General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#1 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
|
You know, palini, I appreciate this thread. It never occurred to me that one would make a public record of something like this. And even though I'm no scholar of the law, it seems to me a public declaration would be a prudent thing to do in this sort of situation. |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#7 |
|
As I understand it, notices in newspapers are offers. The receiving party has the opportunity to counter-off, and for some weird reason, the law considers silence to be acceptance. You: *no response* Me: *slowly reaches for cornbread* Of course, you would still have 3 days to decide if you wanted your cornbread back. |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#9 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#11 |
|
Here is a classic.
![]() Notice that the gentleman does not demand his errant spouses creditors to cancel their just debts from BEFORE the date of the notice. He is on the hook for those. Only the debts AFTER the date of notice are going to be denied. The gets back to the 14th amendment section IV But neither the United States nor any State shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void. The 14th amendment was put into practice in 1868. The (un)civil war was long over. In the context of paying for the debts of the south this notice is a NON-STARTER. Notices only take effect AFTER the notice has been published. So what insurrection? Why, the 14th amendment, of course. This amendment throws out the entire organic constitution and anyone who derives any benefits from it are in insurrection (even as the amendment acknowledges). |
![]() |
![]() |
#14 |
|
Unless I miss my guess the land owners of Lyndon township in Vermont are being noticed by their clerk that they owe some tax or else he is planning upon taking so much of their property (rights) as is necessary to fill the holes in his pocket.
![]() Odd that Vermont had no papers to publish this notice in and that it had to be sent to Providence, R.I. for publication. |
![]() |
![]() |
#15 |
|
The last notice had me curious so I looked up Lyndon township, Vermont. Seems the original grant was to Rhode Island peoples.
http://www.rootsweb.ancestry.com/~ve...niaLyndon.html The grant of the township being to citizens of Rhode Island, most of the early settlers came from that state and vicinity, Seekonk and Rehoboth, Mass. Others came from the interior of Massachusetts, and the valley of the Connecticut river, in Massachusetts, Vermont, and New Hampshire; and some from the interior of New Hampshire, Sandwich and its vicinity. The first settlement was commenced by Daniel Cahoon, Jr., a native of Providence, R.I., then coming from Winchester, N.H. He, with a few chosen men, commenced a clearing on right No.3, allotted to his father as original proprietor, in April 1788. |
![]() |
![]() |
#16 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#17 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#18 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|