Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Martin Whitmarsh is suggesting that Red bull and maybe others (Ferrari?) are using some form of ride height control system
Interview here.. http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/moto...ne/8590493.stm While Red Bull deny having any such system.. http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKLDE62Q01P20100327 Makes sense, could explain why Mclaren were able to get near the race pace of the front runners but were way off the pace in qualifying a fortnight ago.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
Martin Whitmarsh is suggesting that Red bull and maybe others (Ferrari?) are using some form of ride height control system time will tell |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Martin Whitmarsh is suggesting that Red bull and maybe others (Ferrari?) are using some form of ride height control system This is an alternative to "They thought of something we didn't so they must be cheating." This is a typical response from any team. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
As long as the ride height is only changed when the car is stopped it is a legal approach. However I was under the impression that the cars in parc ferme could not be touched aside from front wing angles and tyre pressures. Therefore if red bull alter the RH between end of quali and the start of the GP perhaps there is cause for investigation. |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
Makes sense, could explain why Mclaren were able to get near the race pace of the front runners but were way off the pace in qualifying a fortnight ago.. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Martin Whitmarsh should know what the difference between push rod and pull rod suspension is so is he just throwing mud at red bull
redbull use pullrod http://www.f1technical.net/articles/39 The advantages of a pull rod lie in the possibility to make the nose lower |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
Whitmarsh was careful on the BBC coverage to praise Red Bull for their innovation - possibly mindful that their own duct system wasn't banned.
Tricks like these should be looked at carefully, but obviously if the FIA are happy with their legality then there's no problem. Remember: there is no "spirit" to the rules! ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
FIA announce they will deem any ride height adjustment device used in parc ferme to be against the rules:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82763 Red Bull still maintain they don't have such a thing: http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82741 Which leaves us to wonder how their car was grounding out so noticeably in low fuel qualifying in Oz. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
I think Red Bull are telling porkies. Not cheating.
I do so because they have a "boff" named Adrian Newey who is the beginning and the end when it comes to ride heights and racing cars dating back to the marvellous Leyton House chassis. Still one of my disappointments in racing - watching Ivan Capelli lose the lead of the 1990 French Grand Prix at Paul Ricard with five laps to go. If the FIA do make discovery then it would be similar to what happened to Renault in 2006 with their damper system. [2005?] Although that was overt. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
I could easily imagine a system where a both race & a qualifying setting could be designed into the suspension. Pressurised gas or air could set it to the qualifying setting, and then it could be set to either slowly leak out overnight, or be manually released while the car is being prepped on the grid.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
Which would mean that when the car tries to go to the grid for the race, it would sit with it's belly down and lose most of it skid tray not to mention drive and braking.
The only way to make this work is to change height during the race. Red Bull claim they are not doing this so unless the FIA prove different, then that's the end of it. Pure speculation otherwise. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
I can't imagine Red Bull would deliberately allow their cars to bottom out during a race, as a rule has been in place for many years where the board/skid tray is checked for excessive wear in parc ferme. The FIA have been strict on this since Imola 1994 (rule came in 1993), and if Red Bull are messing around with ride heights then it is dangerous ground. There is a clear rule and I can't imagine a chap of Newey's experience would make such a misjudgement.
I did notice the Red Bull bottoming out in Melbourne where others were not, but as has been said its pure speculation. If there is a system on the car, then Red Bull would be stupid to assume the FIA won't find it. Then again is this other teams trying to spook the opposition and cause unnecessary aggro? Juicy.. ![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|