LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 12-31-2009, 09:59 AM   #21
loginptsa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
502
Senior Member
Default
Basically. If they escape, they'll get help because all the Muslims in the US are terrorist lovers.
Also, apparently guys from Iraq and Afghanistan memorize the locations of all the mosques in America, together with ways to get there covertly from nearby prisons, just in case.
loginptsa is offline


Old 12-31-2009, 06:21 PM   #22
MadMark

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
491
Senior Member
Default
Also, apparently guys from Iraq and Afghanistan memorize the locations of all the mosques in America, together with ways to get there covertly from nearby prisons, just in case.
It's part of their training
MadMark is offline


Old 12-31-2009, 07:56 PM   #23
gernica

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
575
Senior Member
Default
The thing is about 20% have rejoined the fight but that's rather astonishingly low. That means 80% either gave up or much more likely were never terrorists to begin with.



You need to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that every single 'show trial' they're having that you referenced is a waste of time. That is, you need to tell us how you know -- with all of the many elements at your disposal as an uneducated redneck -- why these people are doubtlessly guilty.

What a stupid argument. People are calling the NYC trials "show-trials" because the accused won't be released even if they're found innocent. They aren't fair trials.
gernica is offline


Old 12-31-2009, 08:36 PM   #24
Soresbox

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
356
Senior Member
Default
Don't forget that the Administration is only bringing to civilian trial those accused terrorists that it is confident it can convict. Those accused terrorists with weaker cases against them are going to remain in the military commission system. That's some triumph for fairness and the rule of law...
Soresbox is offline


Old 12-31-2009, 08:56 PM   #25
Mangoman

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
650
Senior Member
Default
It is about 100 miles north of Detroit (and Dearborn).

Way too close. Let's stick them in Yucca Mountain; we need to use that complex for something.
Mangoman is offline


Old 12-31-2009, 09:30 PM   #26
smifatv

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
356
Senior Member
Default
Basically. If they escape, they'll get help because all the Muslims in the US are terrorist lovers. Where did I say 'all' muslims? Abdullah Abdullah is helping him.

All I am arguing is that some of the Muslims in America are terrorist supporters, and that a significant number of those who are live in Dearborn.

That means 80% either gave up or much more likely were never terrorists to begin with. Or it could mean that they bought the farm. It could mean that they still are engaged in terrorism but they haven't been caught again. Lots of possibilities.

just had the ill luck to be foreigners in Afghanistan at a time when the US was offering a $10,000 bounty on foreigners in Afghanistan. To a goat herder living on $1 a day ten grand is a fortune so they swept up anyone and everyone they could and there were many cases of people turning in people they didn't like but who were innocent just to get the money. Oh really? That bounty was on Jihadis. Say you aren't an Afghani. You wander around in Afghanistan as a Tourist carting around your AK-47, and beating up on the locals. You might just be a Jihadi...
smifatv is offline


Old 12-31-2009, 11:10 PM   #27
JohnfAclambrJA

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
457
Senior Member
Default
Wow. Who could possibly argue with that air-tight reasoning?
JohnfAclambrJA is offline


Old 01-01-2010, 05:48 AM   #28
juptVatoSoito

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
568
Senior Member
Default
DF wouldn't recognize sarcasm if it smacked him in the face.
juptVatoSoito is offline


Old 01-01-2010, 07:46 AM   #29
Rqqneujr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
533
Senior Member
Default
You know what I love about liberals? They assume that everyone plays by the same rules. Sorry, but they don't. When we're dealing with terrorists, who we arrested overseas or in the process of planning terror attacks domestically, I think we can safely assume they aren't Carebears. That being the case, **** 'em. Lock 'em up and throw away the key, or better yet, just kill them. The concerns about punishing the innocent are kinda stupid, in the same sense that many "innocent" people in prison currently could have avoided prison by keeping better company. In other words, if you're not a thug/drug dealer/murderer/etc., but you hang out with those who do those things, don't be shocked or offended if you wind up "wrongfully" convicted. Yeah, it might not be strictly fair, but you could have avoided it.

Same for innocents stuck in Gitmo. Maybe if you'd vociferously denounced radical Islam and terrorism earlier in life, not provided any sort of aid and comfort to militants, and generally avoided anyone involved in terrorism, odds are you wouldn't be in Gitmo.

Personally, I think it's interesting that since 9/11, there hasn't been a successful terrorist attack on American soil, so, in the immortal words of Colonel Nathan R. Jessup, USMC, I would rather you just said "thank you", and went on your way.
I think liberals better recognize that there is internal conflict in muslim countries. Not all the people there support the terrorists. But thanx to guys like you and George W. Bush the terrorists now have more sympathy.
Rqqneujr is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 11:09 PM   #30
WertyNtont

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default
I'm embarrassed to be a Republican in Illinois these days.

The repugs are trying to fight the move of them to the facility in Illinois by claiming that it will make the state a target for terrorism. HUH

It's just embarrassing.

It's bad enough that the party hasn't offered any solutions at all, but just opposes anything the Dems propose in an attempt to make them look bad. The grand ole party looks pretty sad.
WertyNtont is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 11:21 PM   #31
DarrenBent

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default
I rest my case.

I'm just so embarrassed.
DarrenBent is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 11:23 PM   #32
KinicsBonee

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
474
Senior Member
Default
Silly Drake, don't you realise that solutions are for Democrats?
KinicsBonee is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 11:35 PM   #33
Grennios

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
522
Senior Member
Default
So you're shocked and appalled that the opposition is opposing the agenda of the majority. You're a real genius...
Grennios is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 11:45 PM   #34
Justlovemy

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
431
Senior Member
Default
Which part of his ageneda do you think they've been overly aggressive in opposing?
Justlovemy is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 11:49 PM   #35
illiderob

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
The GOP doesn't even have enough votes to go overboard in their opposition; they can't obstruct **** unless they get some Dems to help them. rah is just being a dipshit...
illiderob is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 11:55 PM   #36
RCQDnMp5

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
446
Senior Member
Default
My comment was more a general complaint about the my political party since the election. They've become the obstructionists. Granted that is not that abnormal for the minority party but they've really taken it to an extreme that I'm not happy with.
If only they were successful at obstruction.
RCQDnMp5 is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 02:33 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity