LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-14-2010, 01:58 PM   #1
trilochana.nejman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
578
Senior Member
Default F1 2010 Side profiles
Hey everyone,

Thought I would put this together..

They are not to scale, so can't judge car lengths and heights.

Good for a design comparison.

trilochana.nejman is offline


Old 02-14-2010, 02:16 PM   #2
Talicoabilk

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
Well done.

The first thing that jumped out at me was the lack of sponsorship on the Renault and Sauber. It really stands out when you put the cars together like that.

The other thing was the position of the front wing. It could be the angle of the photos but the Renault, McLaren, Red Bull and Torro Rosso have their front wing inline with the nose where the other teams have the nose forward of the front wing, particularly the Sauber.

Oh, and one other thing. I hate the engine covers that connect with the rear wing. Makes for an ugly race car.
Talicoabilk is offline


Old 02-14-2010, 04:03 PM   #3
gabbaman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
467
Senior Member
Default
So 6 cars take on the airbox wing, 6 don't (lotus + USF1) It will be interesting to see if any teams add them on.
gabbaman is offline


Old 02-14-2010, 04:07 PM   #4
kranskregyan

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
What an amazing looking grid! The Virgin and the Mercedes really look classy.
kranskregyan is offline


Old 02-14-2010, 11:28 PM   #5
exeftWabreava

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
563
Senior Member
Default
Well done - great perspective.

Better get used to the fin because it is here to stay unless there is a significant change in the aero regs - and is scheduled to become part of endurance racing in 2011.

According to the designers it is there to negate lift, and ensure stability. The whole Mclaren approach is to ensure a quicker line through corners, especially slow ones [which MUST make Jenson happy because that is where he is so good at gaining time, similar to Alain Prost].

It reduces the "yaw" of the car and keeps it grounded. Ground effects from the top down - I suspect that if the cars are vry quick through the corners, the FIA could well ban it for 2011.

Mclaren have the best look I think and have the most beautiful car - and that is not because I support Jenson.
exeftWabreava is offline


Old 02-15-2010, 12:47 AM   #6
Escamsrasiush

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
Well done.


Oh, and one other thing. I hate the engine covers that connect with the rear wing. Makes for an ugly race car.
I totally agree. Makes for some huge advertising space though. Redbull should swap the bull logo and the script locations. the bull would fit better on the side pod and vice versa.
Escamsrasiush is offline


Old 02-15-2010, 01:02 AM   #7
GueseVekdet

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
480
Senior Member
Default
The pictures may not be in perspective but i'd guess they were all taken with the same level of zoom. On that basis the McLaren is the longest - it barely fits in the shot!

From what I've heard the Williams is the shortest, which would suggest a tall, thin fuel cell which could case C o G problems with heavy fuel loads but could pay dividends on low fuel quali runs or towards the end of the GP. Fascinating.
GueseVekdet is offline


Old 02-15-2010, 08:54 AM   #8
riverakathy

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
Well done - great perspective.

Better get used to the fin because it is here to stay unless there is a significant change in the aero regs - and is scheduled to become part of endurance racing in 2011.

According to the designers it is there to negate lift, and ensure stability. The whole Mclaren approach is to ensure a quicker line through corners, especially slow ones [which MUST make Jenson happy because that is where he is so good at gaining time, similar to Alain Prost].

It reduces the "yaw" of the car and keeps it grounded. Ground effects from the top down - I suspect that if the cars are vry quick through the corners, the FIA could well ban it for 2011.

Mclaren have the best look I think and have the most beautiful car - and that is not because I support Jenson.
Interesting, I was under the impression that the fins main job was to help clean the airflow to the rear wing during yaw so that it produces more downforce mid corner (though obviously by braking up airflow gowing laterally across the car it reduces lift as well).
riverakathy is offline


Old 02-15-2010, 09:10 AM   #9
exeftWabreava

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
563
Senior Member
Default
Interesting, I was under the impression that the fins main job was to help clean the airflow to the rear wing during yaw so that it produces more downforce mid corner (though obviously by braking up airflow gowing laterally across the car it reduces lift as well).
Well, the endurance cars are scheduled to use it because their intention is to prevent cars becoming airborne.

I am not the person to discuss aerodynamics with
exeftWabreava is offline


Old 02-15-2010, 01:32 PM   #10
legal-advicer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
615
Senior Member
Default
Great pic.
legal-advicer is offline


Old 02-16-2010, 07:08 AM   #11
trilochana.nejman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
578
Senior Member
Default
I'll add the other teams once they hit the track...or I find some good side profiles facing the same way
trilochana.nejman is offline


Old 02-16-2010, 08:22 AM   #12
rolex-buy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default
Are Williams going to bother with their flywheel KERS then or not?

I'm pretty sure they said they weren't but I'm not 100%.
rolex-buy is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 09:46 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity