[tgs]

which we cannot drink!! think about that....

[HedgeYourBets]

just as 1/4 of earth is covered with soil that we cannot eat too.

[Fegasderty]

just as 1/4 of earth is covered with soil that we cannot eat too.

*clap clap*.... moronic reply at its best!
remember how i state about you asking people whether the ice cream is hot or cold? same thing applies to your logic here.

here's some biblical challenger for you.

http://www.singsupplies.com/showthre...iolent-jehovah


please go through all the biblical passages i posted from the OT, give me your best reply and defend this god character from all the atrocities, murders and genocide that he had committed. give me your best shot.

[Lt_Apple]

more than 99 percent of the creature that ever walk on earth had extinct, if they are really designed, the fucker that designed it has failed terribly.

Newman, Mark. "A Mathematical Model for Mass Extinction". Cornell University. May 20, 1994. Retrieved July 30, 2006.

[TorryJens]

Wah if men over fished no more fish blame God some more?

My primary school science teacher said rain comes from the evaporation of sea waters into the clouds which acts like a natural desalination plant in the air.

Isnt that awesome God's creation?

A floating water desalination plant.

Even men cant think of that.

Men can only think of carving useless idols on wooden blocks.

[Raj_Copi_Jin]

Wah if men over fished no more fish blame God some more?

My primary school science teacher said rain comes from the evaporation of sea waters into the clouds which acts like a natural desalination plant in the air.

Isnt that awesome God's creation?

A floating water desalination plant.

Even men cant think of that.

Men can only think of carving useless idols on wooden blocks.

dumb fuck, that is call work of the nature. your stupid dog has zero roles in it.

[tgs]

which we cannot drink!! think about that....

You are completely unaware about the science of oceanology! Just one reason for why the earth have to be 3/4 under sea (and there are many, many other reasons) is that the ocean of water serves as natural thermostat. Without this abundance of water regulating the temperature, it would be too hot in the day and too cold in the night for life to thrive. This 3/4 of earth covering with water has proved to be just right and to produce the climate that we all now can enjoy with.

[TorryJens]

more than 99 percent of the creature that ever walk on earth had extinct, if they are really designed, the fucker that designed it has failed terribly.

Newman, Mark. "A Mathematical Model for Mass Extinction". Cornell University. May 20, 1994. Retrieved July 30, 2006.

Rojak scientist (???),

Did you find out the reasons why so many creatures were made extinct? Sadly, more to come....it is a matter of time that all the fishes in the oceans will be extinct and we will have left with no fish to eat. Fish is one of the main source of protein.

Much of the animals that were made extinct was due to human depravity....check it out....Rojak Scientist (???)

[Big A]

dumb fuck, that is call work of the nature. your stupid dog has zero roles in it.

You think nature gives two hoots if you live or dies?

Nature will let you go extinct by not giving you cool clear water.

Why should nature have a feel for you?

Do you think you are important to nature that you have to be preserved?

[PhillipHer]

more than 99 percent of the creature that ever walk on earth had extinct, if they are really designed, the fucker that designed it has failed terribly.

Newman, Mark. "A Mathematical Model for Mass Extinction". Cornell University. May 20, 1994. Retrieved July 30, 2006.

How did Newman came up with the 99% figure?

[doctorzlo]

How did Newman came up with the 99% figure?

the paper is there and i have already posted it, why not you go read it yourself and stop demanding people to spoonfeed you? if you cannot understand i bet you will say its nonsensical. in that case stupid fuck, study harder and get into uni and learn some simple maths to understand its methodology

[HedgeYourBets]

You think nature gives two hoots if you live or dies?

Nature will let you go extinct by not giving you cool clear water.

Why should nature have a feel for you?

Do you think you are important to nature that you have to be preserved?

another stupid fuck that did not see the irony of it. of cos nature does not give a damn about us. water cycle is the way it is by the law of physcis/chemistry. your stupid dog has zero roles in it. i remember learning this in even pri sch. goodness now we have another one from this stupid religious group that did not even graduate from pri sch.

[Peptobismol]

the paper is there and i have already posted it, why not you go read it yourself and stop demanding people to spoonfeed you? if you cannot understand i bet you will say its nonsensical. in that case stupid fuck, study harder and get into uni and learn some simple maths to understand its methodology

No where in the paper did it talk about 99% extinction sir. Looks like you did not even read what you quoted.
Another ownage of vamjok.

Cheers

[doctorzlo]

Rojak scientist (???),

Did you find out the reasons why so many creatures were made extinct? Sadly, more to come....it is a matter of time that all the fishes in the oceans will be extinct and we will have left with no fish to eat. Fish is one of the main source of protein.

Much of the animals that were made extinct was due to human depravity....check it out....Rojak Scientist (???)

you overestimated the role of human in this, majority of it was due to natural stress

[Slonopotam845]

You are completely unaware about the science of oceanology! Just one reason for why the earth have to be 3/4 under sea (and there are many, many other reasons) is that the ocean of water serves as natural thermostat. Without this abundance of water regulating the temperature, it would be too hot in the day and too cold in the night for life to thrive. This 3/4 of earth covering with water has proved to be just right and to produce the climate that we all now can enjoy with.

Yet another silly excuse for god's incompetency. salt water is salt water. if god is soooo smart, he would have made it fresh water.

[Paul Bunyan]

No where in the paper did it talk about 99% extinction sir. Looks like you did not even read what you quoted.
Another ownage of vamjok.

Cheers

stupid fuck ah stupid fuck

stupid.jpg

thanks for confirming your stupidity. HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA NO WHERE IN THIS PAPER? HAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA KNN SI BEY KAM LAN.

[Lt_Apple]

another epic post confirming the stupidity of christians, all of the vocal idiotic christians really none of you ever attended higher form of education ?

i cannot believe the level of stupidity of christians here i faced in this forum.

[TorryJens]

Where in the article did it talk about 99% extinction?

[Lillie_Steins]

stupid fuck ah stupid fuck

stupid.jpg

thanks for confirming your stupidity. HAHAHHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA NO WHERE IN THIS PAPER? HAHHAHAHAHHAHAHA KNN SI BEY KAM LAN.

Scientist (???) Rojak,

OK...so what? That make it 99.999%, if you think 99% is still not good for you. What does all these mean....you said: It's because of nature's stress.....you cooking up story again...on one hand, the theory of evolution says (or implies) that somehow the process of natural selection has some form of 'imbedded' intelligence to promote and to enhance life from the most primitive to now, presumably, the most advance and now you saying the the stress of nature has caused extinction of animals, and 99% of them to date? Isn't this completely contradicted what evolution is all about? How come only in the recent years (relatively speaking in relation to the million or billion of years that evolutionists commonly referred to) that the stress of nature suddenly took place and has caused 99% of the animals to extinct? Would this 'intelligent' law of nature try, at least, to preserve them, or the law is now stupid enough to evolve something better of what nature has produced so far?

[Fegasderty]

you overestimated the role of human in this, majority of it was due to natural stress

Scientist (???) Rojak,

You are just a scientific joker! I can't find better word to describe you!

Isn't this completely contradicts the theory of evolution about natural selection? See my post above.....