LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 11-03-2009, 01:24 PM   #21
Lhiistyssdds

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
469
Senior Member
Default
Nearly all? Can you get fixed rates, and if so, what the difference in the rates?
Lhiistyssdds is offline


Old 11-04-2009, 06:05 AM   #22
KahiroSamo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
461
Senior Member
Default
Boo hoo have a sook. I bet you voted Labour so it's your fault.
HAHA, what recession?
KahiroSamo is offline


Old 11-04-2009, 10:02 AM   #23
GEAntonio

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
408
Senior Member
Default
It is certainly not my fault, I never voted for Labour.
In Australia fixed rates are offered, but always at a premium and for a maximum term of 5 years. The higher rates on the fixed loans means it is very rare for the borrower to benefit from the fixed rates over the term of the loan and there are significant penalties for paying out a fixed loan early too, so going that way is generally a poor decision.
That's wrong. We fixed our home loan almost three years ago when rates were around 8%. The rate offered (7.5%) was lower than the variable rate. The fixed rate is worked out as the average of what they estimate rates will do. They must've figured rates would go down but got it wrong as rates went up higher at that stage. We enjoyed two and a half years of rates lower than the bank's variable rate till rate decreases brought it under that level start of this year. Now our fixed rates are about to end but we came out massively in front. You can also get any length of time for the fixed rates, just ask the bank.
GEAntonio is offline


Old 11-04-2009, 11:45 PM   #24
JohnVK

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
465
Senior Member
Default
The government is still pumping the economy full of stimulus spending and consequently once again just 4 weeks later our Resrve bank has raised interest rates by another 0.25% to 3.5%.
3.5% is still at "emergency" setting - ie, artificially low. The fact that interest rates are rising is because the Oz economy appears to have escaped the recession that afflicted the rest of the developed world.


So the governments spending which does not benefit me in any way has already begun chewing up my weekly income in a big way with these increases in interest rates, with more rises to come rapidly unless the government changes its policies.
The spending has benefited you big time - Australia didn't go into recession. If interest rates rise to normal consider it a lucky escape.
JohnVK is offline


Old 11-06-2009, 12:58 AM   #25
casinobonuswer

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
455
Senior Member
Default
They keep rising, our interest rates
The Reserve bank this week once again raised our interest rates, for the 5th time in 6 meetings I think. They are now at 4.25%. Many economists are predicting another 4 rises in interest rates this year so that they are 5.25% by year's end.
Stop complaining Trev, it's because the economy's going well, by international standards. The rate is still below normal, where it would be expected to be if growth were at typical levels (3-4%).

Of course our stupid government is still maintaining its stimulus packages, having defended them for so long, it is unable now to admit the stimulus was too large and has continued for far too long.
It's only finishing what it committed to. You can't stop projects that have already begun. Well, you can, but it's a bit of a waste, don't you think?

It is also trying to deny that many building projects associated with the stimulus has allowed the construction industry to rip huge sums of money from the government for relatively minor projects due to the rush to get them started, they have not maintained proper audit controls on most of the stimulus spending.
I'm not sure whether there is any denial going on there, but I agree the bureaucrats can't administer a project or bargain down a tender worth a damn. Not their money - why should they care? Disgusting, I agree.

After a number of deaths on a botched home insulation scheme due to electrocutions and house fires now in the hundreds, that is one scheme it has been forced to adandon, the cost of making homes safe may now amount to another 3rd of the money already spent on the botched scheme.
There were how many fires out of how many 10's of thousands of homes insulated? That whole thing is a beat up. It only applied to homes where foil was laid across the ceiling joists, which should never have happened in the first place as it's completely the wrong spot even to insulate. Greedy insulation companies who didn't properly train their installers. The companies didn't obey existing OH&S laws, or exercise due diligence. How is that the Government's fault?

So a stimulus that has overstimulated the economy, overstimulated many insulation installers with electricity, over stimulated many homes with too much heat causing fires, and the government still says it was the right thing to do.
Do you think our growth rate is too high? Weren't you the one complaining about job losses a while ago?
casinobonuswer is offline


Old 04-09-2010, 12:24 PM   #26
pooncophy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
498
Senior Member
Default
Are we certain the economy is no longer in need of stimulus?
pooncophy is offline


Old 04-13-2010, 10:13 PM   #27
acceraStoof

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
516
Senior Member
Default
Very selective use of data. The government briefly gave 21 000 to first home owners who built there own house. It now gives 7 000 (the same amount that has been availble for many years) to those same people, so yes it caused a brief rise in the data followed by a fall. A fall of around 10% in those circumstances is very modest considering the five interest rate rises in the same period as well. But the stimulus needs to end so that further interest rises do not do further damage to the construction industry.
Fair points. I guess it could be seen that way.
acceraStoof is offline


Old 04-15-2010, 06:24 AM   #28
DoctorNiCYDEn

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
515
Senior Member
Default
Instead of TARP and stimulus they should have cut everyone a check.
DoctorNiCYDEn is offline


Old 04-15-2010, 11:18 PM   #29
Breeriacoirl

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
377
Senior Member
Default
Trev, I'd be interested to hear what you think about this idea. Seems good to me.

It agrees with your premise of reducing government spending.
Breeriacoirl is offline


Old 04-16-2010, 11:54 AM   #30
LesLattis

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
616
Senior Member
Default
Let me know when the interest rates return to at least 1%. That would be a fraction of the 60 year rate but at least a sign the worries of deflation are over.
LesLattis is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 7 (0 members and 7 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:48 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity