng can happen in F1 and usually does
According to the link that Arrows posted it appears that Ferrari will (possibly) get even more than they were receiving because of their prominence.

According to the papers, parts of which I’ve seen a copy of, Ferrari would be eligible to apply for a share in F1’s holding company by virtue of its status as the team which has competed in the highest number of seasons since 1950. Although it’s unclear from the document whether this share would have anything other than a symbolic value, it is conceivable that as F1’s most important team, Ferrari would be handed an interest worth tens of millions of pounds in the event of a sale or stock market listing of
F1.

I understand that Ferrari and Red Bull have already agreed in principle to sign up to the new commercial framework (which is unsurprising since they get by far the best financial deal from it). This is the part of the deal I dont like.
VastDrura is offline


Old 03-21-2012, 12:37 AM   #9
DenisLevvin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
524
Senior Member
Default
10 billion USD?
They bought it for about 3 billion USD and want to cash in 10 billion? Maybe Greek Drachma.
DenisLevvin is offline


Old 03-21-2012, 01:51 AM   #10
Alex

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
As I understand it, because neither Ferrari and RBR are not currently members of FOTA they are free to negotiate their own commercial agreement with the FOM.

I don’t know where the $10B comes it. All I’ve read is that the CVC group has allegedly offered Ferrari and RBR shares of their operations, and may be looking at floating some of them on the market.

What this means to the distribution of the sporting revenues to the other teams, I don’t know. I can only assume that the remaining FOTA teams will have to negotiate separately with the FOM?

:cornfused:
Alex is offline


Old 03-21-2012, 08:11 AM   #11
CitsMoise17

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
Somehow I think I'd be more excited for a new Concorde.
CitsMoise17 is offline


Old 03-21-2012, 08:47 AM   #12
qwerty1

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
622
Senior Member
Default
10 billion USD?
qwerty1 is offline


Old 03-21-2012, 08:53 AM   #13
Uplillacype

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
492
Senior Member
Default
That's what the link said was the number they were talking about of F1's total Value
Uplillacype is offline


Old 03-21-2012, 09:07 PM   #14
scewDeasp

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
I can't open the link for some reason
I've read in other sources that the $10B is the estimated value of shares allegedly to be floated on the market.
scewDeasp is offline


Old 03-21-2012, 09:25 PM   #15
NodePark

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
500
Senior Member
Default
I can't open the link for some reason
The link still works for me.

And here's another: Formula One wheeling and dealing «

The other teams have a right to feel betrayed as Ferrari and Red Bull were members of the Formula One Teams’ Association and went through the motions of looking for a better way for the commercial side of the sport to be organised before swapping sides to feather their own nests. The collapse of any realistic collective bargaining means that the teams have once again been divided and will be conquered and will end up with a smaller share of the sport’s revenues than perhaps they should have had. Ecclestone is an unlikely boss for a quoted company as transparency has not always been his idea of how business should be done and while the stock exchange in Singapore might allow him a little more flexibility than London or New York, in terms of disclosure, the value would be less. At the moment there is a move to try to make F1 look as though it is worth $10 billion, but this seems like a lot of drum-banging.
NodePark is offline


Old 03-22-2012, 05:17 AM   #16
socialkiiii

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
566
Senior Member
Default
I can't open the link for some reason
I've read in other sources that the $10B is the estimated value of shares allegedly to be floated on the market.
Did they ask Goldman Sachs to estimate the value of the shares?!
socialkiiii is offline


Old 03-22-2012, 10:45 AM   #17
Nwxffgke

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
550
Senior Member
Default
The current majority owners just bought their shares with the consideration that Ferrari F1 was worth 3 billion a year ago.
Nwxffgke is offline


Old 03-22-2012, 04:00 PM   #18
HondasMenFox

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
334
Senior Member
Default
It seems (from Joe Saward's blog post) that the single car customer team idea is just there to put pressure on the lesser teams to sign up. We'll likely have a championship of only constructors after all.
HondasMenFox is offline


Old 03-23-2012, 02:03 AM   #19
JohnMitchel

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
The current majority owners just bought their shares with the consideration that Ferrari F1 was worth 3 billion a year ago.
Ferrari as a whole might be worth that much, not Ferrari F1 anyway.
JohnMitchel is offline


Old 03-23-2012, 02:43 AM   #20
Hixinfineedom

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
Fair enough, but if I, say, “purchase” a car from McLaren but decide to swap the engine for one from Renault and purchase wings from Red Bull (where else ), who would get the Constructors points?

Or am I misunderstanding "customer" car?
Well, it's long been a debate. The BRP team was most miffed in the mid-1960s (I forget exactly which year) when what it considered to be its own car was deemed not to be, seeing them lose out on various benefits constructors were given. It was one of the reasons that precipitated that team's withdrawal.
Hixinfineedom is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 05:06 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity