LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-12-2009, 12:33 PM   #1
buIf6yoW

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
481
Senior Member
Default How many sexual partners have you had
I doubt it.
buIf6yoW is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 02:35 PM   #2
hechicxxrr

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
557
Senior Member
Default
It said the survey covered people aged 20-59, I assume a 20 year old won't know what their lifetime score is so I guess it's their current value.
hechicxxrr is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 02:38 PM   #3
janeloveslifenow

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
422
Senior Member
Default
It said the survey covered people aged 20-59, I assume a 20 year old won't know what their lifetime score is so I guess it's their current value.
Mike, I suggest you look up how they calculate life expectancies. They calculate mortality rates among different age cohorts and then combine them to get an overall age.
janeloveslifenow is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 03:28 PM   #4
UKkoXJvF

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
453
Senior Member
Default
Just found the actual study. The median, which they report for men as 6.8 (?), is a crude number which is uncorrected even for the amount that the age structure of their survey does not correspond to the age structure of the 20-59 cohort in the US population.

The medians for age subgroups in their samples are as follows:

20-29: 5.4
30-39: 7.6
40-49: 6.9
50-59: 6.9

They don't appear to specify, but I'm interested in knowing what type of median they are using. The sample median will always be either an integer or half-integer for data restricted to the integers.
UKkoXJvF is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 04:00 PM   #5
Obebtetibre

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
Oral sex is only half sex
Obebtetibre is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 04:02 PM   #6
wmtravelservice

Join Date
Nov 2005
Posts
604
Senior Member
Default
Maybe the numbers are complete fabrications.
wmtravelservice is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 04:16 PM   #7
Gypejeva

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
Maybe they rate things on some funky scale.

Vaginal intercourse is worth 1
Oral sex is .5
Cleveland Steamer is 1.7
etc.
Gypejeva is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 04:38 PM   #8
Kiariitf

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
389
Senior Member
Default
Three people here have had sex with more than 30 women?
Kiariitf is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 05:31 PM   #9
Michmant

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
503
Senior Member
Default
Three people here have had sex with more than 30 women?
thats just nasty
Michmant is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 06:06 PM   #10
induffike

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
426
Senior Member
Default
Three people here have had sex with more than 30 women?
in a row?
induffike is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 06:19 PM   #11
iodillalm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
566
Senior Member
Default
huh. i appear to be the only person in my demographic.
iodillalm is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 06:29 PM   #12
Snocioncilm

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
445
Senior Member
Default
Damn homosexual orgies...
Snocioncilm is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 06:31 PM   #13
Orefsmisits

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
442
Senior Member
Default
Im 50 and have had a wonderful fullfilling life.

I have been married happily for 24 years, so leave 26 years for my +30 partners.

As a young miscreant, a bouncer in clubs, for 8 years plus living with outlaw bikers as a young and up and coming young strapping dude, its not that unreasonable to get 30 partners from age 14.5 to say 26, less than 3 partners/encounters a year
Orefsmisits is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 06:35 PM   #14
Vagtlaldo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
418
Senior Member
Default
It asked girls how many boys they slept with, and boys how many girls (as far as I could tell from reading the article).

Bisexual obviously wouldn't matter. Except that generally they have higher partner counts.

Transgendered should be a huge rarity... in the US it is just not that common.

JM
Vagtlaldo is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 09:10 PM   #15
Galvanoidum

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
485
Senior Member
Default
I've been sexually active since I was 21 and in those ten years of sexual activity, I've had **** buddies whom I would hook up with more than once, and then there are people I dated whom I had developed feelings for, and then there are people whom I just hooked up with once. I guess I will include all three of these types when I vote in JM's poll.
Galvanoidum is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 10:25 PM   #16
SpyRemo

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
390
Senior Member
Default
I'm above the median for my age cohort and the age cohort I'm about to enter. All the ***** I get from here on out is just gravy.
SpyRemo is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 10:37 PM   #17
Xiciljed

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
433
Senior Member
Default
I'm above the median for my age cohort and the age cohort I'm about to enter. All the ***** I get from here on out is just gravy.
If you're getting gravy, it ain't *****.
Xiciljed is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 10:39 PM   #18
9wQlZkIj

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
599
Senior Member
Default
9wQlZkIj is offline


Old 08-12-2009, 10:43 PM   #19
d1Bc25UP

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
438
Senior Member
Default
Oh and I'm above the median but my number has stayed constant now for 11 years
d1Bc25UP is offline


Old 08-13-2009, 12:06 AM   #20
Atmotteenrift

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
495
Senior Member
Default
I'm below, and am likely to stay there.

I know of only 1-2 physicists (who aren't swinger types) who would be much above. Even the one who had had a lot of women before graduate school, had settled down by the second year or so.

JM
Atmotteenrift is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:50 PM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity