LOGO
Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 06-23-2012, 10:15 PM   #21
doctorzlo

Join Date
Jun 2006
Posts
4,488
Senior Member
Default
Wow? Less species on earth? Sounds like 2nd law of thermodynamics in action, not evolution.
doctorzlo is offline


Old 06-23-2012, 10:21 PM   #22
Paul Bunyan

Join Date
Jul 2007
Age
58
Posts
4,495
Senior Member
Default
Yet another silly excuse for god's incompetency. salt water is salt water. if god is soooo smart, he would have made it fresh water.
Fishy (Author of the Toe-Sucking Song Book),

Even though about 1% of the world's water is fresh water, there is enough for everyone because the water will recycle back to the rivers and lakes that have mostly fresh water. The problem is huge amount of fresh water is now contaminated and largely due to industrialization.

The sea-water is no just salt water because the water is needed for marine fishes and corals to thrive. Almost everyday or at least once every other day, we eat fish and they are all salt water. Sea water is more than just salt water which has many other minerals and this is one of an important sources to supply some essential minerals for human consumption....certainly salt is one of them. We just can't live without salt.

And how's your Toe-Sucking Book doing....going to get it printed and published soon?
Paul Bunyan is offline


Old 06-23-2012, 10:40 PM   #23
Beerinkol

Join Date
Dec 2006
Posts
5,268
Senior Member
Default
Fishy (Author of the Toe-Sucking Song Book),

Even though about 1% of the world's water is fresh water, there is enough for everyone because the water will recycle back to the rivers and lakes that have mostly fresh water. The problem is huge amount of fresh water is now contaminated and largely due to industrialization.

The sea-water is no just salt water because the water is needed for marine fishes and corals to thrive. Almost everyday or at least once every other day, we eat fish and they are all salt water. Sea water is more than just salt water which has many other minerals and this is one of an important sources to supply some essential minerals for human consumption....certainly salt is one of them. We just can't live without salt.

And how's your Toe-Sucking Book doing....going to get it printed and published soon?
see? religious delusional believers have absolutely no cow sense. always looking for some ways to justify the existence of your big santa claus living up in the sky.

are you going to be nice this year so that your santa claus jesus is going to give you a big present? or will he burn everyone to a crisp because they wont want to bend down and stroke his little pee pee ego?

no? even Abraham want to kill his son for this crazy egoistic evil god.

well, tomorrow is sunday... church worshipping time, please go to your church to worship the psycho maniac god of yours.. telling him how much you love him despite his past killings of billions of souls and blood stains on his hands.
Beerinkol is offline


Old 06-23-2012, 10:59 PM   #24
Big A

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
50
Posts
4,148
Administrator
Default
Why complain about 3/4 of the earth that is covered with water ? At least, you should count yourself lucky not to be borne from some scum pond like some stupid scientists would want you to believe it.

You should only complain when you suspect that you probably might have emerged from such dirty water full of deadly bacteria. Salt water kills bacteria, rite ? Quite healthy mah.
Big A is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 01:12 AM   #25
MannoFr

Join Date
Mar 2007
Posts
4,451
Senior Member
Default
This 3/4 of earth covering with water has proved to be just right and to produce the climate that we all now can enjoy with.
Psalm23, are you already in heaven? Oh, never mind, there are no hurricanes in heaven. LOL!
MannoFr is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 02:48 AM   #26
S.T.D.

Join Date
May 2008
Age
42
Posts
5,220
Senior Member
Default
Scientist (???) Rojak,

You are just a scientific joker! I can't find better word to describe you!

Isn't this completely contradicts the theory of evolution about natural selection? See my post above.....
stupid fuck, this is in complete agreement with natural law of selection. this shows one thing, you have zero clue about what is natural selection. goodness, you guys are a complete disgrace to our education system.
S.T.D. is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 02:49 AM   #27
Slonopotam845

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,251
Senior Member
Default
Wow? Less species on earth? Sounds like 2nd law of thermodynamics in action, not evolution.
stupid fuck, you dun even know what is thermodynamic 2nd law as far as i recalled. linking less species to 2nd law? you are really a joke
Slonopotam845 is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 02:51 AM   #28
Raj_Copi_Jin

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
48
Posts
4,533
Senior Member
Default
where in the article did it talk about 99% extinction?
hahahhahahahhahahhahhahaha stupid hahahahahhahahahhahahahaha

my fault you dun understand and know how to interpret it ? HAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAH DUMB FUCK HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA
Raj_Copi_Jin is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 02:52 AM   #29
tgs

Join Date
Mar 2007
Age
48
Posts
5,125
Senior Member
Default
Scientist (???) Rojak,

OK...so what? That make it 99.999%, if you think 99% is still not good for you. What does all these mean....you said: It's because of nature's stress.....you cooking up story again...on one hand, the theory of evolution says (or implies) that somehow the process of natural selection has some form of 'imbedded' intelligence to promote and to enhance life from the most primitive to now, presumably, the most advance and now you saying the the stress of nature has caused extinction of animals, and 99% of them to date? Isn't this completely contradicted what evolution is all about? How come only in the recent years (relatively speaking in relation to the million or billion of years that evolutionists commonly referred to) that the stress of nature suddenly took place and has caused 99% of the animals to extinct? Would this 'intelligent' law of nature try, at least, to preserve them, or the law is now stupid enough to evolve something better of what nature has produced so far?
thanks for confirming the fact that you have zero clue about current theory of natural selection and evolution. the theory which you keep attacking when you do not even understand it. HAHHAHAHAHHAHAH STUPID FUCK REALLY EPIC HAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHA
tgs is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 02:28 PM   #30
radikal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
54
Posts
4,523
Senior Member
Default
stupid fuck, you dun even know what is thermodynamic 2nd law as far as i recalled. linking less species to 2nd law? you are really a joke

Yep, less species, less complex. Thats the 2nd law of thermodynamics in action. Extinction of species runs smack against the face of evolution. Thanks Vamjok for the evidence.
radikal is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 03:06 PM   #31
Slonopotam845

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,251
Senior Member
Default
Repent, Miss Kinana.....I foretell your being, I see u.....u r in trouble within yourself. U hv no friends, attending a small narrow-minded church at south-east zone. U r lonely, introvert n shy. U can't communicate n live well with ppl. U.....hide.......behind.........oh no....your previous boyfriend.....he..........Miss Kinana, it's ok, it's in the past. He.....
Slonopotam845 is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 04:22 PM   #32
softy54534

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,457
Senior Member
Default

Yep, less species, less complex. Thats the 2nd law of thermodynamics in action. Extinction of species runs smack against the face of evolution. Thanks Vamjok for the evidence.
HAHHAHAHAHHAHAH that is not the 2nd law stupid fuck HAHHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHAHHAHAHHAHAHA. 2ND LAW IS ABOUT CHAO IN ASSEMBLE SYSTEM DUMB SHIT. MORE DISORDER = MORE SPECIES IS NOT LESS COMPLEX HAHHAHAHHAH DUMB FUCK NO 1
softy54534 is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 05:55 PM   #33
brraverishhh

Join Date
Jan 2006
Posts
5,127
Senior Member
Default
You mean having less variety of species makes the earth more complex?
brraverishhh is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 07:24 PM   #34
tgs

Join Date
Mar 2007
Age
48
Posts
5,125
Senior Member
Default
You mean having less variety of species makes the earth more complex?
i confirm your intelligence is below average
tgs is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 08:19 PM   #35
Paul Bunyan

Join Date
Jul 2007
Age
58
Posts
4,495
Senior Member
Default
You see, once I twist the question around, it becomes apparent that your theory of evolution won't make sense. Even the evidence you showed contradicted your theory.

Cheers
Paul Bunyan is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 10:30 PM   #36
Ifroham4

Join Date
Apr 2007
Posts
5,196
Senior Member
Default
You see, once I twist the question around, it becomes apparent that your theory of evolution won't make sense. Even the evidence you showed contradicted your theory.

Cheers
LOL twist lan jiao la, whatever shit you mention earlier make zero sense. GO ON MAKE A FOOL OF YOURSELF, I WANT TO SEE WHAT KIND OF STUPID THING CAN COME OUT FROM AN UNEDUCATED FOOL THAT WISH TO ACT AS IF HE WENT TO UNI B4

this is like asking someone what he had for lunch and the person replied with where he went.
Ifroham4 is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 11:44 PM   #37
radikal

Join Date
Oct 2005
Age
54
Posts
4,523
Senior Member
Default
When these non Christians start using vulgarity, you know they have lost the debate again.

cheers
radikal is offline


Old 06-24-2012, 11:53 PM   #38
LottiFurmann

Join Date
Jan 2008
Posts
4,494
Senior Member
Default
thanks for confirming the fact that you have zero clue about current theory of natural selection and evolution. the theory which you keep attacking when you do not even understand it......
Dear Scientist (????) Rojak,

Oh....so now there is a 'current' one....and you mean the one provided by Charles Darwin about 150 years ago is thrown into the thresh! So...how many are there....and you are right....no one understand (and I wonder you too understand it)...because there are so many theories of evolution......by the way....any new one in the pipeline?
LottiFurmann is offline


Old 06-25-2012, 06:51 AM   #39
Drugmachine

Join Date
Apr 2006
Posts
4,490
Senior Member
Default
Dear Scientist (????) Rojak,

Oh....so now there is a 'current' one....and you mean the one provided by Charles Darwin about 150 years ago is thrown into the thresh! So...how many are there....and you are right....no one understand (and I wonder you too understand it)...because there are so many theories of evolution......by the way....any new one in the pipeline?
real retard LOL. that the issue with idiot that do not goes to sch
Drugmachine is offline


Old 06-25-2012, 12:08 PM   #40
9mm_fan

Join Date
May 2007
Age
53
Posts
5,191
Senior Member
Default
real retard LOL. that the issue with idiot that do not goes to sch
Dear Scientist (???) Rojak,

You still have not answer the question....what has happened to the original theory of evolution written by Charles Darwin....has been thrown into the thresh and it is now replaced with another 50 other theories?
9mm_fan is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 20 (0 members and 20 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:48 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity