General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
Child benefit will be frozen for three years, public sector pay frozen and 25% cut from government department budgets. Cut public sector pay 50 percent, Government department budgets 50 percent in a year, and you'll close the deficit. Austerity? Hah. You aren't even cutting government sector pay at all.
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
What will they cut in the US to get deficits under control? Other things to get rid of: The tax deductions for housing and insurance. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#13 |
|
how is it absurdly high if you don't have as much taken directly from your paycheck?
Edit: Oh, regression? Hmm. Isn't there a way to make VATs progressive? Edit 2: Wait a minute how is it regressive at all? You pay based on your consumption. Rich people earn more and therefore consume more...you pay the same percentage of your income. It's not progressive OR regressive. Edit 3: Unless you consider that an additional dollar could have less marginal value than previous dollars...argh I'm confused. Someone clarify please ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#20 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 4 (0 members and 4 guests) | |
|