Reply to Thread New Thread |
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #21 |
|
Yeah no problem my friend glad to have cleared things up. I not only study and research everything from militaries, economies, politics, history, etc. but also enjoy doing this as a hobby as I continue to enhance my knowledge and learn something new about a certain country every day. Yeah I partially agree with you that certain countries should not spend as much on military but should focus on improving their economies, health care and human rights issues. But you have to also understand for example my country Turkey is in a geographically key position and is surrounded by former enemies and dangerous, hostile and powerful countries such as Iran, Russia, Greece, Armenia, and the Middle East, etc. so they have to keep getting stronger and maintain a powerful well-equipped, well-trained and capable large armed forces to have a balance of power in the region and to deter future attacks on their soil.
|
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #22 |
|
U guys seem well versed on military issues, probably more than the news. Can someone tell whats the worst thing that can happen in the yellow sea? with the USS Washington aircraft carrier in place to carry out drills with the South and the North is threatening firepower.
Should a war break out what's China's stance. i mean it has to take a side and i'm sure it won't leave North Korea alone |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #23 |
|
|
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #24 |
|
It is true that North Korea is highly overestimated and probably will not last very long in a war with a major power or even a middle power as their economy and technological capabilities are very limited and weak. However they are considered the most militarized country in the world as they spend a huge amount of their GDP on military and pretty much the whole country is looked upon as an army and treated as such. They are very tough, hostile and paranoid due to the communist government which brainwashes its people to think this way especially towards the West, most specifically towards the US. Now I didn't mean to generalize saying they are tough, hostile and paranoid in my previous sentence but like I said they are brainwashed to think this way. Despite everything they have the 4th largest army in the world ahead of countries like Russia and still possess much military power/force that should be taken seriously, they are also developing and working on possessing nuclear weapons and have already succeeded in having some warheads according to some sources. Now Indonesia is ranked in top 15 as 12th or 13th in several websites I have come upon but when I looked more into it, I ranked them as 18th in the world. They have a very tough training system, and are economically growing as well, have fairly large and powerful army, navy and air force but still have some time to be considered powerful enough to be in top 15 or 12/13 in my opinion. I don't know much about African militaries but would rank Egypt, South Africa and Nigeria as the top 3, and the rest would follow. Anyway here's my extended top 20 to 30 if you or anyone else wants to know more: 16) Egypt, 17) Italy, 18) Indonesia, 19) Mexico, 20) Taiwan, 21) Sweden, 22) Greece, 23) Canada, 24) Spain, 25) Saudi Arabia, 26) Ukraine, 27) Australia, 28) Thailand 29) Denmark, 30) Poland. 1 brazil 2 mexico 3 venezuela 4 argentina 5 colombia |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #25 |
|
i partially agree with your list... but venezuela should be also into the top 30 imo. a latin american ranking is more like: 1. Brazil 2. Colombia 3. Chile 4. Mexico 5. Venezuela 6. Argentina 7. Peru 8. Uruguay 9. Guatemala 10. Paraguay Colombia's budget is well over $10 billion and Chile's also beats Mexico ($5.6 billion vs. $5.4 billion). I wouldn't shortchange Colombia and Chile. |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #27 |
|
i don't think military budget ranking per the 2009 is a good way of judging the armies of latin america. |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #29 |
|
Here are the top threes, but broken down into category. It's not as simple as using the term "best army".
By "Best", what do you mean? If you're measuring the LARGEST armies, then it goes 1. Russia (21 million including reserves and paramilitary forces) 2. North Korea (9.4 million including reserves) 3. South Korea (8.6 million including reserves) If you're counting the active military personel ONLY, it's as follows 1. China (2.2 million) 2. USA (1.5 million) 3. North Korea (1.1 million) If you're talking about the STRONGEST armies by nuclear deterrence (nuclear weapons stockpile) it's as follows. 1. Russia (11,000 nuclear warheads/ICBMs) 2. United States (8,500 nuclear warheads/ICBMs) 3. China (2,500 nuclear warheads/ICBMs) Lastly, if you're talking about the most CAPABLE/STRONGEST army in terms of reach, economy and provisions, it's... 1. Russia (capable blue water navy, not thinly-stretched around the world, vast resources, global reach, space capability) 2. China (largest military budget if you value the Yuan correctly, capacity for global influence) 3. USA (based in 180 locations throughout the world but thinly stretched and economically strained) |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #30 |
|
Top ten military means , not being ally.
Regarding Pakistan , Indian forces fight more than Pakistan. Size of Indian forces larger than Pakistan. India won all the battle against Pakistan. Pakistan Fight against only Islamic terrorist but Indian forces fight against Islamic terrorist , Communist Naxalists and Communist Maoist supported and trained in China . The Maoist terrorist are dangerous of all , like very brutal killing . Pakistan to fight against India brought numerous Islamic terrorist from around the world . Not a point here but , Bin laden was in Pakistan soil for more then 15 years as per Indian intelligence right? Can you justify Why Pakistan , from above points ? India is also Nuclear power. |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #31 |
|
I mean Being ally does not show strength. right ?
Iran has many in quantities but not guaranteed quality. Israel has less F-15 than Saudi Arabia , but Israel has many home grown products and one of largest supplier of defense . Israeli air force can carry many continuous strikes but it is difficult for SA . Same in case of Pakistan , were government it self i not stable . Can you evaluate my points and reply? I will be happy to find some replies or some new points. |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #32 |
|
Brahmos Cruse Missile is fastest in the cruse missile in the world.
Nuclear power Countries. Countries with Space technologies. Countries with good reserve forces. Countries with largest standing army . In case of India it is 1.2 million. Countries with aircraft carrier. Countries by technology. Many more you can add. Please continue the list. |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #33 |
|
|
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #34 |
|
Anti ballistic defense system is one of the important factor in securing its nation.
There are few countries which have developed this technology by their own . U.S.A - Arrow. Russia. S-300/400/500. China. Israel. - Arrow , Iron dome , Barak India. - Prithvi (PAD) and AAD. Soon Canada and France will be in the group. May be Japan , Korea and Taiwan. SAM , cruse , ICBM , Submarine launched , MIRV etc can be considered. |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #35 |
|
I agree with most of yours except:
1. USA, latest tech and weapoons 2. Russia, nuclear power! 3. China, gigantic army+navy 4. India, same as China 5. UK, special forces and spies 6. France, just; all-around 7. Turkey, hard commando training leads to very tough fighters 8. South Korea, technology 9. Israel, best tech in the world besides the US and maybe Russia 10. Brazil, rapidly growing economy and military Close behind are Japan and Germany 11th and 12th respectively |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #36 |
|
the world's most powerful 5th Army (american and Swedish scientists explained)
1- A.B.D 2- China 3- Russia 4- Turkey 5 - İsrael the number of the army that the expedition 1. Turkey 15.374.000 2. People's Republic of China 12.500.000 3. United States 10.426.000 4. Russia 10.037.000 5. North Korea 9.106.000 6. South Korea 6.087.000 7. Pakistan 5,619.000 8. Germany 5.480.000 9. Iran 5,545.000 10. Vietnam 2,484.000 |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #37 |
|
With all due respect any discussion of military power that does not give considerable conisderation to nuclear weapons is incomplete. Nuclear weapons are the most powerful and effective weapons in the world. A country with a large enough arsenal who has the means to deliver these weapons can project its will any where in the world at any time. While the US may still possess a "qualitative" edge at the moment over Russia and China, Russia has the largest and most advanced nuclear arsenal in the world at the moment, as well as the most advanced and reliable delivery systems for these weapons. In addition the US has allowed its nuclear capabilities and its delivery capabilities to erode in recent decades.
Russia's nuclear edge offsets any "qualitative" conventional edge the US may still have. China has vast numbers that the US cannot match. These vast numbers would quickly overwhelm any "qualitative" edge America may still possess over them. In a military confrontation with China, America would lose badly in a conventional figth. America's only option would be a nuclear one. Also, in any fight with China, America will definitely be fighting Russia also and very likely China as well. The same applies in a fight with Russia as well. If Russia needed assistance in a conventional fight, China would come to their aid. this would quickly overwhelm any qualitative edge America may have. With Russia's vast nuclear arsenal going nulcear against Russia is not feasible. Essentially China's vast numbers cancel out any qualitative edge America may have. Russia's nulcear arsenal cancels out America's nuclear option. In addition, a fight against either of these countries will lead to fighting the other as well. Also, Russia, China, and other nations have upgraded their militaries in recent years. America has not. As such, any qualitative edge America has oir may have is diminishing rapidly. Also, America has neglectd the "hard sciences" such as math, chemistry, physics, and engineering in its education system in favor of politically correct teachings such as "native American studies", "emancipation of enslaved peoples studies", "LGBT rights studies", "man caused global warming", and a plethora of other things. As such, America does not have the skilled personnel to remain competitive with up and coming powers or Russia and China for any length of time. Even if those problems of lack of skilled personnel could be solved, which would take a decade or more to get a handle on even if America changed its education system right this instance, America faces an additional problems of massive national debt and a crumbling infrastructure. Much will need to be done to address all of this. If this is not bad enough, America lacks any kind of manufacturing base to manufacture things to meet its basic needs, let alone build what would be needed to win a military confrontation with the likes of Russia and China. Given America's lack of the skilled personnel, the manufacturing infrastructure, its crumbling civilian infrastructure, and its massive national debt, there is almost zero possiblity that America is going to be able to compete with Russia or China in any meaningful way in the short to mid term or very likely the long term. Given these factors, America will continue to weaken while China and likely Russia will grow stronger. There's simply no way for America to realistically expect to compete. Also, America holds the position of being the most universially despised country on the planet. In any confrontation with Russia, China, or any other combination of powers, these others can count on help. America cannot. The hurdles for America are massive. I have no doubt that Russian and Chinese leaders wake up each and every morning thanking whatever god or gods they believe in that the problems their nations face are no where near as severe as those faced by America. Finally, America may be the most powerful nation today but, if so, given all the factors laid out above this will only continue to be the case for another year or so, two years at the most. Mid to long range for world powers would be as follows, if we are talking about winning a war. 1.) Russia 2.) China 3.) India 4.) Israel 5.) Iran 6.) North Korea 7.) Pakistan 8.) Brazil 9.) Iraq 10.) Venezuela The US is not even on the list. At this point, the US has no real prospect to be competitive as a major world power. In addition, it has Russia, China, Iran, and a host of other countries literally gunning for it. America should focus on its survival and not on global power. With all the issues laid out above, America's survival as a soverign entity is less than 50% over the next five year period and this assumes its current leadership is replaced with competent leaders. The problems have simply allowed to go on too long and have become to massive. Under current management, America's survival prosepcts over a two to five year period are less than 1%. Currently a list of the top military powers would likely be 1.) Russia 2.) China 3.) USA (a VERY distant third) The rest of the current list I could not quibble to much with, however, Pakistan should be listed ahead of the United Kingdom. France, and Germany. With all due respect any analysis of military power that does not consider nukes first and foremost is at best incomplete. Also, long range trends need to be considered as well. In the current situation America's prospects are dim and mid to long range they are even dimmer. Essentially America should not be ranked number one in military capabilities. In fact the country is not even close to Russia and China and barring something extrodinary the likes of which has been seldom if ever seen in world history the superiority of Russia and China over America in military force capability will only become wider in coming years. |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #38 |
|
1# is the USA
2# Russia 3# England and Germany tied China to me is not there yet they just got their first aircraft carrier used from the Ukraine. Yes some countries maybe a nuclear power. I would not expect any western nation nor China would ever use them. And the others that have them lack good delivery systems making them more of a local threat than global. If a power was to use nukes or bio weapons today I think the response would be devastating to them. I would also like to say some of the nations that has supplied troops for the global war on terrorism are great to. I had the honor to meet troops from Croatia Albania England in Iraq I know Romania Poland and Germany and many others have got into the trenches as well .And my Hat goes off to all my brothers in arms |
|
09-01-2012, 12:48 PM | #39 |
|
With all due respect and as a fellow American, I cant believe you made all these crazy assumptions based on what? America has its problems granted but so does every country basically in the world. Plus you loved to highlight this China-Russia pact but have you not heard of NATO? Plus the US has mutual defense treaties with numerous powerful countries around the world not in NATO ( Japan, Australia, South Korea, New Zealand) etc. Plus India would more than likely side with the US also. America is not doing great but there's hope still if we can keep President Obama in office and get rid of most of the obstructionist Republican element in both houses of Congress we could pull out of this malaise we find ourselves in now. I for one believe in America and its amazing ability of pulling together to get through anything. This is all conjecture of course but I felt I had to respond after reading such a negative view of America.
|
|
09-22-2012, 07:30 AM | #40 |
|
I'm a university student in my 2nd year doing a double major in political science and history and have been personally researching and reading/watching news, information and articles on world militaries also learning from my courses and from several websites I gathered (globalfirepower.com, globalsecurity.org, nationmaster.com, cia.gov, etc.) here are my top 10 and extended Top 15 militaries in the world according to my studies and research. |
|
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|