LOGO
General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here.

Reply to Thread New Thread
Old 08-08-2008, 10:44 PM   #1
DrJonson

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default Life in prison in UK is ... 12 years?!
Just read this story about a teenager killed by a 16 year old because he gave him a 'dirty look', the offender gets 'life' apparently but it says he needs to serve a 'minimum of 12 years':

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/london/7548842.stm

How is 12 years life?! It's more like 1/6th of life it would be a disgrace if he got out in 2020 and has robbed that boy and their family forever. There aren't many things I envy about America but their length prison sentences for murderers is one thing I do...
DrJonson is offline


Old 08-08-2008, 10:50 PM   #2
engideNedmupe

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
471
Senior Member
Default
Might it have something to do with that whole once you become an adult, your youth crimes are thrown out? Doesn't sound like it (since he would be 28).
engideNedmupe is offline


Old 08-08-2008, 10:58 PM   #3
gZAhTyWY

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
eh they should just hang him
________
weed vaporizers
gZAhTyWY is offline


Old 08-08-2008, 10:58 PM   #4
finasteridonline

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
542
Senior Member
Default
Regardless of the term served, life can still be life. (either killed inside or screwed up so much you have no life to go back to)
finasteridonline is offline


Old 08-08-2008, 11:15 PM   #5
Dvjkefdw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
521
Senior Member
Default
Just read this story about a teenager killed by a 16 year old because he gave him a 'dirty look', the offender gets 'life' apparently but it says he needs to serve a 'minimum of 12 years':
That doesn't mean he'll be automatically out of prison in 12 years time - it just means that he'll be eligible for parole then.
Dvjkefdw is offline


Old 08-08-2008, 11:19 PM   #6
DrJonson

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
411
Senior Member
Default
That doesn't mean he'll be automatically out of prison in 12 years time - it just means that he'll be eligible for parole then.
I'm fully aware of that, but he shouldn't be! If a person killed someone close to you in cold blood and you knew they would be 'eligible' for release in 12 years how would you feel?
DrJonson is offline


Old 08-08-2008, 11:21 PM   #7
brulpcoersero

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
394
Senior Member
Default
Life = 20 years from what I heard, but if your good you can do 12 years, my uncle did 14 years back in the 70's 80's for a life sentence.
brulpcoersero is offline


Old 08-08-2008, 11:24 PM   #8
Dvjkefdw

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
521
Senior Member
Default
I don't know how I would feel but I do know that, as I am presently, I believe human beings deserve the chance to redeem themselves somehow, and in this case, he has 12 years to do so. Should he fail, then it's unlikely parole will be issued and he will remain in prison.
Dvjkefdw is offline


Old 08-08-2008, 11:27 PM   #9
brulpcoersero

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
394
Senior Member
Default
That's right, for young people like that spending 12 years locked away can help them and maybe change there ways, but I know people who have been locked up and told me it's actually made them more of a criminal because you can learn so much inside and gain so many good contacts.
brulpcoersero is offline


Old 08-08-2008, 11:42 PM   #10
MilenaMKB

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
570
Senior Member
Default
eh they should just hang him
You propose executing a juvenile?
MilenaMKB is offline


Old 08-09-2008, 01:28 AM   #11
MedicineForUs

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
389
Senior Member
Default
The UK law system is a disgrace, on top of that the law about "smacking" your children is a disgrace too, you not even allowed to disapline your own child anymore, and just now are we seeing the fruits of the governments system, so much crime from young offenders now a days is just insane. BUT on a good note its alot of revenue from fines for the government, There very clever.[thumbdown] Theres just no deterrent from a young person turning out to be a scumbag anymore, and the real meaning of respect, and respect for your fellow human being has been lost to the younger generation.
MedicineForUs is offline


Old 08-09-2008, 01:32 AM   #12
gZAhTyWY

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
You propose executing a juvenile?
he felt that he could.

im not literally saying to hang him. but he wont learn anything in jail
________
BMW Rennsport
gZAhTyWY is offline


Old 08-09-2008, 01:43 AM   #13
borasolit

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
412
Senior Member
Default
I don't know how I would feel but I do know that, as I am presently, I believe human beings deserve the chance to redeem themselves somehow, and in this case, he has 12 years to do so. Should he fail, then it's unlikely parole will be issued and he will remain in prison.
[no]

I dont care if they did redeem themselves.

Its what they did not what they might not do in future if the British legal system is nice and cushy to them.

Sickens me.
borasolit is offline


Old 08-09-2008, 01:43 AM   #14
Marat

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
Send him to Old texas to be charged.
Marat is offline


Old 08-09-2008, 01:49 AM   #15
MilenaMKB

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
570
Senior Member
Default
he felt that he could.

im not literally saying to hang him. but he wont learn anything in jail
What do you propose then?

The UK law system is a disgrace, on top of that the law about "smacking" your children is a disgrace too, you not even allowed to disapline your own child anymore, and just now are we seeing the fruits of the governments system, so much crime from young offenders now a days is just insane. BUT on a good note its alot of revenue from fines for the government, There very clever.[thumbdown] Theres just no deterrent from a young person turning out to be a scumbag anymore, and the real meaning of respect, and respect for your fellow human being has been lost to the younger generation.
I don't see how a law that was only passed a few years ago will have had any effect on the upbringing of a person who's a teenager now.
MilenaMKB is offline


Old 08-09-2008, 02:02 AM   #16
Fainnamoony

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
513
Senior Member
Default
I do believe that 12 years is just not enough, he'll be my age when he comes out and life is far from over.
Fainnamoony is offline


Old 08-09-2008, 02:18 AM   #17
Fdmnrnba

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
478
Senior Member
Default
The UK law system is a disgrace, on top of that the law about "smacking" your children is a disgrace too, you not even allowed to disapline your own child anymore, and just now are we seeing the fruits of the governments system, so much crime from young offenders now a days is just insane. BUT on a good note its alot of revenue from fines for the government, There very clever.[thumbdown] Theres just no deterrent from a young person turning out to be a scumbag anymore, and the real meaning of respect, and respect for your fellow human being has been lost to the younger generation.
Yeah, I don't like the law about not allowing you to smack your children.

Other kids got it easy cos they got smacked, my mum ran after me with a damn bamboo feather duster. Those things bloody killed. And when I hid it, she improvised.

Now look at me, I turned out fine....*twitches*
Fdmnrnba is offline


Old 08-09-2008, 02:33 AM   #18
gZAhTyWY

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
434
Senior Member
Default
What do you propose then?
well good question. i would think that since someone took someone elses life they shouldnt have the ability to live there. life meaning actual life... no chance to get out. put him to work for the government to help better the city and help him have a some what 'normal' life without actually being free.
________
vaporizers
gZAhTyWY is offline


Old 08-09-2008, 02:38 AM   #19
lalpphilalk

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
440
Senior Member
Default
TBH, I think he should get 50 years at the minimum. I also believe that the majority of people wouldn't redeem themselves and therefore shouldn't get the chance to.
lalpphilalk is offline


Old 08-09-2008, 02:43 AM   #20
brulpcoersero

Join Date
Oct 2005
Posts
394
Senior Member
Default
Yeah, I don't like the law about not allowing you to smack your children.

Other kids got it easy cos they got smacked, my mum ran after me with a damn bamboo feather duster. Those things bloody killed. And when I hid it, she improvised.

Now look at me, I turned out fine....*twitches*
You don't need to hit kids to teach them respect and discipline, if anything that makes them worse in the future, you can easy teach kids respect without using violence which is wrong against children. My friends family who I use to hang around with when I was a Kid, he's got like 5 brothers, his dad is some nutter and his mum isn't much better, any time they did anything wrong, beat them up m8, broom stick round the head or a belt round the body, did it help them? well there all older now and all bloody nutters and crinimals.
brulpcoersero is offline



Reply to Thread New Thread

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:16 AM.
Copyright ©2000 - 2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO 3.6.0 PL2
Design & Developed by Amodity.com
Copyright© Amodity