General Discussion Undecided where to post - do it here. |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
![]() |
#21 |
|
Hitler and his minions were ultimately responsible for the rape and destruction of Germany and untold millions of German lives. They took Germany and turned it into a police state. Some of their aspirations were indeed noble, such as fighting Communism, but the decisions made by Hitler ended up handing Germany over to rapine and servitude. He is no hero to be idolized bute singly the most responsible person for the destruction of Germany. The next most responsible were the elite Jews who decided that Germany should be ground into the dust. The German people said no to having Jewish masters and that did not sit well with the arrogant Jews. |
![]() |
![]() |
#22 |
|
He sure gave the Rothschilds exactly what they wanted They have used a crisis to their benefit to be sure, but to act like it is a fact that "Hitler was a rothschild agent" does not even stand up to logic. |
![]() |
![]() |
#23 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#24 |
|
While I do respect you guys and have heard of the Rothschilds connection to Hitler, I don't believe it. Research what Patton said about the jews and the communists and also the admiration he had for the Germans.
Hitler's biggest mistake was attacking Russia. So many European countries from the Ukraine to Greece fought with the Germans during WWII. So many white Christian lives lost, 5 times the amount of the Holohoax and look at where we are now. Fighting for the fucking scraps. Negros, muslims all of the third world is destroying our homelands and the jews pull the strings. Hitler had it right. And Alex Linder said it best, "The only way out is through the jew". It's time will come. |
![]() |
![]() |
#25 |
|
[QUOTE-"General of Darnkess"]Hitler's biggest mistake was attacking Russia.[/QUOTE]
From a purely strategy based viewpoint, I have got to agree with you there. Militarily, the smartest move would have consolidating western europe and re-establishing naval operations in the Mediterranean sea. Unless an invasion from Stalin was imminent, and I mean within the next 90 days - it would have been wiser to hem up Europe. He should have taken Britain like he planned to do all along. For much of WWII, Hitler had been bombing and destroying British air fields, until he basically downed most of the RAF. He then switched to bombing London, a huge mistake. He actually let the RAF build new bases and re-lauch. It is so strikingly clear that if he had captured Britain instead of invading Russia he would have won. What is the US going to do, set up a bunch of ships in Tunisia and invade? Remember how the Germans lost WWI - mostly due to the naval blockade of Jutland, where the British shut down Germany's access to the north sea and therefore any imported provisions. By the end of WWI German soldiers got what little food there was and many peasants were reduced to eating a government issued "Synthetic Foodstuffs" and some simply starved. This caused civil war at home in Germany. Meanwhile the Americans were dropping tins of butter and other supplies behind the French and British lines. And the Germans STILL almost won the war through raw military might. Most people don't know enough about WWI and don't know how close it was. German artillery was actively shelling Paris when the peace treaty was signed. So about Rothschild, I just automatically assume that they are in position to profit from wars when they occur, so I think it is safe to assume they benefited. I look at WWI/WWII like the Greek Peloponnesian war - one long war with a generational break in the fighting in the middle. So basically I am re-learning about Hitler with this new idea in mind (was he a R.childs' agent?) and seeing if I notice anything new. |
![]() |
![]() |
#26 |
|
As an example, when I was still doing broadcasting we did this interview. I was the co-host on this but this from almost 2 years ago and see where we are now.
http://reasonradionetwork.com/201003...ce-part-1-of-2 |
![]() |
![]() |
#27 |
|
Damn if I'd ever thought I'd see such a warm and fuzzy piece like that about Hitler. Our f**king savior! Hitler once said that 'History is written by the victors.' I bet he didn't expect the Jews to win.
I read a book by Archibald Maule Ramsay called The Unnamed War. It's about what European Jews did to get Hitler and the Germans so riled up. Very interesting perspective on it. You can download it here: http://iamthewitness.com/books/Archi...meless.War.pdf It broadened my view on history a little. I now see the world divided into power centers. States (Countries Governments) are a power center. Big Corporations are a power center. Banking (money) is a power center. Ideologies (Political Parties) are a power center. Media is a power center. If you got control of all of them, you could strangle everybody until they did what you wanted. You would rule the world. That's the Protocols of Zion and the NWO in a nutshell. If you control the money, you can control everything else. You can corrupt people with money. But you need to do it secretly--out of public view, so you buy the media with money to distract the public. And you need to make sure everyone knows who is paying them, and what would happen to them if they got out of line. So you need to hire some goons--but you get a lot of goons if you control the government--and the goons will follow all the laws without questioning them because they know who pays them. There is a Luciferian force that drives this octopus that is swallowing up the world. It forces people to make a choice whether to go along to get along, or to stand up to something they know is wrong. I think Hitler was a pawn of this Luciferian force and so too has every American President since Abraham Lincoln. It's the money power. Doing things for money is paying tribute to Lucifer. Humanity needs to rethink money. And I also think the zionists were using Hitler back then as the 'paragon' of anti-semitism to gain control over all the Jews. Today, they use anti-semitism to gain control over the non-jews. How many hate speech laws are there in the world? I'm not surprised to see the world warming up to Hitler. It's a sign of how free the internet is of Luciferian control. You can see this Luciferian force in action. Pick your favorite MSM Media Talking Head. They are chosen primarily for appearance. Then comes the ability to read a teleprompter convincingly. They get training in Neuro Linguistic Programming and meter and diction. What they read is the official story of this Luciferian force--and millions of people allow it to become their reality without having a second thought. Who writes the stuff you hear on the news? How much credibility do the experts and authorities you see in the news have? People assume only honorable and honest people get to become experts and authorities. Perhaps a mass awakening means that people will start to question what BS they are being fed. And who is feeding it to them. Hatha |
![]() |
![]() |
#28 |
|
You know, I am really not trying to minimize Jewish influence in Germany prior to WWII. I took a class once, called "History of Germany: From Bismark to Hitler" So basically from the founding of Germany in 1871 to 1945. (They were formerly the Prussian empire)
One of the main points in the class, emphasized over and over, was how disproportionately represented Jewish people were in German society. I don't remember a lot of the numbers because that was a long time ago, but the one I do remember is that among the German universities, 50% of the faculty was Jewish. .75% of the population overall. Germany complained quite publicly about this for decades. |
![]() |
![]() |
#29 |
|
Book, my whole point in linking to the Ramsay book was to provide some information about what the German beef was with the Jews. It's as TNE says--they made themselves the elites of Germany, and there was a popular resentment of that. It was the same in Poland. The Jews there controlled the economy, and the Poles resented that. Jews had advanced a step ahead of 'nationalism' at a time when Germany and Italy and other eastern European regions became 'countries' instead of a part of somebody's empire. Because they were in all countries, they were practicing 'internationalism' or, as we know it today--globalization. They were engaged in a struggle to own or control resources as an international organization, while Germany and the rest of the world saw themselves as 'Nations'. The Europeans still see themselves that way today and are having difficulties with muslims who do not assimilate as well as the jews did, and represent a new lower class in many european countries. Their presence in large numbers threatens the cultural identity of many european nations.
The agenda of the money power is globalization. Just as they stated in the Protocols of Zion. No more nations. Just one giant global empire with them at the top holding all the power. Hitler resisted that, and instead tried to put himself and Germany at the top of that global empire, and he lost. We haven't seen the end of this struggle. The United States has still to be destroyed as a nation, and made a part of a global empire. Hatha |
![]() |
![]() |
#30 |
|
You could just as well say that your immune system is responsible for making you sick. When a virus (Jewish bolshivism) invades your body, your immune system (the "police state") needs to fight it harshly or else you die. |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
|
here we go AGAIN.....Hitler s name was shikelgruber...there were MANY jews on his cabinet. He was financed by jewry, promoted as man of the year in the jewish press, and managed to consistently and "convieniently" make decisions that cost Germany the war. Stalin? well HE was fifnanced by jewry, WAS also jewish aka-djukashvilli..and
when will people STOP believing jewish propaganda and take the red pill....oh btw "hitlers" philosophy minister ![]() ahh it was alfred rosenberg! oh and the rest of you bowing at the feet of jewish propaganda, tell me what are the names of the rich jew bankers that hitler had killed?? how many rothschilds, warburgs etc?? NONE. the protocols states "it will be neccessary to sacrifice some of our own"... |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
|
bullshit. we believe what benjamin freedman told us, we believe ezra pound....the list goes on. If I were to ever consider a jews opinion on something the last thing it would be is Hitler. I find it quite humorous though that you and some others are like "oh Hitler had jews all in his cabinet and was financed by jews, as you can see from these various jewish authors I am citing" And then get mad at me when I saw fuck the kikes, all of them. |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
|
but you believe them hook line and sinker that shikelgruber (hitler ) you opinion of him mirrors the official story as promoted by international jewry to the letter. im not trying to flame you bro its just theres a glaring disparity here. |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
|
|
![]() |
Reply to Thread New Thread |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|