Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Interesting blog post on Sky News: Ferrari Poised For F1 Stake As CVC Plots $10bn Float | formula_one | ferrari | concorde_agreement | Kleinman | Sky News Blogs
Most interestingly: A proposal for the introduction of Single Car Customer Teams which would allow new entrants to use cars deployed by other constructors during the previous season. |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
They've been talking about customer teams for as long as I've been following F1. Never been in favour of it, it dilutes the premise of F1. But then it could be argued the likes of Torro Rosso - and before that Ligier, is already doing that. I like what happened with Super Aguri where they developed the Arrows themselves. Certainly they/future teams shouldn't have/be relying in hand-me-down aero parts. |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
Not if the WCC points go to the constructor as opposed to the team ![]() Or am I misunderstanding "customer" car? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
I know that Ferrari and RBR are rumoured to have aditional benefits over the other teams but hope this is just poor reporting. I suspect that the other teams will have the same influence but haven't commented on it. According to the papers, parts of which I’ve seen a copy of, Ferrari would be eligible to apply for a share in F1’s holding company by virtue of its status as the team which has competed in the highest number of seasons since 1950. Although it’s unclear from the document whether this share would have anything other than a symbolic value, it is conceivable that as F1’s most important team, Ferrari would be handed an interest worth tens of millions of pounds in the event of a sale or stock market listing of F1. I understand that Ferrari and Red Bull have already agreed in principle to sign up to the new commercial framework (which is unsurprising since they get by far the best financial deal from it). This is the part of the deal I dont like. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
As I understand it, because neither Ferrari and RBR are not currently members of FOTA they are free to negotiate their own commercial agreement with the FOM.
I don’t know where the $10B comes it. All I’ve read is that the CVC group has allegedly offered Ferrari and RBR shares of their operations, and may be looking at floating some of them on the market. What this means to the distribution of the sporting revenues to the other teams, I don’t know. I can only assume that the remaining FOTA teams will have to negotiate separately with the FOM? :cornfused: |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
I can't open the link for some reason ![]() And here's another: Formula One wheeling and dealing « The other teams have a right to feel betrayed as Ferrari and Red Bull were members of the Formula One Teams’ Association and went through the motions of looking for a better way for the commercial side of the sport to be organised before swapping sides to feather their own nests. The collapse of any realistic collective bargaining means that the teams have once again been divided and will be conquered and will end up with a smaller share of the sport’s revenues than perhaps they should have had. Ecclestone is an unlikely boss for a quoted company as transparency has not always been his idea of how business should be done and while the stock exchange in Singapore might allow him a little more flexibility than London or New York, in terms of disclosure, the value would be less. At the moment there is a move to try to make F1 look as though it is worth $10 billion, but this seems like a lot of drum-banging. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
Fair enough, but if I, say, “purchase” a car from McLaren but decide to swap the engine for one from Renault and purchase wings from Red Bull (where else |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|