[oB8LI2kP]

I suspect that if Trig had 46 chromosomes he would still be genetically predisposed toward retardation.

Edit: 2000! Woo!

[affewheillMapew]

Shut your talkhole ****tard.

WAS THAT ADDRESSED TO ME??

[letmelogin]

at the idea that it will ever not be an insult to describe someone as "retarded", "disabled", "learns differently", etc.

Whose idea is that?

[MikeGotTalentz]

@ Elok

[acceraStoof]

I suspect that if Trig had 46 chromosomes he would still be genetically predisposed toward retardation.

[insoneeri]

S

(I think Emanuel was out of line, but I guess I do not like hypocrisy)Sarah Palin - Queen of Hypocrisy and Political Correctness

No, that would be you.

[Gadarett]

Some tard's, obviously.

What I don't get is, why is it okay to call someone "incredibly stupid" but not "retarded," when the two are AFAIK near-exact synonyms? It's like if we were allowed to call someone a "genetically inferior watermelon-eating person of subsaharan descent," instead of "nigger." Tomato, tomahto.

Idk. "Incredibly stupid" kind of means that a person seems so stupid that you can hardly believe that they are actually stupid.

[GfBTWMmV]

Hi, I'm SlowwHead. I'm an idiot because I like stereotyping gay people.

[seooptiman]

I'm only a hypocrite because of sexual orientation. Otherwise, my philosophy of ecocentrism and equality is consistent.

Sorry, dudes, I'm happy with my social programming and you don't get none. I don't buy the whole "genetics" thing because in ancient Greece everyone was Bi and I don't think genetics have changed drastically since then. There might be an inclination genetically for some, but we have not really changed genetically since ancient Greece.

[KirillAristov]

I'm only a hypocrite because of sexual orientation. Otherwise, my philosophy of ecocentrism and equality is consistent.

Sorry, dudes, I'm happy with my social programming and you don't get none. I don't buy the whole "genetics" thing because in ancient Greece everyone was Bi and I don't think genetics have changed drastically since then. There might be an inclination genetically for some, but we have not really changed genetically since ancient Greece.

If this were true why would anyone be gay in a society that kills homos? For laughs?

I'm not saying that people can't be induced into societal behavior if there are great societal benefits at stake but that still doesn't explain why people are the way they are when there is a strong disincentive towards certain societal behavior.

[M1zdL0hh]

If this were true why would anyone be gay in a society that kills homos? For laughs?

I'm not saying that people can't be induced into societal behavior if there are great societal benefits at stake but that still doesn't explain why people are the way they are when there is a strong disincentive towards certain societal behavior.

Your objection is that society, a collective or a dictatorship of the prol controls everything?

Therefore, counter-counterculture cannot exist?

[SinncmxM]

Is that a rhetorical question?

[Biassasecumma]

I didn't say anything about gay. I said you're a hypocrite, and you are a hypocrite.
You're a hypocrite regardless of your sexual orientation. Once again though you have to make every single thing about gay, even if nothing was said about gay.

Right - using the word "queen" in reference to me is not stereotyping me as a gay man, nor mischaracterizing me.

[trubreTab]

Stupid little kitty looks like a queen to me.

That avatar needs a banana hat.

[Srewxardsasv]

I have said queen one time that I can remember, and it wasn't in this thread, because it doesn't fit the thread for me any more than it does for you.

The thread you reference was the one where you apologized "for all gays" and I asked who died and made you queen.
That fit.

[Zdfjpbth]

Why don't you STFU? How about if I go ask Thunderfall to let you come back? Would you go away then?

[Ndptbudd]

Nope, don't see how that would fit me. The stereotypical "queen" in regard to gay men being, flamboyant, obviously gay, or nelly/effeminate.

I do not have strong traits of any of those. Everywhere I've worked, in course of conversation with co-workers or outside work in certain social places/events, the presumption was that I was straight until something came up, that I had to politely correct their assumption.

Some people would be able to perceive that I'm gay, but more often that not, they don't until I say something.


EDIT: Also, I hate cross-posting.

[twiffatticy]

Yeah, because everything you bring up has gay added to the conversation. (See this thread.)
I would find some boorish straight guy talking of his conquests just as irritating.

Having a passionate interest in civil rights issues and human rights issues does not have anything to do with whether or not a gay man is a "queen."

And there are plenty of conversations over the years on this site, where I do not bring up my sexual identity. So you posted a patently-false and misleading statement. Congratulations.

[Fegemiembendy]

MrFun p-owned you, Sloww.

[Blelidupgerie]

Would you like to post a poll on it or just drop it?

You suck, and I feel sorry for you.