LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 03-27-2010, 11:39 PM   #1
ëàìèíàò

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
427
Senior Member
Default Red bull, ride height control reason for qualy pace?
Martin Whitmarsh is suggesting that Red bull and maybe others (Ferrari?) are using some form of ride height control system

Interview here..

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/moto...ne/8590493.stm


While Red Bull deny having any such system.. http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKLDE62Q01P20100327

Makes sense, could explain why Mclaren were able to get near the race pace of the front runners but were way off the pace in qualifying a fortnight ago..
ëàìèíàò is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 01:03 AM   #2
QxmFwtlam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
I did read about this elsewhere; I'll look for the link as it explained it far better than I ever could.
QxmFwtlam is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 01:09 AM   #3
Cucoulkrory

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
557
Senior Member
Default
Martin Whitmarsh is suggesting that Red bull and maybe others (Ferrari?) are using some form of ride height control system

Interview here..

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/moto...ne/8590493.stm


While Red Bull deny having any such system.. http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKLDE62Q01P20100327

Makes sense, could explain why Mclaren were able to get near the race pace of the front runners but were way off the pace in qualifying a fortnight ago..
might be something to it.

time will tell
Cucoulkrory is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 01:20 AM   #4
standaman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
870
Senior Member
Default
As long as the ride height is only changed when the car is stopped it is a legal approach.
standaman is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 04:09 AM   #5
tipoketpu

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
435
Senior Member
Default
Martin Whitmarsh is suggesting that Red bull and maybe others (Ferrari?) are using some form of ride height control system

Interview here..

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/moto...ne/8590493.stm


While Red Bull deny having any such system.. http://uk.reuters.com/article/idUKLDE62Q01P20100327

Makes sense, could explain why Mclaren were able to get near the race pace of the front runners but were way off the pace in qualifying a fortnight ago..
This can be read as "They are faster than us so they must be cheating."

This is an alternative to "They thought of something we didn't so they must be cheating."

This is a typical response from any team.
tipoketpu is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 04:22 AM   #6
ebonytipchik

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
450
Senior Member
Default
Must admit that the Red Bull's do seem to be able to run a lot lower in qualifying.

Interesting bit at the end of the reuters piece that Horner (and so Red Bull) are happy with the legality of teh McLaren rear wing

WT
ebonytipchik is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 05:13 AM   #7
QxmFwtlam

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
527
Senior Member
Default
As long as the ride height is only changed when the car is stopped it is a legal approach.
Yes. Ferrari have a system, do they not, whereby they alter ride height mechanically in the pit stops.

However I was under the impression that the cars in parc ferme could not be touched aside from front wing angles and tyre pressures. Therefore if red bull alter the RH between end of quali and the start of the GP perhaps there is cause for investigation.
QxmFwtlam is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 07:10 AM   #8
gariharlj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
Read some speculation somewhere that they could be taking advantage of the fact that you're allowed to re-gas the shocks in parc ferme. Complete speculation though.
gariharlj is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 07:51 AM   #9
hrthwhr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
368
Senior Member
Default
Makes sense, could explain why Mclaren were able to get near the race pace of the front runners but were way off the pace in qualifying a fortnight ago..
That or maybe merc engines don't need as much fuel? So while other cars are quicker, they need more fuel and are thus heavier which hampers them slightly in the race?
hrthwhr is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 10:30 AM   #10
gundos

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
Martin Whitmarsh should know what the difference between push rod and pull rod suspension is so is he just throwing mud at red bull

redbull use pullrod

http://www.f1technical.net/articles/39

The advantages of a pull rod lie in the possibility to make the nose lower
gundos is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 04:41 PM   #11
dexterljohnthefinanceguy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
626
Senior Member
Default
What does it matter when these cars can't finish a race. It's like Williams in 2002, great in qualy, but only in qualy...
dexterljohnthefinanceguy is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 04:57 PM   #12
RuttyUttepe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
430
Senior Member
Default
Whitmarsh was careful on the BBC coverage to praise Red Bull for their innovation - possibly mindful that their own duct system wasn't banned.

Tricks like these should be looked at carefully, but obviously if the FIA are happy with their legality then there's no problem.

Remember: there is no "spirit" to the rules!
RuttyUttepe is offline


Old 03-28-2010, 05:02 PM   #13
dexterljohnthefinanceguy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
626
Senior Member
Default
Of course, but there is letter and it is important.
dexterljohnthefinanceguy is offline


Old 04-08-2010, 12:55 AM   #14
gariharlj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
FIA announce they will deem any ride height adjustment device used in parc ferme to be against the rules:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82763
Red Bull still maintain they don't have such a thing:
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/82741
Which leaves us to wonder how their car was grounding out so noticeably in low fuel qualifying in Oz.
gariharlj is offline


Old 04-08-2010, 08:27 AM   #15
Seerseraxlils

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
562
Senior Member
Default
I think Red Bull are telling porkies. Not cheating.

I do so because they have a "boff" named Adrian Newey who is the beginning and the end when it comes to ride heights and racing cars dating back to the marvellous Leyton House chassis.

Still one of my disappointments in racing - watching Ivan Capelli lose the lead of the 1990 French Grand Prix at Paul Ricard with five laps to go.

If the FIA do make discovery then it would be similar to what happened to Renault in 2006 with their damper system. [2005?] Although that was overt.
Seerseraxlils is offline


Old 04-08-2010, 09:33 AM   #16
cmruloah

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
490
Senior Member
Default
I could easily imagine a system where a both race & a qualifying setting could be designed into the suspension. Pressurised gas or air could set it to the qualifying setting, and then it could be set to either slowly leak out overnight, or be manually released while the car is being prepped on the grid.
cmruloah is offline


Old 04-08-2010, 03:39 PM   #17
Anteneprorid

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
489
Senior Member
Default
Which would mean that when the car tries to go to the grid for the race, it would sit with it's belly down and lose most of it skid tray not to mention drive and braking.

The only way to make this work is to change height during the race. Red Bull claim they are not doing this so unless the FIA prove different, then that's the end of it. Pure speculation otherwise.
Anteneprorid is offline


Old 04-08-2010, 03:56 PM   #18
MegaJIT

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
591
Senior Member
Default
It couldn't be changed in Parc Ferme, but presumably could when the car is on the grid?

But.. what about a fully automatic system? One which if the car is light it will drop it down but if it is heavy will provide a bit more resistance. That wouldn't have to be altered by anyone.
MegaJIT is offline


Old 04-08-2010, 04:06 PM   #19
Innockcroff

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
I can't imagine Red Bull would deliberately allow their cars to bottom out during a race, as a rule has been in place for many years where the board/skid tray is checked for excessive wear in parc ferme. The FIA have been strict on this since Imola 1994 (rule came in 1993), and if Red Bull are messing around with ride heights then it is dangerous ground. There is a clear rule and I can't imagine a chap of Newey's experience would make such a misjudgement.

I did notice the Red Bull bottoming out in Melbourne where others were not, but as has been said its pure speculation. If there is a system on the car, then Red Bull would be stupid to assume the FIA won't find it. Then again is this other teams trying to spook the opposition and cause unnecessary aggro? Juicy..
Innockcroff is offline


Old 04-08-2010, 04:29 PM   #20
Sydaycymn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
330
Senior Member
Default
I hear the Red Bull system is operated by a bladder pressed by the driver's knee during qualifying to release gas from the damper and alter the height...wait...I might be mixing two things up.
Sydaycymn is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:45 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity