[wheettebott]

I suppose this is an attempt to equate homosexual sodomy with the sin of polygamy. Ben is having a Rick Santorum moment. How is this poly anything?

It seems all you have to do is list someone as your 'partner'.

Dog, cat, they are all loved ones too, no?

[bahrain41]

How is this poly anything?

It seems all you have to do is list someone as your 'partner'.

Dog, cat, they are all loved ones too, no?

Only you would consider dogs and cats subject to this form of partnership...
Is that because they are the only kind of sex partners you can get?

[Efonukmp]

Well it's clear from Ben's post that he not only approves of bestiality, but implies that he might actually participate in it. But that comes as no surprise since he belongs to a cult that promotes child rape.

[googlopharm]

Only you would consider dogs and cats subject to this form of partnership...
Is that because they are the only kind of sex partners you can get? Ewww, so you love your pets that way?!

[scoussysows]

Oh god, we can't have that. Not in God Blessed Canadia. Asher, they're gonna hafta cart you away. Sorry man.

[mrllxp]

how do gay men get newborn babies?

I mean I don't see some of these things as discriminatory. I don't support the idea of paying for men to go to gynecologists. Am I missing anything?

Lesbians can carry babies.

[NickGrass]

I can't believe that MrFun hasn't knocked people down on his way to a PC to post this news.

It's the proper decision.

Thanks Slowwy - I appreciate you taking up the slack here.

[UrUROFlS]

polygamy is a crime in the US

[XKAgustin]

It just dawned on me. Since I'm Slowwy and Ben is Benny, you must be Mystery.

[BrainTop]

God bless YOU, SP. That's exactly what his problem is.

[Nemerov]

That sounds like MrFun. NO sense of humor at all. Logic? Huh?

[jamemeveRhype]

It just dawned on me. Since I'm Slowwy and Ben is Benny, you must be Mystery.

[xjNo4zvD]

If you allow multiple partner benefits, employees can make benefit rings with as few as two.

Say you have 6 employees with a permitted two partnerships per person.

(A) = BC
(B) = DE
(C) = FA
(D) = EF
(E) = AB
(F) = CD

Now everyone gets the maximum two beneficiaries, no one is out benefits, and the employer is paying double benefits to everyone.

Or you could get something like this:

(A) = BC
(B) = AC
(C) = AB
(D) = EC
(E) = FC
(F) = DC

Everyone is a beneficiary of at least one other person, and C gets 5x benefits.

Every time you think he can't sound any more stupid, he proves you wrong.

[joeyCanada]

How is this poly anything?

It seems all you have to do is list someone as your 'partner'.

Dog, cat, they are all loved ones too, no?

Not only is this not true, but why should anyone care if employees are entitled to unpaid leave for taking their cat to the vet?

[aceriscoolon]

It's a lot different. You know it is.

[rouletteroulette]

Not only is this not true, but why should anyone care if employees are entitled to unpaid leave for taking their cat to the vet? By the interpretation here, I can't see why a pet couldn't be declared a partner, meaning you'd get time off if they were sick.