LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 02-06-2009, 04:08 AM   #21
bawayTeen

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
Have a heart for those of us that like both sports, I had to put up with the Imola incident and last nights balls up.

I went f***king mental when they went to an ad and then returned for us to see the Everton players celebrating a goal. ITV are an embarassment of a TV station and should be put down as soon as possible because they do absolutely nothing of any value. 120 minutes of football and they manage to miss the most important part
Chill Bro
At least you didn't soil yourself!
Or did you?
bawayTeen is offline


Old 02-06-2009, 06:03 AM   #22
KuRoregioNka

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
526
Senior Member
Default
This will roll on for ages, it really is a massive screw up by ITV.

The F.A Cup coverage on the whole has been poor, they seem to just trudge through it, whereas you cant have any complaints about their Champions League coverage. You'd think they'd be able to manage one if they can do the other.

But as far as the incident the other night goes, the F.A will probably not be offering ITV the rights for next season. You cant beat BBC for F.A Cup coverage.
KuRoregioNka is offline


Old 02-06-2009, 06:11 AM   #23
BartRonalds

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
420
Senior Member
Default
This will roll on for ages, it really is a massive screw up by ITV.

The F.A Cup coverage on the whole has been poor, they seem to just trudge through it, whereas you cant have any complaints about their Champions League coverage. You'd think they'd be able to manage one if they can do the other.

But as far as the incident the other night goes, the F.A will probably not be offering ITV the rights for next season. You cant beat BBC for F.A Cup coverage.
yeah,

would it be kayos if it happen to hamilton last lap in brazil last year, or with the champions league final with man utd 2 goals in the 2 mins in barcalona 10 years back
BartRonalds is offline


Old 02-06-2009, 04:51 PM   #24
EnvellFen

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
507
Senior Member
Default
But as far as the incident the other night goes, the F.A will probably not be offering ITV the rights for next season. You cant beat BBC for F.A Cup coverage.
Sadly, I think the FA will still give ITV and Setanta the rights out of spite against the BBC. This is why they gave them to ITV in the first place - because the BBC pundits heavily critized the England national team for bad performances, which were well worth criticizing! The FA are even more of a joke than ITV - they know that ITV will say "England are great" even when they are awful.
EnvellFen is offline


Old 02-06-2009, 06:10 PM   #25
Broorbbub

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
610
Senior Member
Default
Apparently, last night (now), ITV managed to go to an ad break just in time to miss the only goal of an FA Cup game.

After all the times ITV managed to pick the worst possible moment to stick an ad break in F1 races, I feel a certain sense of schadenfraude coming on...
When I was in Hong Kong, TVB Pearl managed to miss a goal during the Soccer World Cup by going to an ad. Soccer, unfortunately, is not a game where advertisement breaks are possible unless you have a delayed telecast.
Broorbbub is offline


Old 02-06-2009, 07:45 PM   #26
CealialactBek

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
525
Senior Member
Default
When I was in Hong Kong, TVB Pearl managed to miss a goal during the Soccer World Cup by going to an ad. Soccer, unfortunately, is not a game where advertisement breaks are possible unless you have a delayed telecast.
They usually only have adverts at half-time. I believe during normal play is actually illegal in the UK.
CealialactBek is offline


Old 02-06-2009, 09:26 PM   #27
gusecrync

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
530
Senior Member
Default
Sadly, I think the FA will still give ITV and Setanta the rights out of spite against the BBC. This is why they gave them to ITV in the first place - because the BBC pundits heavily critized the England national team for bad performances, which were well worth criticizing! The FA are even more of a joke than ITV - they know that ITV will say "England are great" even when they are awful.
If you look up "conflict of interests" in a dictionary, is there a picture of Brian Barwick?
gusecrync is offline


Old 02-07-2009, 01:27 AM   #28
quorceopporce

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
597
Senior Member
Default
If you look up "conflict of interests" in a dictionary, is there a picture of Brian Barwick?
There could also be pictures of many sports pundits, for that matter...
quorceopporce is offline


Old 02-08-2009, 06:45 AM   #29
77chawzence

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
546
Senior Member
Default
There was another situation like that in the U.S. last April. Fox was showing a baseball game in the afternoon and a NASCAR race at night. When the baseball game was delayed by rain it overlapped with the race. Fox cut away from the game with one out remaining to show the race which had already started. Baseball fans were outraged because they missed the end of the game. Race fans were outraged because they missed the start of the race.
77chawzence is offline


Old 02-08-2009, 06:09 PM   #30
awagsFare

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
567
Senior Member
Default
way back when I used to live in Austria, the best part of watching F1 and Tv for that matter was that advertising was minimized to pre and post events in small 5 minute blocks or non at all.. This might have to do with tje stations being state owned rather than private, but it was a joy too watch.

Later as I moved around and got to see other coverage, I increasingly grew tired of the "meddling" tv ads in broadcast coverage. Sports like soccer and F1 are the least sutiable ofr in game interruptions.

Speed TV is by far the worst in terms of incesnt TV interruptions in F1 coverage. I wan;t even discuss Fox tv or CBS when they carried it becuase that to me wetre more novelties than real broadcasts. Sometimes their ads run for 6-7 minutes with mini infomercials on.

I wonder why Speed cannot figure out to use a Soccer style advertising scheme with in stream ad logos and mentions , or perhaps a bottom area banner style or side by side view( ala gol TV). We live in modern times they can figure it out. I do not need to watch a 5 minute ad for a weed whacker at 7am.
awagsFare is offline


Old 02-08-2009, 06:11 PM   #31
awagsFare

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
567
Senior Member
Default
There was another situation like that in the U.S. last April. Fox was showing a baseball game in the afternoon and a NASCAR race at night. When the baseball game was delayed by rain it overlapped with the race. Fox cut away from the game with one out remaining to show the race which had already started. Baseball fans were outraged because they missed the end of the game. Race fans were outraged because they missed the start of the race.
The rule of thumb was to stay with the game to the conclusion.

Especially NASCAR, where the show goes on for 4 hours and the start of the race is more processional than anything else. No matter how good the technology is, etc. one can always count on the stupidity of programming directors everywhere.
awagsFare is offline


Old 02-10-2009, 07:59 PM   #32
Pasy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
Have a heart for those of us that like both sports, I had to put up with the Imola incident and last nights balls up.

I went f***king mental when they went to an ad and then returned for us to see the Everton players celebrating a goal. ITV are an embarassment of a TV station and should be put down as soon as possible because they do absolutely nothing of any value. 120 minutes of football and they manage to miss the most important part
I can understand your frustration, i felt exactly the same way. Quite frankly, why the BBC decided not to keep their coverage of cup matches and England matches, i have no idea. ITv always seems to mess it up somehow, and it just isn't the same as Motty, Lineker, Hansen and co in pre and post match analysis.

At least we can thank god that the BBC took F1 back......
Pasy is offline


Old 02-11-2009, 02:19 PM   #33
77chawzence

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
546
Senior Member
Default
way back when I used to live in Austria, the best part of watching F1 and Tv for that matter was that advertising was minimized to pre and post events in small 5 minute blocks or non at all.. This might have to do with tje stations being state owned rather than private, but it was a joy too watch.

Later as I moved around and got to see other coverage, I increasingly grew tired of the "meddling" tv ads in broadcast coverage. Sports like soccer and F1 are the least sutiable ofr in game interruptions.

Speed TV is by far the worst in terms of incesnt TV interruptions in F1 coverage. I wan;t even discuss Fox tv or CBS when they carried it becuase that to me wetre more novelties than real broadcasts. Sometimes their ads run for 6-7 minutes with mini infomercials on.

I wonder why Speed cannot figure out to use a Soccer style advertising scheme with in stream ad logos and mentions , or perhaps a bottom area banner style or side by side view( ala gol TV). We live in modern times they can figure it out. I do not need to watch a 5 minute ad for a weed whacker at 7am.
I think a lot of it involves the reliance on network affiliates in North American broadcasting. An affiliate requires that they get a certain amount of advertising time for every certain amount of real time. And the same still applies to cable and satellite tv. SPEED still has to reach deals with the cable and satellite companies carrying it about how much advertising time they can sell in a broadcast.
77chawzence is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:31 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity