LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-18-2009, 10:43 PM   #1
Chito

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
545
Senior Member
Default Would this not be considered rude in China or something?
Did those kids get the e-mail?
Chito is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 10:49 PM   #2
Biradallo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
512
Senior Member
Default
ban them!
Biradallo is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 10:52 PM   #3
Anykeylo

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
402
Senior Member
Default
I'm losing interest. Let me know if the prof goes apeshit
Anykeylo is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:00 PM   #4
agrismhig

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
551
Senior Member
Default
It's a job-based system? Is it a mainframe type system?

There are priority levels on the system for a reason. Grad student's **** should be run as "nice"
agrismhig is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:05 PM   #5
iroxmxinau

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
404
Senior Member
Default
Asher, this prof's jobs will likely be run by HIS grad students. Very few jobs are actually run by profs. 90+% are grad students. Also, I'm not sure how "nice" factors into it (if it's the Unix type of "nice" which assigns system resources). The cluster assigns the next job in line for which there are adequate resources. So if there's 300 processors free, one guy submits job A for 400 processors and then the next guy submits job B for 200 processors job B gets run immediately while job A goes on the queue. It's not usually an issue. Even the big jobs get run within a day or two.
iroxmxinau is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:09 PM   #6
QuidQuoPro

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
597
Senior Member
Default
Seriously, though, they're going to need to set some protocols up soon. There's one guy who's been using 20-25% of capacity consistently (every time I check he's on this many processors) for the past 6 months.
QuidQuoPro is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:11 PM   #7
Cyzkrahu

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
477
Senior Member
Default
What kind of processors?
Cyzkrahu is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:18 PM   #8
greeferweq

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
375
Senior Member
Default
Not bad.

Congrats on the Rowland Prize?
greeferweq is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:21 PM   #9
QqJamxqP

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default
The three *******s' jobs have "disappeared" despite the fact that they had walltimes between 36 and 72 hours.

QqJamxqP is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:23 PM   #10
Xavier_Spinner_Wheels

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
656
Senior Member
Default
I hope you use the Intel compilers, not that gcc trash.
Xavier_Spinner_Wheels is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:24 PM   #11
Enjknsua

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
570
Senior Member
Default
The info on number of clusters seems to be out of date. Other than that, everything looks right.
Enjknsua is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:26 PM   #12
strmini

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
459
Senior Member
Default
Have to use gcc. All the makefiles are already optimized for it.


You might as well cover your code with molasses and wade around it with lead pants.
strmini is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:29 PM   #13
Phouepou

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
546
Senior Member
Default
Anyway, most of heavy-lifting stuff is written in FORTRAN.
So use the Intel Fortran compiler.
Phouepou is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:31 PM   #14
Saispapedlimi

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
522
Senior Member
Default
He probably compiled it with gcc.
Saispapedlimi is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:34 PM   #15
egershna

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default
WTF research could this ******* POSSIBLY be doing that has taken him 6 months on 300 processors?

Studying the effect of a mass zombie attack?
egershna is offline


Old 08-18-2009, 11:39 PM   #16
carpartsho

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
501
Senior Member
Default
This is why research needs to be better-prioritized. A couple of hours can help us learn the best way to limit the damage of zombie attacks, while it takes 6 months to do something useless like learning how to predict earthquakes or make better motor oil.

carpartsho is offline


Old 08-19-2009, 05:02 PM   #17
Qeiafib

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
526
Senior Member
Default
gcc is a 1984 Toyota Corolla to Intel's 2009 McLaren F1.

Intel's compilers are far, far faster. They'll utilize SIMD hardware far, far more often in far, far better ways. You can write some benchmarks yourself, or google for them.

http://www.luxrender.net/forum/viewtopic.php?f=21&t=603

On average, Intel's compiler is about 10-20% faster than gcc on the exact same code, sometimes much higher (depending on the use of vectors). 10-20% is massive for HPC.

If your compute nodes are x86, use Intel's compiler. If they're PPC, use IBM's compiler. They're both in another league from GCC in terms of performance. GCC is a utilitarian/toy compiler. The kind of **** you compile crappy desktop apps with.
Qeiafib is offline


Old 08-19-2009, 06:04 PM   #18
gooseCile

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
563
Senior Member
Default
What about Digital Mars, Asher?
gooseCile is offline


Old 08-19-2009, 10:49 PM   #19
Nafheense

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
517
Senior Member
Default

All his jobs are named EXACTLY the same thing too: "sliding"

???

****er. He's obviously either soft condensed matter or geophysics.
His name isn't Quinn Mallory, is it?
Nafheense is offline


Old 08-20-2009, 12:06 AM   #20
avappyboalt

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
329
Senior Member
Default
avappyboalt is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 11 (0 members and 11 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:10 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity