Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
From the Autosport link posted by Alfa Fan, Bernie talks a good line that the problems are solely the fault of the two promotion groups in Texas. Somehow I feel he is not telling us everything, I would like to hear the other sides to the story.
On Oct 30 I posted this story from NJ quoting Texas sources saying that the $25 M of public funds was conditional on Texas hosting the sole US Grand Prix, further that "the subsidy was no longer legal under state law". N.J. hosting of Formula 1 race raises questions about Texas hosting with subsidies | NJ.com I cannot believe that the announcement of the NJ deal for 10 years, and the halting of construction in Texas are not connected in some way. |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
What I keep wondering is if the track even needs to be tied at the hip to hosting F1 initially? Would it be at all possible to build a track (perhaps even a shortened version to save $$), and go ahead and host everything else like the U.S. based series, concerts, events etc? Would it be possible to eventually turn a profit if the F1 sanctioning fees were lopped off the projected costs?
If so, then they could just make upgrades if they tried again in the future. At least we'd have something good come out of all this. |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
What I keep wondering is if the track even needs to be tied at the hip to hosting F1 initially? Would it be at all possible to build a track (perhaps even a shortened version to save $$), and go ahead and host everything else like the U.S. based series, concerts, events etc? Would it be possible to eventually turn a profit if the F1 sanctioning fees were lopped off the projected costs? |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
As I've read everything overthe past month or two, Tavo had the connections to get the F1 race contract via his personal friendship with BE, as well as the connections to get State funding. Tavo however was essentially not a financial stake holder in the TRACK. Epstein is the circuit owner and is, well from the sounds of it, a control freak and wanted sole control and ownership of the F1 race contract. From teh sound of it, he esentially wanted it for next to nothing. There was a story published a month or so ago about Hellemund asking the State events fund if transferring the race promotion would affect the $25M state funding.... Apparently the answer was not only YES, but the guaranteed funding went from 364 days before the event to not until AFTER the race, meaning not only would the promoters have to build the track, but pay formula one up front, out of their pocket. Tavo wanted to be paid for the race deals he landed, Epstein not only wouldn't pay what Tavo wanted, but F1 also would not give Epstein the same discounted sanctioning fees Tavo had recieved from Bernie. Bernie has an ace in the hole with the race he really wanted in the New York Metro Area. Tavo has just as many connections in Mexico as in Austin from what I've read, so he could just as easily talk Bernie into moving the race to Mexico where someone like Carlos Slim can pay for a new track out of his wallet change and get whatever government pemits he needs.
My concern quite honestly would be all the nastiness going on with the ongoing turf wars between the drug cartels. As much as I love Mexico and as many times as I've been down there, I'm going nowhere near most of Mexico anytime soon.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
What I keep wondering is if the track even needs to be tied at the hip to hosting F1 initially? Would it be at all possible to build a track (perhaps even a shortened version to save $$), and go ahead and host everything else like the U.S. based series, concerts, events etc? Would it be possible to eventually turn a profit if the F1 sanctioning fees were lopped off the projected costs? It's a shame the track won't be built anyway, but there's huge race politics with TMS in Texas. |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
And so much also for Tavo Hellmund making so much play of his excellent, long-standing relationship with Ecclestone, making him the person to bring a GP back to the United States. |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
Here is a link to Speedtv, which has a statement from Texas comptroller Susan Combs stating that no public funds will be paid in advance of a race. Also posted is her letter of May 2010 to Bernie appearing to say the opposite.
FORMULA ONE - F1: Combs Letter Promised Advance Payment For Austin Race Also there is the latest quotes from Bernie similar to the Autosport story. Seem like they have about 1 week to come to terms, or there is no contract, and no race. A complicated situation for sure. Gentlemen start your lawsuits! |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
If the promoters and the owners cannot be in agreement about holding this event, then it's never going to work. Chuck into the mix that funding from the State seems to be dubious and it gets worse.
I suggest Bernies ultimatum is designed to get all parties around the table and see if they can work together or whether this is a potential disaster in the making that is always going to fail. Personally, I agree with him 100%. If the parties involved cannot get this sorted, then it's best to can it now and cut the losses. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
This pretty much explains it all and I can't say I blame him.
“There's nothing to save. They can't bloody well pay," Ecclestone said. "What do you want me to do: Wait until next year? To put all our cars on it, run around the circuit and everything and come back with no money? The teams want paying. “It's not brinkmanship; it never has been with me. I've been trying to do a deal now with these people for 18 months or more. ... If they had the money, I'm sure there would be no problem.” Sexton: 2013 a possibility for Austin - Racer.com |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
See here, latest news is a statement from the track owners that they are willing to postphone the race till 2013. No mention of any resolution to the contract dispute.
FORMULA ONE - F1: First GP Could Move To 2013 Says Austin Track Official |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 3 (0 members and 3 guests) | |
|