Reply to Thread New Thread |
|
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
I would want to agree with Mike D but in all fairness in order to equal things a bit and ease it for some drivers (...) i'd have the championship leader cleaning the road on day one, following the championship standings then reverse order 10->1 after day 1 results, on day 2-3...
If the championship leader loses his position in the standings because of cleaning on day one then he could regain it in the next rally, sort of cycling/shaking the standings. Not a perfect system but haven't found a better one giving at the same time some (artificial) chance to the newcomers/slower/customer drivers on day one and put the front runners in a straight fight for the win. By the way, gloomyday, what's your take on it ? |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
Using equipments similar to these ones, no reverse starting order is needed.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EsPLrQsAugQ |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
Using equipments similar to these ones, no reverse starting order is needed. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9qoVj-7fh0Y or http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzNzVCQdF6E |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
should be reversed from day one.
"If the championship leader loses his position in the standings because of cleaning on day one then he could regain it in the next rally, sort of cycling/shaking the standings." i disagree. Perhaps the remaining rallies don't require sweeping? Then what? No driver should be punished for leading the championship or the rally. and random position? is that a joke or what? It hardly makes the conditions more equal/fair. I deffo agree with Citroen team boss. |
![]() |
![]() |
#12 |
|
http://www.autosport.com/news/report.php/id/90898 |
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
I agree 110% with NOT. The idea of a lottery is moronic in the extreme. Why should the outcome of a rally be anymore affected by chance than it already is?
The BEST solution that has ever been proposed to the solution is reversing the order of the top 10/15 OR allowing the drivers to choose their positions though this should only be done if the halfwit Garry Connelly isn't present at the rally. If driver X is the leader of the championship then why should he be disadvantaged? Why not let the sick dogs as NOT calls them, clear the gravel for the real drivers? |
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|