General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#22 |
|
Originally posted by snoopy369
Don't tempt me ... one of these days I shall see LS's postcount reduced by a significant amount, and it shall be me doing the reducing. ![]() It will be something poetic, like "divide his postcount by pi" or "give him the natural logarithm of his postcount". ![]() ![]() Let me know when you're about to PCR him. Then I can do it too and pretend I didn't that you were going to, for twice the effect. Diving by Pi sucks, though. Let's divide by Planck's constant! |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
Originally posted by Solver
![]() Let me know when you're about to PCR him. Then I can do it too and pretend I didn't that you were going to, for twice the effect. Diving by Pi sucks, though. Let's divide by Planck's constant! Erm, if you divided it by Planck's constant, you'd end up with a post count nearly 35 orders of magnitude larger ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
Originally posted by Lancer
Did I do that right? Took 2 from Ming, gave to rah, took 2 from Locutus (he hates Santa) and gave to Solver. The rest are a wash. No, you can only take 2 and give 2 once, not twice ![]() Don't worry, I'll fix it for you! ![]() I'll halve each vote of yours (i.e. Ming -1, rah +1, Locutus -1, Solver +1) ![]() 12 DanQ 7 Ming 14 Rah 8 Locutus 9 Gramphos 10 Solver Is teh correct score after Ben's vote. |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|