Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
Suppose you were given the following regulations for 2009:
1. You can buy any chassis from the 2006 - 2008 seasons (but build it yourself!) for one year only (next year's model you must design yourself) 2. You are allowed to buy any engine/gearbox you choose from the same period. I would choose to build on either the Ferrari 248 or F2007, but I would also try to acquire the Mercedes FO108-series engines, or even seek out the Cosworth CS2006 (the Cosworth is my prefered option because it produces 830hop but is unreliable) & I believe that the Cosworth could have developed the CS2006 to become more reliable had it not been for the 'engine-freeze' by FOM/FIA! Team Name: Tabbara Racing with Cosworth engines. Tabbara-Cosworth As the year of entry is 2010, the car would be called BT210 |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
I would not take part in 2009 and I would use the money to built a test mule for my full time entry in 2010
if I had to buy a car I would buy a fully developed 2008 car from one of the top teams and equip it with the engine it was designed to house otherwise using Ferrari chassis with Mercedes engines or whatever will result in a frankenstein monster that will not work on track |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
The technical regulations next year are so different that I don't think it can be possible to use a chassis from previous years. But I guess this aspect wasn't the key of the thread. If the new tech. regulations won't be a problem, then the best choice is to use the best chassis of the latest season - F2008!
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
Nah, I'd go for the 248 or F2007 & simply build on it with a new engine. Thing is, the CA2006 engine of Cosworth had the power (about 40hp more than the Ferrari 056 or RS26) but simply lacked the reliability. On the other hand, Nico Rosberg with is CA2006 equipped Williams-Cosworth FW28 managed to clock one FL in Bahrain in 2006 & the pace was impressive, but Williams was forced to retire from most races. Had the 'one engine for two races' rule not been applied then I think Williams-Cosworth would have been a Top 4 contender.
Adapting a chassis to a new engine isn't as simple as 'install & drive' but it's not as difficult as some make it sound. Remember, Williams adapted to the Toyota RVX07 engine in the FW29. Had FIA not introduced the 'engine freeze' then the CA2006 would have been developed with reliability in mind & would have given Williams the power-advantage that they needed to challenge for positions & sufficient reliability. The Toyota RVX08 was chosen on the grounds of availability & reliability but it's probably the strongest component of the Toyota F1 team anyway. |
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#19 |
|
Suppose you were given the following regulations for 2009: From Airlie Beach I would sail the Great Barrier Reef, from Cannes, I would cruise the Mediterranean, and watch the Monaco F1 race from my yacht, and from my ski lodge I would ski the Trois Valles. Oh Yes!! I would keep my Volvo Cross Country so I can transport the chilled Maison Chandon to my yacht. Can't think why anyone would want to buy into an F1 team if they could have all that. |
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
SI believe that the Cosworth could have developed the CS2006 to become more reliable had it not been for the 'engine-freeze' by FOM/FIA! 2) Whilst in engine freeze mode, manufacturers are still able to change parts within the engine if they can demonstrate that the changes are to increase reliability and eliminate faults. Which they have done and will do. |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|