Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
When you can get a dog on the podium mainly through strategy, that shows why Brawn gets the big bucks. I knew he was good, but I have a new respect for this guy's talents. But yes, Brawn deserves a lot of credit and certainly is worth the investment Honda made in him. I too have new found respect for him and it seams obvious that the group of guys around M.Schumacher at the time were all part of his success. What Ferrari are demonstrating now is what many feared would happen with their "Italians first" mentality in key positions, rather than employing the best people regardless of nationality. It is quite unimaginable to think that Jean Todt would have made the same bonehead decisions that ferrari did today. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
Considering the car isn't even quick enough to get into Q2 (as the last two weekends have shown), then Honda has really taken the maximum with strategies. 14 points is quite a good sum considering the pace of the machinery, but it'll be hard to get higher than P8 in the WCC if the car is not quick enough to score points on merit. But it'll be interesting to see, how many points will Honda collect in 2009 if the car is more capable (of course, if it is at all).
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
I won't quite call Barrichello a dog, but his best days are behind him...but he was light years better than button today in the same exact car, against a driver who is usually pretty good in the wets.or maybe yo meant the car which is still awful. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Honestly, I dont know, the only one that comes to mind is Hungry '98, and that was a combination of Schumy driving the nuts of the Ferrari and Brawn coming up with a very aggressive strategy. We've got to remember that Luca Baldaserie (sp?) has been calling the shots on strategy for at least the last 5 years and was Brawns second before that.
Got to say, I'm shocked that Honda were the only team to go for the full wets today consider the huge amount of time they made up over the rest of the field (I reckon Rubens made about 1:00 over every one else but Hamilton). |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
It's quite easy on TV to shout out "FULL WETS NOW!!" but certainly wouldn't want to be the person on pitwall to roll the dice.
That was a tough one to call because it that brief shower happened right at the final pit window. The teams had a good idea it was a passing shower but you don't have an idea how the track will dry out and necessitate an extra stop for inters/slicks. Full wets are designed to clear water so they won't be too good in damp conditions because you can overheat them. Rubens was able to consolidate his podium because nobody gambled and virtually a no-brainer. |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
I won't quite call Barrichello a dog, but his best days are behind him...but he was light years better than button today in the same exact car, against a driver who is usually pretty good in the wets.or maybe yo meant the car which is still awful. Even Todt by himself would have made better decisions than what we saw yesterday. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Why did he leave?
Was it a personal choice to get out of Ferrari? Some questions should be asked inside Ferrari as to why key personel in their management feel 'life outside of Ferrari' is better than in it. Or was it a Ferrari decision to replace him? Even bigger questions about their decision if that was the case. |
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
When his departure from Ferrari was announced the statement said: "After years of hard and demanding work, Ross Brawn has decided to turn his attention to his personal life..." Ross had proved everything with ferrari and perhaps he wanted a fresh challenge? |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
I agree that if brawn were still there, they would not be the laughing stock they currently are. ![]() |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|