DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate

DiscussWorldIssues - Socio-Economic Religion and Political Uncensored Debate (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/)
-   General Discussion (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/general-discussion/)
-   -   Important Poll: B5 vs DS9 (http://www.discussworldissues.com/forums/general-discussion/105925-important-poll-b5-vs-ds9.html)

ImmitsRom 02-02-2009 04:29 PM

Important Poll: B5 vs DS9
 
Quote:

These shows, were so like, similar and all. Both tok place on space statians, and had story -isre- and bars and females 1st officers and annoying doctor characters and wars with bad aliens and such and they were aired at the same the time. Which do do you thinx is better?
Toktok statians Ottok

DP????

oB8LI2kP 02-02-2009 04:31 PM

I agree http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/smile.gif

jaydicassdhy 02-02-2009 04:33 PM

http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...lies/angry.gif

Should be Deep Space!!!! http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/nod.gif

en-druzhba 02-02-2009 04:35 PM

Worf Sisxo and Dax http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...es/naughty.gif

wentscat 02-02-2009 04:58 PM

This is a ****ing serious therda peaple. Stop smucking ti up.

happyman 02-02-2009 05:05 PM

I don't know, B5 seems kind of cheap sometimes, lixe they ran out of money 5 episodes early. They have better story line thought and isnt star trek. DS9 looks nicer but the plots are mostly less seriouns and happy but they have some better characters. I think i like B5 better.

NumDusthouh 02-02-2009 05:20 PM

B5 hands down.

Aagotiq 02-02-2009 05:24 PM

B5 actually deasls with interesting issues rather than pissed off wormhole aliens and New Deal Ferrigians.

Plaumpholavup 02-02-2009 05:27 PM

Quote:

This is a ****ing serious therda peaple. Stop smucking ti up.
This is also one of the geekest threads that's ever existed on these forums. http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/nod.gif

freflellalafe 02-02-2009 05:45 PM

And she possed for playboy in 1999 and did some full nudity in a movie or two. WINNER.

(an attempt to make this thread just a bit less nerdy)

ebonytipchik 02-02-2009 05:55 PM

http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gifhttp://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gifComparing these two is rather like comparing an Agatha Christy mystery with a Nancy Drew mystery. B5 was a well thought space adventure for adults with a convincing story arc. The acting and costuming were designed to reflect credibly a conceptual galaxy in which events have triggered a showdown. Deep Space 9 is part of a much less credible "family-friendly" star trek universe. Further, the show's focus was mostly toward "look what stopped in at the inn coming from somewhere and going somewhere." The Captain and one native female character were well rounded by good actors. But B5 was infinitely superior in making the audience think. http://www.discussworldissues.com/im...ons/icon14.gif

irresseni 02-02-2009 07:18 PM

Babylon 5 looks retarded. I could never get past the first episode.

dosugxxx 02-02-2009 09:17 PM

Can't we like both series?

newpiknicker 02-02-2009 09:25 PM

Sez you. I liked both. B5 was better, but I liked DS9 because it brought back the bickering between the characters, not really seen since TOS. I liked it a lot more than TNG.

alenbarbaf 02-02-2009 09:39 PM

Likeingness isn't a matter of degrees. Either you do or you don't. And so the only way you can like one more than the other is to like one and dislike the other.

Nothatspecial 02-02-2009 09:42 PM

Quote:

And overall the acting was on a totally different level. (on the good side)
Wait--seriously? The only good actor on B5 was the guy who played G'Kar.

zenihan 02-02-2009 10:35 PM

Quite, Stephen Hawking is a crap actor.

citalopram 02-02-2009 10:52 PM

Quote:

IMO seriously yes.
Londo Mollari was well done especially in the later episodes when he was emperor.
Susan Ivanova, enough said,
Vir was always excellent.
G'Kar, agreed.
Michael Garibaldi was also well done.

a lot of the charaters that had smaller parts were also done much better.
A lot of special guests stars in Star Trek (not just DS9) where in because they were famous and not necessarily because they were good actors.
I don't remember too many DS9 guests who were there because they were famous. Despite liking both series a lot, I think the acting was better in DS9.

overavantstandard 02-02-2009 10:56 PM

Quote:

Can we like neither?

JM
Warsie! http://www.discussworldissues.com/fo...milies/mad.gif

shumozar 02-03-2009 12:05 AM

I think they're equally good, B5 wins for the master storytelling (apart from the hideous 5th season) and DS9 wins for the casualness and re-wachtability...


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 04:55 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2