General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#2 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
I don't remember "Jesus saves" as a message of the Planet of the Apes or its descendants. Which one was that, Frosty? Seems to me that animals that lie in ambush along a game trail are involved in planning, yet we have these breathless articles every few years saying "Animals Plan!" like that is new information. We really are a specieist species. "There has been scant evidence in previous research that animals can plan for future events." is utter nonsense. They put their nests in defensible positions; they select who in the pack will hunt and who will defend, leving one of the most dangerous behind in the case of wolves and lions. They do plan. However, they don't spend significant parts of their lives complaining that life is too short.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
...none of that is necessarily evidence of planning. It's more likely to be instinctive behavior for which the animals don't even comprehend the purpose; you might as well say that a horse growing a long tail is a clear sign that it anticipates biting flies landing on its arse. It's nothing of the sort. The ability has merely been programmed in by evolution so that the animal has all the tools required to survive when the time comes. This case is different because it's clear the animal discriminates between different wholly artificial sets of circumstances which are very unlikely to have been selected for. It is perceiving a situation, analyzing it, and coming up with a plan to deal with it. Also being a total antisocial douchebag, but I guess researchers already knew chimps can be like that. |
![]() |
![]() |
#10 |
|
Elok, you are presenting a very prejudiced view of man's place in the animal kingdom. No one who has followed large predator behavior patterns believe their hunting styles are "instinctive" rather than exhibitions of planning. It is instinctive for them to hunt, but the how indicates planning.
I'll skip other examples to point out that this theory that all animal behavior is instinctive, generally grows out of the arguments about man having a soul, which gives him choices in his behavior. THAT argument in turn arises out of the mind/body dichotomy very much in debate at the time of Christ. Short summary : Only mankind has a soul which gives him choices for good or evil independent of the needs and urges of his body. Therefore, a whole bunch of things including the rest of the animal kingdom operates on instinct only. Neither Sufis or scientists would find that blather meaningful. For the Sufis, it is not your soul that gives you choices, the power of choice is inherent in you. There is no mind - body dichotomy. To the scentists, all adaptation by animals in the wild, changing behaviors and patterns is thinking, not instinct. Thus many animals exhibit rudimentary planning, adapting, hunting, tool-using behaviors indicating they think. None show thinking on our scale with language, mathematics, abstractions, long-range projections,speculations, or creations of deities; but they do mourn, adapt, plan, and abandon non-productive patterns. |
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|