[sisuarmalmicy]

Of course not.

Anyway, completely unintentional humor: pr0n with someone getting a shot in the face from a chick's cheney.

[domeffire]

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles

Is the simple fact that someone else's penis may be visible turns it gay? Correct.

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles
So, wait, wouldn't that make all straight porn kinda gay? Since there are penises not your own dancing about. Correct.

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles
And lesbian porn, which is generally made for straight boys, is pretty gay, since it's about women doing women. False. The point is so that the viewer can imagine himself joining in, meaning they are in fact merely preparing each other for the viewer, not lesbian per se.

[quack!]

I wouldn't know anything about that, but it's all in the eye of the beholder.

[budumol]

Because homopenises are bigger.

[abOfU9nJ]

It's the only explanation.

[jenilopaz]

While a lot of lesbians could make cute boys, my lesbian friends tend to look too much like girls.

They have more boyish sensibilities than I do, but that's different.

[Loopyjr]

Originally posted by Timexwatch
* Two or more guys spanking it in the same room in close physical proximity to each other and/or within each others visual field and no real life women present (rule does not apply to military members in a combat zone) = DEFCON five gay
* Two or more guys spanking it in the same room not in close physical proximity to each other and not within each others visual field and no real life women present (rule does not apply to military members in a combat zone) = DEFCON three gay The lower a defcon number is, the worse it is. So clearly, to be less gay when masturbating in the same room as another man, one just has to sidle up to him.

* Pornography featuring 'Chicks with dicks' = Gay And yet, the market for this is not with gay men.

[KLhdfskja]

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles

The lower a defcon number is, the worse it is. So clearly, to be less gay when masturbating in the same room as another man, one just has to sidle up to him. Fixed.


And yet, the market for this is not with gay men. The market is closet cases. Out guys have no need.

and two of the men are having sex with each other. Then this applies to them: Two or more men engaged in a circle jerk and/or other sexual activity = Absolutely and unequivocally gay

[optormtix]

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles

What about men patting each other on the ass, like in American "Football"?

And what about a man giving another man flowers? Easy answer: Not sexual activity, so not gay unless there is intentional squeezing, lingering and/or caressing.

And what about a man giving another man flowers? Depends on the intentions of the giver. Generally falls more under the classification of "kind of fruity" (for lack of a better term).

[Proodustommor]

Originally posted by SlowwHand
I never understood a straight guy getting worked up over lesbians. I guess I'm just weird. No comments required. Only if you are in the middle/between them.

[casinoboneerer]

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles
Why are straight boys so afraid of other men's penises? Who said anything about "afraid"? We simply don't find the sight of sweaty, smelly ball-slapping all that appealing in a sexual context. It's pretty ugly in fact. That doesn't mean we cover our eyes in a communal shower, tape black boxes over pictures in biology textbooks, etc.; those remain outside a sexual context and are therefore kosher.

Anyway, timex's detailed analysis sums it up better than I ever could. However, it's missing nuance on one point: when I let another man suck my ****, but there is no penis in my field of vision and I pretend it's a chick doing it, that's totally not gay. Otherwise I and half of my comrades on the USS Reagan were sorely mistaken.

[pharmaclid]

Originally posted by Darius871


Who said anything about "afraid"? We simply don't find the sight of sweaty, smelly ball-slapping all that appealing in a sexual context. It's pretty ugly in fact. That doesn't mean we cover our eyes in a communal shower, tape black boxes over pictures in biology textbooks, etc.; those remain outside a sexual context and are therefore kosher.

Anyway, timex's detailed analysis sums it up better than I ever could. However, it's missing nuance on one point: when I let another man suck my ****, but there is no penis in my field of vision and I pretend it's a chick doing it, that's totally not gay. Otherwise I and half of my comrades on the USS Reagan were sorely mistaken. If you would have said..Otherwise, everyone on the USS Reagan were sorely mistaken then one could call spot on

[GitaraMoya]

Originally posted by Docfeelgood
Seems to me that people who pick on gays are not well-adjusted with there own sexuality. Who here has been picking on gays? We're just trying to clarify the intricacies of ManLaw for the uninitiated.

[Qnpqbpac]

Originally posted by Docfeelgood
Seems to me that people who pick on gays are not well-adjusted with there own sexuality. I certainly agree This thread is certainly not a case of that! People should be free to move as far to either side on the sexuality spectrum as they want.

[Sironimoll]

Originally posted by Darius871


Who said anything about "afraid"? We simply don't find the sight of sweaty, smelly ball-slapping all that appealing in a sexual context. It's pretty ugly in fact. That doesn't mean we cover our eyes in a communal shower, tape black boxes over pictures in biology textbooks, etc.; those remain outside a sexual context and are therefore kosher.

Anyway, timex's detailed analysis sums it up better than I ever could. However, it's missing nuance on one point: when I let another man suck my ****, but there is no penis in my field of vision and I pretend it's a chick doing it, that's totally not gay. Otherwise I and half of my comrades on the USS Reagan were sorely mistaken.
I'm disappointed.

Not one crack about seamen?

[tobaccoman]

Originally posted by Mrs Snuggles



I'm disappointed.

Not one crack about seamen? As in, seamen in a crack?

[massons]

Originally posted by Darius871
However, it's missing nuance on one point: when I let another man suck my ****, but there is no penis in my field of vision and I pretend it's a chick doing it, that's totally not gay. Otherwise I and half of my comrades on the USS Reagan were sorely mistaken. One man sucking another man's anything is behavior generally characterized as "gay." Sailors (and other military folks) do not get off that easily. And yes, I am a veteran with time in a warzone.

I have come more and more to the conclusion that almost everybody is bisexual. How much much that shows depends on the person's self-image and personal reflection of what that person thinks society will think. Someone earlier labelled this sociatal sensitivity as "fear" and activated the macho of almost every male on the board. Still, if you tried sex with same sex and liked it, you are a little bit homo. Don't let it fluster you. Since the 1960's most people are willing to acknowledge these experiences in selected private settings or in public. An encounter of this kind appears to be almost universal.