LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 01-06-2010, 03:42 PM   #1
ronaldasten

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
629
Senior Member
Default Why aren't progressives issuing primary challenges to incumbants like Right Wingers a
Arlen Specter started his term as a Republican but it looks like he's easily going to win the Democratic primary while Blanche Lincoln basically held his own party's signature piece of legislation (which has been in the party's platform for over 20 years) hostage while he threw a temper tantrum trying to outlaw abortion. Where is the progressive sense of revenge? When are they going to grow a pair?

I mean, like the tea baggers, these primary challenges would likely result in some races being lost but also like the tea baggers I bet the remaining Democrats would suddenly get religion about listening to the party's base.
ronaldasten is offline


Old 01-06-2010, 03:53 PM   #2
detskpit

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
350
Senior Member
Default
Two Democratic representatives and one Democratic governor have decided not to run for reelection.
detskpit is offline


Old 01-06-2010, 04:26 PM   #3
SpeavaJap

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
535
Senior Member
Default
Because they wouldn't win.
SpeavaJap is offline


Old 01-06-2010, 05:06 PM   #4
Misiotoagodia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
610
Senior Member
Default
Because they wouldn't win.
yeah
Misiotoagodia is offline


Old 01-06-2010, 06:30 PM   #5
spamkillerf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
607
Senior Member
Default
Blanche Lincoln basically held his own party's signature piece of legislation (which has been in the party's platform for over 20 years) hostage while he threw a temper tantrum trying to outlaw abortion.
If it makes you feel any better, Lincoln is likely going to loose her seat in part because of the vote made in support of Obama's health care reform.

Nelson's numbers aren't looking so hot now either but he's not up for reelection now.
spamkillerf is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 12:01 AM   #6
st01en_lox

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
414
Senior Member
Default
Does Oerdin really think Blanche Lincoln is a man? Her name is Blanche, for god's sake...
st01en_lox is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 12:07 AM   #7
Friend_Joe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
505
Senior Member
Default
Lamont was successful, he just had the misfortune of running against an exceedingly disloyal Democrat who also happened to enjoy considerable GOP support in his liberal NE state. The GOP was also a joke.

Lincoln and Nelson wouldn't fair nearly as well in independent bids, I doubt they'd even attempt them should they lose their primaries.
Friend_Joe is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 12:21 AM   #8
Abnorttrano

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
533
Senior Member
Default
The "right-wing" splintered because Bush made a disgrace of the country and the GOP. Perhaps if Obama bends over his lefty supporters a few more times, the Dems will spawn their own version of a tea bagger movement and have ideologically consistent challengers.

I would say the left doesn't have any platform as effective as the one the tea baggers use - namely, embracing the Founding Fathers of the United States.

Lefty Gaia worship tends to be the most powerful psychological driver of their belief, but that movement is falling apart in the US in the wake of Climategate and because of the economic costs involved in addressing the so-called climate change "crisis".

The left pushes its morality effectively with respect to certain issues (health care, etc.), but doesn't really have the spunk of a Tea Party movement which embraces the genuinely American ideals of great men like Washington and Jefferson.
Abnorttrano is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 12:38 AM   #9
erepsysoulperj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
387
Senior Member
Default
It's clear to me that the Dims are far more likely to tow the party line.
You don't get to call anyone else "dim," since you can't even get basic sayings like "toe the line" right.
erepsysoulperj is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 01:37 AM   #10
Katrinsitter

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
403
Senior Member
Default
EVERY group tries to tie itself to the founding fathers in this country, to add legitimacy. Hell, you capitalized the F's, Lotus.

We had the gang of 14.

That "we" being some Canadian group, I presume?
Katrinsitter is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 01:56 AM   #11
!!Aaroncheg

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
460
Senior Member
Default
The Teabaggers aren't concerned about the powerful federal government. They didn't exist under Bush, after all. They're concerned about a black man being president.
!!Aaroncheg is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 02:01 AM   #12
phsyalcvqh

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
506
Senior Member
Default
And Jefferson would be horrified that the cause of limited federal government was being co-opted by such ignorant, hateful morons.
phsyalcvqh is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 02:04 AM   #13
VeniHemealm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
468
Senior Member
Default
People who use the word "Teabaggers" don't have a serious point by definition.
VeniHemealm is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 02:33 AM   #14
amagmasia

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
429
Senior Member
Default
amagmasia is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 02:53 AM   #15
kictainiSot

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
536
Senior Member
Default
You mean besides the one with a dozen half black kids?
kictainiSot is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 05:49 AM   #16
LindaSmithXV

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
466
Senior Member
Default
People don't form their views in an information vacuum. Were the founders alive today they would certainly be heavily influenced by their contemporary peers and political environment, and likely much less "racist".

George III reportedly called Washington the greatest man in the world after he turned down a US kingship.

For their time, the founders were the ****.
LindaSmithXV is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 09:56 PM   #17
MasTaBlau

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
508
Senior Member
Default


It'd actually be pretty fun to bring Jefferson forward in time and watch him flip out.
MasTaBlau is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 10:19 PM   #18
suilusargaino

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
593
Senior Member
Default
I wonder what Jeffersons thoughts would be on mandates of health insurance purchases.
suilusargaino is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 11:20 PM   #19
DoterrFor

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
Who cares what the founding fathers would think? We are the forgers of our own future.
DoterrFor is offline


Old 01-07-2010, 11:23 PM   #20
Niiinioa

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
396
Senior Member
Default
Because he wanted to limit the Constitution. Bill of Rights is, of course, an amendment.
Niiinioa is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:08 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity