LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 09-11-2010, 05:04 PM   #1
Aozenee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default I think this is the first year...
I guess that the usual thread posters are waking up late today.
Aozenee is offline


Old 09-11-2010, 05:54 PM   #2
viagsjicguara

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
458
Senior Member
Default
On cue...

http://apolyton.net/showthread.php/1...1-Rememberance
viagsjicguara is offline


Old 09-11-2010, 06:32 PM   #3
forotis

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
400
Senior Member
Default
Politics.
forotis is offline


Old 09-11-2010, 06:35 PM   #4
Pete789

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
Of the people in my group I think only my manager was with the firm in 2001. Apparently they evacuated Lower Manhattan on foot that day.

EDIT: I guess technically his manager is also in our group, and was also with us in 2001, but I hardly ever talk to him.
Pete789 is offline


Old 09-11-2010, 06:40 PM   #5
spiveker

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
397
Senior Member
Default
Speaking of large holes in the ground, can someone explain why rebuilding has taken this long? I would have thought it could have been completed years ago.
Money.

Weeks before 9/11 the owners of the land, the Port Authority of NY and NJ (PA), gave a $1 billion lease to a local developer, Larry Silverstein. After the attacks, there was a long battle between that developer and the insurance companies about the size of the payoff. Afterwards, the issue became what was to be built on the site. Since Mr. Silverstein signed the lease expecting to make money off the office space that was then demolished, he wanted to have a rebuilding plan that would be profitable to him, while the PA had political considerations about what was going to be built where. For a long time they have argued about the amount of public subsidies that will go into building the 3 other office towers on the site besides the hideous Freedom Tower, an argument made worse by the declining economy and the lower need for millions of square feet of office space.
spiveker is offline


Old 09-11-2010, 06:47 PM   #6
ImmimiFruff

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
And it's "one world trade center" now, not "freedom tower" (thank god)
ImmimiFruff is offline


Old 09-11-2010, 06:53 PM   #7
Zhgpavye

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
538
Senior Member
Default
He's already got one client taking half the space in one wtc...
Zhgpavye is offline


Old 09-11-2010, 11:34 PM   #8
Allbrunette

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
375
Senior Member
Default
The war in afghanistan basically routed Al Qaeda years ago, and the Taliban are only interested in Afghanistan. I'd say it's a bit low.

We're still rooting out the Taliban on the theory that if we let them take over again, Al Qaeda will just come back.
Allbrunette is offline


Old 09-12-2010, 01:35 AM   #9
Faumpiggueria

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
324
Senior Member
Default
But they were primarily based there because the Taliban gave them a haven.
Faumpiggueria is offline


Old 09-12-2010, 01:41 AM   #10
tyclislavaify

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
407
Senior Member
Default
I doubt that Al Qaeda is doing better today than it was 10 years ago.
tyclislavaify is offline


Old 09-12-2010, 01:53 AM   #11
ClapekDodki

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
It's far better to be on alert, the way we were through all the Bush years, ever vigilant, looking around us wherever we went for...suspicious stuff of an unspecified nature. I tell you, those color-coded alerts really saved our asses.
ClapekDodki is offline


Old 09-12-2010, 04:07 AM   #12
Dr. Shon Thomson

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
416
Senior Member
Default
It isn't the only thing, guynemer.

Federal government extorting the states, child porn getting you stuffed on the sex offender list, unlimited economic regulation, and the inability of congress to have even the slightest grain of control over the military are probably even better places to start. Oh, and let's not forget government replacing criminal offenses with tax offenses, which changes the burden of proof over to guilty until proven innocent.
Dr. Shon Thomson is offline


Old 09-12-2010, 05:54 AM   #13
IteseFrusty

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
399
Senior Member
Default
We totally lost our minds on 9-11, and we haven't recovered our sanity since. Our current state of perpetual war is highly dangerous to our Constitutional rights.
Sorry, but what makes you think we were "sane" prior to 9/11?

Blaming 9/11 for our current condition is a convenient excuse for all the structural and societal problems we have in this society, none of which were caused by 9/11. I would agree that 9/11 might have brought out the symptoms of our commons disease faster than otherwise, but it isn't the cause of it at all.
IteseFrusty is offline


Old 09-12-2010, 06:07 AM   #14
galaktiusman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
415
Senior Member
Default
Not referring to that. I'm talking about how the federal government is no longer subject to enumerated economic powers. I also forgot to mention how we seem to be using the supreme court as a convenient way of avoiding amending the constitution.
And pray tell what were these supposed past "enumerated economic powers"?

Since when is there a singular way to read the Constitution? Claiming that there is just one way to interpret that text is about as valid as claiming there is only one way to interpret the New Testament. The great proliferation of Christian sects is solid empirical evidence of the wrongness of such a claim.
galaktiusman is offline


Old 09-12-2010, 08:37 AM   #15
mQb0aVZe

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
425
Senior Member
Default
That I have logged on to Poly on the morning of September 11 and not seen a "9/11 never forget" thread. I had stuff to do this morning. I'm glad Slowwy posted it.
mQb0aVZe is offline


Old 09-12-2010, 09:49 AM   #16
cepAceryTem

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default
"Unlimited economic regulation"?

Please, now there is some of the hyperbole that is responsible for the mess we are in.
I think that entire post demonstrates that HC hasn't a clue what he's talking about. I wonder where he's getting his information from.
cepAceryTem is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:13 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity