Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
There was no advantage, unless you count the 2-3 tenths of aa second lead he had going into the pits. Commentators you were listening to are morons, you were no doubt watching BBC. Tell me how there is an advantage to being the one further down the track? You can't release into the track if the other car is even remotely close to yours. They had it completely wrong. The guy with the nearer pit area has the advantage. Anyway Ferrari did a crappy job, it took them 5 seconds when all teams do it under 4 seconds. |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
Not really his fault that dumber Buemi did change direction in the braking zone, the biggest no no in racing. So I am not sure why you think Heidfeld is at fault for it, bias maybe?! |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
Not really his fault that dumber Buemi did change direction in the braking zone, the biggest no no in racing. So I am not sure why you think Heidfeld is at fault for it, bias maybe?! Poor, poor form Ioan, really disappointed ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
do you always have to claim bias!! FFS! I like Heidfield, he's in my FGP, I also don't like Buemi, I think he's rubbish. But in that case I don't think it was all Buemis fault, you could see he was looking in the mirrors on the other side looking for Nick as he drifted across, it was mostly his fault, but Nick as the follower could have avoided better i think than proceeding into a shrinking gap. I'd say 90-10 (maybe 80-20) in fault against Buemi, but it was Nicks second accident in not many laps, one of which he'd already been penalised for. it was not good stuff from him. |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
well f-you, not mincing my words and dancing around your crap any more, if you can't see that i was agreeing that accident was more buemi's than heidfields, but that i still pick Heidfield for donkey cos he got involved in a couple of avoidable accidents in a quarter of the race then you must be as blind as you think i am biased. you are full of it. if you don't know what "it" is then ask around, i am sure someone can fill in the gap for you. It was a stupid accident and Buemi should arguably have got a penalty for it, but Heidfield was not entirely blameless IMO. |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
Are you for real man? Buemi knows damn well heidfeld is right on his ass. He looks in his mirror left-- no heidfeld. Gosh, where oh where could he be? It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out where he was. Even worse, heidfeld was halfway off ithe track already because he was responding to buemi's druken driving, Beumi was completely off the ideal racing line so there is no way he was just trying to take the corner. |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
|
Buemi - for the dumb move on Heidfeld
Vettel - another example of his lack of killer instinct racecraft and leaving it down to the guys in pitlane to help him out. do you always have to claim bias!! FFS! I like Heidfield, he's in my FGP, I also don't like Buemi, I think he's rubbish. But in that case I don't think it was all Buemis fault, you could see he was looking in the mirrors on the other side looking for Nick as he drifted across, it was mostly his fault, but Nick as the follower could have avoided better i think than proceeding into a shrinking gap. I'd say 90-10 (maybe 80-20) in fault against Buemi, but it was Nicks second accident in not many laps, one of which he'd already been penalised for. it was not good stuff from him. It was not mis-timed banzai move. NH legitmately makes a move before Buemi decided to cut across. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|